In South Africa it applies to both employers and employees and it protects workers and job seekers from unfair discrimination. it has been argued that it helped the poor people, women and disabled people to get access to jobs, education and health facilities. During apartheid black people had no access to universities like (UCT) university of Cape Town. But now black people, Asians, and coloured people are being enrolled though there are still differences but to a greater extend its defensible. Moreover affirmative action is defensible in a sense that women during apartheid were not allowed to take positions in companies besides working as tea ladies but in present life most women are working in companies and occupying higher positions in companies and political parties. Angelina Motshega minister of education is one of the example that indicates that the policy had succeeded in some areas thereby led it being defensible.
Furthermore companies in South Africa and mines were being owned by white people most during the time of apartheid. But since affirmative action was implemented black people now own companies and mines, Patrick Motsepe is of of the black people in south Africa who is owning some mines, therefore the policy comes as a benefit to people which makes it defensible. In as far as health is concerned the policy played a major role by improving the health opportunities and accessibility to disadvantaged people. During apartheid there was limited accessibility to health facility within black people because they couldn't afford to pay for medication, thereafter the government introduced free medication to the majority and a lot of free clinics and hospital were established.
Accommodation was a big problem before the implementation of affirmative action. Black people most of them couldn't afford to stay in suburbs as well as nice houses, but the government of Nelson Mandela prioritized social spending in health, welfare, education and housing in its first term. It introduced Reconstruction and development programme on housing (RDP), the project which were building houses for the disadvantaged population. The policy gives access to piped water, electricity and good roads within black African and coloured populations.
Legal aid was also lacking within the black community, prior to 1994, black South African were unprotected by the law. And the source states that "legal codes of the country categorized human beings as African, coloured, endian or white. Racism under apartheid was both informal (everyday practice) and formal (laws designated areas where blacks could and could not live. There was no interracial sex, it was banned. White people were not permitted to get married to black people. Moreover black men and women were subjected to the humiliation of carrying passes during apartheid while most white people were not subjected to. Therefore the legislation of the new south Africa scrapped most of the old laws and rewritten in line with the South African constitution and international human rights agreements, thereby granted equal freedom to all South African nationals.
In South Africa affirmative action led to the emerge of Black Economic Empowerment (BEE). The BEE was implemented to promote the equality of black people in jobs and companies. It was established to promote growth and to develop the South Africa economy. The BEE focused more on employment equality not the destruction in white people's wealth away from their skilled labourers. The broadening of the economic base and therefore stimulating economic growth was the main goal of affirmative action for a country to reach its full potential.
In conclusion many people embraced the policy; however some concluded that the policy contradicted itself. The policy eliminates unfair discrimination in certain sectors of the national labour market by imposing similar constraints on another (Employment Equality Act, 55 in 1998, 4 years after the end of apartheid). In addition there are many people who don’t see affirmative action as a positive policy and would like to see it eliminated. In my own opinion these people need to realize that the period of affirmative action which we experience is not long enough time to solve major society problems.
Finally the affirmative action policy is defensible in a sense that it played a major role by solving the problem of racial inequality in United States and South Africa. Affirmative action is a policy we should all support until better and more effective plans are proposed.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines Affirmative Action as “positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically excluded. When those steps involve preferential selection—selection on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity—affirmative action generates intense controversy.” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2001)…
- 943 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Affirmative action is a policy with a set of criteria’s designed to ensure equality for all groups within a society to provide everyone with an equal opportunity to obtain success. Affirmative action in American society is renowned for allowing minorities and women a chance for equal access to education and a chance to access equal employment. Affirmative action can lead to the adoption of quotas for jobs and colleges in which a certain amount of potential employees or appointments must come from formerly underrepresented groups of people.…
- 1495 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Affirmative action is the broad spectrum of policies designed to redress inequalities in employment and education through a system of preferences to minorities according to Ellen Bailey of Yale University. It was originally designed to help improve opportunities for African Americans during the civil rights movement; however it soon grew to include other minorities groups and women too. In the United States where individuals in certain social, racial, gender and economic groups have distinct advantages to education and jobs, affirmative action provides important opportunities that would otherwise be closed to many people who do not belong to these groups. Until each person is allowed to pursue his or her goals unfettered by institutional and personal discrimination, affirmative action is absolutely necessary.…
- 801 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Yes I would say it is morally defensible. Although affirmative action programs can be attacked on strictly legal grounds, they are far more defensible on moral and practical grounds, and if they are carefully designed, even their legality can be defended. The fact that current defenders of legal color-blindness so often have a history of condoning preference as long as it benefited white men shows that they argue in bad faith. The presence of such a powerful and wide-ranging impulse to guard white privilege against inroads by minority "interlopers" strongly suggests that a good-faith effort to end discrimination against minorities and to remedy the pernicious effects of historical discrimination would require a fairly muscular approach. On purely practical grounds, the state has a significant interest in promoting equality of opportunity for all. As long as members of certain minorities are effectively prevented from escaping the narrow range of opportunities which historical discrimination has relegated them to, a significant portion of those minorities will continue to be trapped in poverty.…
- 901 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Affirmative Action is any active efforts that take in account race, sex, and national origin for the purpose of remedying and preventing discrimination. In 1961, President Kennedy made Affirmative Action to show equality. He also did this to increase the minorities in College. Later on, people such as white males didn’t like it because they weren’t getting into college. Most people believe that Affirmative Action should be taken away. People say that, 20% of the minorities that got to the top college drops out. They also say that, minorities that get in is only from Affirmative Action.…
