Preview

Advantages and Disadvantages: Federal, Confederate and Unitary Systems of Government!

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
646 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantages and Disadvantages: Federal, Confederate and Unitary Systems of Government!
Advantages and disadvantages: Federal, Confederate and Unitary Systems of Government!

The unitary government is often described as a centralized government. It is a government in which all powers held by the government belong to a single, central agency. The majority of all worlds’ governments are Unitary. For example, Great Britain. Some advantages of a Unitary Government are; uniform policies, laws. Enforcement and administration throughout the country. This is a huge beyond huge positive trait of a Unitary Government. Also, there are fewer issues between national and local governments. A unitary Government depicts greater unity and stability too. As far as advantages go, there are disadvantages as well. This government seems to be out of touch with the local concerns, and is quite slow in meeting those problems. This means that the government only serves the minor inconveniences. In all, a Unitary government has its ups and downs, although is a widely used system throughout the entire world. A Confederate Government is an alliance of independent states. A central organ – the confederate government – has the power to handle only those matters that the member states have assigned to it. This type of government system is not used very much today- in fact it is very rare in today’s modern world. The closest government system we have today in the European Union, it is the closest to a confederation presently. The advantages of this system are: Confederate Governments keeps the power at local levels. This prevents the growth of a large central government. It also makes it possible for the several states to cooperate in matters of common concerns and to also retain their separate identities. A confederate government is the type of government where the national government derives its powers from the states. It has the power to handle matters that the member states have assigned to it, and only that. That’s a type of disadvantage as well- a limited power to fix

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalism is basically a system adopted by a nation that allows two or more levels of government to have power over the same people and area. This, however, can lead to conflicts since the two governments might try to assert power over the same issue. This can be clearly seen in the Gibbons v. Ogden case. In this case, Chief Marshall was able to use the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to make clear that Congress, and not the states, has the power to regulate commerce between the states. Therefore, this conflict between the two levels of government was resolved by this court decision. If the United States had a unitary government, where all power resided the central government, this issue would not have…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism has been renovated to meet modern stability and progress. An advantage for the establishment of federalism include the closer ties between people and government…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Confederate System is considered the opposite of the Unitary System. A Confederate System is “A league of sovereign states in which a limited central government exercises free Independent powers.” This system provides a Central Government to deal with areas of mutual concerns, such as, common currency; when it comes to other areas for Confederate Systems to take charge, the member states ban these actions to be taken care of by the Confederate System. “The United States is a confederacy, it was established in 1861.” The Confederation is “A union that consists of parties, united groups, and leagues.” There are also advantages and disadvantages of the confederate system. The advantages of a Confederate System are 1. Keeps power at local levels, preventing the growth of large Central Government. 2. They make it possible for the several states to cooperate in matters of common concerns. The disadvantages are 1. Having a weak…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Women have always had a dominant role in the prosperity and growth of any community. These roles have changed depending on the time period, geography and race of the people. America had three most important groups of women: the Native Indian, the African, and the European. These three groups came from exceptionally different backgrounds, and played dissimilar roles in their family and community.…

    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assignment 5: U.S. History to ReconstructionIn 1861 most Southerners thought that the Confederacy was favorite to win the war. The Confederacy’s sheer size – 750,000 square miles – was a major asset, making if difficult to blockade, occupy and conquer. Confederate forces did not have to invade the North: they simply needed to defend. The fire-power of the rifle-musket meant that battlefield tactics now favored the defender. The Union, having no option but to attack, was bound to suffer heavy casualties. Southerners hoped that Northern opinion might come to question high losses. If Northern will collapsed, the Confederacy would win by default. Geography gave the Confederacy an important strategic advantage. In the crucial theatre of the war – North Virginia – a series of rivers provided a barrier to Union armies intent on capturing Richmond, the Confederate capital. Slavery, which might seem to be a Confederate weakness, enabled the South to enlist more of its white manpower than the North.…

    • 2576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the Constitution was received by the greater part of the States in 1789, uniting the States into one country, contrasts between the States had been worked out through compromises. By 1861 these contrasts between the Northern States (which incorporated the Mid-Western and Western States) and the Southern States had turned out to be great to the point that compromise would no more work. Along these lines, a contention began inside of our country that was known as the Civil War. This Civil War was absolutely encouraged by the vigorous requests of numerous Northerners for the prompt abrogation of subjugation. Yet, an examination of the occasions driving specifically to war will demonstrate that Southern politicians likewise must share a great…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Civil War ended in April of 1865, and it left many things behind to be dealt with. There were many issues, and in a lot of them the North and South had different point of views. Although the North was very rich, the South was tremendously poor. Despite the result of the Civil War, the Union acted like they were in control, and the South couldn’t do anything about it. One controversy that the North had was if they should allow the Southern states govern themselves. The North should not let the states in the South lead their own government. It would be too dangerous and would be a major setback toward the North.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The confederate states wanted to break away from the united states but failed. However, now they had to rejoin the union. The war had left the souths economy and society in destruction. It would take a lot of effort to reestablish states. The remaking of the states was called reconstruction.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a unitary state system, it is a singular power. The unitary system has over half of the world, so that would definetly be a advantage. Another advantage is that the nation is uniformed, meaning all laws and patriotism are the same. This way, there is no hoping states with different policies. Taxes going to better use, is an advantage that this applies to.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, the ability to win a war relied on nationalism. The Confederate States of America was shaped on paper, although this may be true, it did not fully sink into the hearts and minds of the CSA’s potential citizens (Beringer). The documents that were formed to establish a separate country from the U.S. demanded more from the would-be citizens than it had to offer. With this being said, Nationalism played a key role in the American Civil War because many soldiers harbored conflicting notions of…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Union and Confederacy both had advantages and disadvantages. The North had better advantages because they had a higher populace, more industry, and better assets than the South. It had a better banking system that they could rely upon to help them raise money for the fight. Furthermore, the North had more ships and a had a proficient and larger railroad framework. On the other hand, the South had the benefit of fighting in a familiar region protecting their property, homes, and families. Another favorable position that the South had was having that military training background on the battle field. The disadvantage that happened in the North were attempting to take the Southerners back to the Union, and by doing that they would need to attack and hold the South in their intimidating populace. The South faced material disadvantages. They had a smaller population of free man to manufacture an armed force. It had a couple of facilities to help distribute weapons, food, and other supplies. The South experienced issues conveying food, weapons, and supplies to…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays