This case involves the arrest of the suspect for drinking an alcoholic beverage in public (beer) in violation of PMC 9.24.010- Drinking in public. The suspect was cited out.…
I tend to agree on the view of Seaman. I know during my first year of college, many people as well as I went to parties. At these parties drinking was definitely a stable, everyone was concerned how and if there would be alcohol at the party. That was pretty much the deciding factor on which party to attend. Party goers often binged and many were injured due to the over indulgence. If the drinking age was placed back at 18 instead of 21, then I feel people would not feel it is a “forbidden fruit” and in return decrease the curiosity of…
As long as college students, legal and underage, drink with responsibility on or off campus without any means of causing disturbance, destruction, or injury to themselves or others, then the schools should not be held responsible nor care, for that matter, of what students can do when it comes to any type of alcohol consumption. Even if to say a college student was to die from alcohol abuse, no matter the age, on campus, the university should still not be liable for the poor choices that student made for it wasn’t the school that made that student drink themselves to death. Each student has a conscious mind and knows how to utilize it, and if a university were to control it just because one immature student chose not to is inadmissible. However, some students may seem irresponsible with drinking habits due to the fact that they are new to…
The University of South Alabama is a Division One school and sooner than later we will be getting a stadium for our football team on campus. That in tells tailgating and that will mean consumption of alcohol on campus. Now the university could go through people getting permits for their tailgating tents but that is a lot of work. People are generally lazy and that will cause less revenue for football games and less participation from our Alumni. I know Sororities and Fraternities have a permit that allows them to have alcoholic beverages in their houses for their parties, which are on campus. At these parties you have to have your driver’s license and you receive marking on your hands if you are allowed to drink…
Drinking in the dorms is regulated ineffectively, the issue is rooted from RA training and then manifests to communication between RAs and students. Although OU is a dry campus freshman students still drink in the dorms without fear of being caught. The alcohol strike policy is intended to deter students from drinking on campus but the policy is hardly ever strictly enforced unless a complaint of alcohol is made by another student. Saying OU is a dry campus is a joke in itself made to sound nice.…
Task 2.2 Explanation of how others in social networks may provide support to Richard and Sophie.…
Since July 17, 1984, when the United States Congress enacted the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, people only above the age of 21 could have the opportunity to legally purchase and publically possess an alcoholic beverage. The Congress’s purpose for establishing the law was primarily to combat motorist under the influence of alcohol, as the death rate of traffic accidents were significantly high before 1984 in the US where the typical minimum age to drink was 18. Which is the average age for a first year student in college, and apparently the age where minors become involved around alcohol. Meanwhile, it has been nearly unavoidable to prevent underage students in college the consumption of alcohol. As according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, about four out five college students drink…
The pros of lowering the drinking age are just as many as there are bad. Lowering the drinking age to 18 is only fair since you already have the right to vote, smoke cigarettes, serve on juries, get married, sign contracts, be prosecuted as adults, and join the military. Permitting 18- should 20-year-olds to drink liquor over controlled situations for supervision might diminish perilous drinking movement. Bringing down the drinking age from 21 to 18 would decrease the thrill of breaking the law to get a drink. The drinking age now is ineffective since the majority of teens still consume alcohol. Many law enforcement agencies ignore most underage drinking. And lastly if the drinking age was lowered it would be good for the economy.…
According to a 2009 study (Hingson et al., 2009) 1,825 college students between the ages of 18 and 24 die from alcohol related unintentional injuries. Even more shocking, 599,000 students between the ages of 18 and 24 are unintentionally injured under the influence of alcohol. So, is the solution then, to completely can alcohol from college campuses, and institute a dry campus policy? Does the ‘just say no to drugs’ campaign keep people from doing drugs? The real solution is to educate students about the dangers and consequences of excessive drinking. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and alcoholism reports, “ that 44.1 percent-nearly half-of students in the 116 colleges surveyed were binge drinkers.” (2006) “Research has shown that what’s successful in cutting down college drinking is a slow but…comprehensive attack on alcohol use on campus that targets not just the drinkers, but aspects of college life that might encourage them to take the bottle-nearby bars, liquor stores and liquor advertisors.” (Park, 2006) Schools using education programs instead of extreme measures provide alcohol-free dormitories, alcohol-free activities and provide training to restaurant and bar staff about serving…
Allowing 18- to 20-year-olds to drink alcohol in environments with supervision, could help decrease unsafe drinking activity. They would not feel like they have to hide and drink that, therefore it could decrease unsafe drinking activity. Less people will end up in jail cause they won't feel like they need to break the law because it is or won't be long until they can legally drink. It would be more safe to drink when citizens are in public places where there are other people if someone needed…
Binge drinking on college campuses affects more than just those that are doing it-teachers, parents and the quality of campus life all suffer when the problem gets out of hand. Putting an end to binge drinking is not easy but it is possible with the right initiatives.…
This way, children (young adults) can be taught how to drink socially and responsibly from a young age, so alcohol isn't such a mystery and there would be less attraction or desire to being able to drink when they turn 21 with there friends. Children need to be taught how to drink responsibly by there parents, and not by some irresponsible friends. And most parents wouldn’t have to worry about criminal charges or D.U.I.’s because they chose to teach there children about drinking responsibly when they where…
I do not think that the mind of a teenager could handle alcohol, especially if not taught how to drink responsibly. Teens, in my opinion, are not mature enough to be given that open opportunity. I think that it would cause more harm than good. It would be my assumption that if we lowered the drinking age, there would be a higher change of alcoholism and alcohol related deaths among teenagers. That may not be true but it seems as though it would be reasonable to assume so. According to SADD (Students Against Destructive Decisions) statistics, “during the past month (30 days), 26.4% of underage persons (ages 12-20) used alcohol, and binge drinking among the same age group was 17.4%” and “alcohol use remains extremely widespread among today’s teenagers. Nearly three quarters of students (72%) have consumed alcohol (more than just a few sips) by the end of high school, and more than a third (37%) have done so by eighth grade.” So given these statistics, I believe it is time we step up, as adults and teach our youth the effects of alcohol, good and bad, and to teach them how to consume responsibly. If we do not do this, I believe the underage binge drinking statistics will continue to…
Most of the reported behaviors showed little to no change until after the legal drinking age was raised in 1987. To prove this, 45% of students reported vomiting after drinking from 1982 to 1987. After the 1987 law change, over 50% of adults reported throwing up. A substantial increase other college related variables increased. Leaving class early after a night of drinking jumped from 10% to almost 15%. Missing class due to being hung-over went from 25% to 30%. Students receiving lower grades because of drinking rose from 5% to 10%. These increases in abusive and irresponsible drinking are due to privately drinking in student dorms and apartments where individuals would gather and play drinking games and proceed to get drunk while outside of adult…
"A comparison of college students attending schools in states that had maintained, for a period of at least ten years, a minimum drinking age of 21 with those in states that had similarly maintained minimum drinking ages below 21 revealed few differences in drinking problems" (Hanson, "The Legal Drinking Age: Science vs. Ideology"). For example, a large study of young people between ages of 16 and 19 in Massachusetts and New York after Massachusetts raised its drinking age revealed that "the average, self-reported daily alcohol consumption in Massachusetts did not decline in comparison with New York" (Hanson, "The Legal Drinking Age: Science vs. Ideology"). College students, young teens and drinking will always be inevitably associated with each other regardless of the circumstances or rules. So what is the point of conceiving and enforcing a policy that is already failed and is doomed to fail? Cocco 3 Administrations cannot stop alcohol abuse, but they cannot ignore it either. With the college administrations ignoring it with the hopes that it will go away is simply unaccepted and should not even be an…