- 474 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Affirmative action was first referenced to in 1961 with the signing of Executive order 10925 (Brunner). With this the Committee on Equal Opportunity was created, and was mandated that "projects financed with federal funds take affirmative action ' to ensure that hiring and employment practices are free of racial bias" (Brunner). Three years later, in 1964 President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights act that prohibits any form of discrimination (Brunner). On June 4, 1965, President Johnson defined the concept of affirmative action saying, "that civil rights laws alone are not enough to remedy discrimination" (Brunner). Supporters of affirmative action say that the government must make up for the past by aiding groups that have been discriminated against. They argue that goals for hiring are necessary to integrate fields traditionally closed and minorities because of discrimination. Does achieving these goals help the American population?…
- 726 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Opposing views on affirmative action (1996) (miscellaneous) Since the beginning of time there has been prejudice and hate. Adam and Eve hated snakes. Jews hated Jesus. Sugar Ray Leonard hated Tommy Hearns. Prejudice is caused by two things: ignorance and hate. Prejudice and mistreatment has existed in this country, first with American-Indians and then later with African-Americans and other minorities. The selling and trading of slaves is a shadow that has been hanging over the heads of white Americans for two centuries. Some people feel that it is the white-American's duty to pay the black population back. According to Spencer Perkins, co-author of More than Equals: Racial Healing for the Sake of Gospel, in reference to the long-standing racial divisions in America, "It took us 300 years to separate ourselves like this, it's going to take a while to undo that." (Zipperer 44) Affirmative action is designed to give minorities, such as blacks, the opportunity to maintain jobs in our prejudicial society. For those who support Affirmative Action they define it as a way to give the disadvantaged a chance at the "American dream." Those who do not support Affirmative Action define it as giving minorities positions that they are not qualified to have. As Mr. Khalenberg, head editor of The New Republic says, "we will still reward those who play the victim" (Khalenberg 27). Just imagine that you have gone through six years of college and have gotten your degree. You go looking for a job and even though they are tough to come by you manage to get an interview with a well-known company. The interviewer tells you that you and one other person are equally qualified and in the running for the job. You get a call later telling you that you didn't get the job because the company had to hire a minority. You would most likely be angry, right? The purpose of this paper is to show the differences in how people feel about the issues involved with affirmative action. This paper was…
- 3156 Words
- 13 Pages
Better Essays -
In 1972 The Equal Opportunities Act of 1972 set up a commission to enforce the…
- 925 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the most significant current discussions in legal and moral philosophy concerns affirmative action. Affirmative action is an action or policy intended to eliminate discrimination against ethnic minorities, women, and the disabled in workplaces and educational institutions. In employment and educational institutions, affirmative action does the followings: names and demolishes discriminatory barriers for instance biased testing or recruitment; performs outreach to the inadequately represented women and minorities by administering colleges, women and minority organizations. Also by allowing race or ethnicity to be one of the considered factors during evaluation of qualified candidates, affirmative action provides diversity to both workplaces…
- 1457 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The distribution of pollution and lack of water access throughout the San Joaquin Valley is an issue of environmental justice because it disproportionately affects poor people and people of color. The term “environmental justice” represents both a movement and an idea. The idea of environmental justice is multifaceted. David Schlosberg, a political theorist and environmental justice scholar believes it contains three main aspects: distribution, recognition, and participation. Distribution refers to the fact that low-income communities and communities of color disproportionately face environmental burdens.…
- 1653 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Affirmative Action is an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, especially in relation to employment or education; positive discrimination. Affirmative Action was first referenced by John F. Kennedy in Executive Order 10925 which was put in to create equal employment rights for all qualified persons. The whole point of the executive order was to make hiring a person be on their skills and not their skin color, nationality, gender, or religion.…
- 276 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Affirmative action is the policy in which schools give priority to students who tend to suffer from discrimination. The policy was intended to give minorities equal rights in the admission process, however nowadays, it gives an unfair preference to one group of students, as opposed to being equal. This leads into the discussion of racial discrimination. Opponents of the law say that affirmative action gives minorities an unfair advantage over non-minorities. On the other side, proponents of the law say affirmative action is the way to reverse the negative effects caused by years of racism and discrimination before 1961. I believe that affirmative action is a good sentiment to the minority community, however, I think it’s the incorrect approach to fix the problem. You can’t solve the problem of discrimination by creating more discrimination.…
- 644 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The affirmative action has served its purpose, and therefore is no longer needed. A lot of people also say that because of the implementation of this law many people who are qualified for a specific position has lost that spot to someone who is…
- 513 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Affirmative action is the practice of improving educational and job opportunities of groups of people who have been treated unfairly in the past due to their race, sex, etc. In the US the effort was to improve the educational and employment opportunities of women and men of minority. Following the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, affirmative action was designed to counteract the lingering effects of generations of past discrimination.…
- 633 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Affirmative action is a controversial topic topic, especially in American society. Affirmative action is an active effort to improve the employment or education opportunities of members of minority groups and women. It also means a similar effort to promote the rights of other disadvantaged persons. In America, affirmative action is for a disadvantaged group to have equal opportunities, regardless of: race, religion/creed, sex, national origin, and disability (OFCCP). Many surround the words affirmative action around race, but socioeconomic status, gender, and various other background characteristics play a role. These factors and more especially in the realm of education. Affirmative action is beneficial due to its history and who it affects.…
- 1385 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays