Preview

American Gun Rights

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
American Gun Rights
Under Fire: The Rights of American Gun Owners In the world that humanity has constructed it has left itself vulnerable to threats that nobody could comprehend: terror, mass murderers, chemical warfare, and numerous others. These fears have caused a vast rift in the population of the United States. People just do not feel safe anymore and how the population is dealing with their fear is coming across numerous fields; the biggest area under siege is the Second Amendment. In this debate on United States citizens gun rights, there are two main groups, the gun rights supporters and the ones who argue for gun control/ban measures. What gun control advocates fail to understand is that crime is decreasing as gun density is increasing, the amount …show more content…
It does not matter what type of deterrents or laws that you put in place. It will not affect these shooters. People often talk about the criminals and what they would do with firearms, but what about all of the responsible gun owners in the United States. There are two main factors that drive the sale of guns and they are the need for self-defense and fear of tougher gun legislation (Koenig 2). It does not matter what state one looks at it seems to be the same across the board (Koenig 3). Numerous people everyday carry firearms for self-defense, some of them not even being police officers. The community who advocate really harsh gun legislation cannot get it past one of two places. These people struggle in the Senate were multiple proposed assault weapons bans have been shot down (Koenig 10). If gun control even struggles in the Supreme Court. In 2008 the Court choose to uphold the constitution and fight a District of Columbia gun ban (Spitzer 149). Not only do some of the gun control advocates want a total ban but the want the laws we already have to be harsher. Right now we have laws that work and make sense for law abiding citizens. The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibits the interstate transfer of firearms which does limit criminals access (Spitzer 99). Then on top of that, there is the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act which mandates background checks (Koenig 8). The background checks that are used are run through the NICS system, a system run by the FBI to make sure there are no criminal charges against your name (Koenig 8). These are just the federal restriction let alone all of the state responsibilities imposed on gun owners (Koenig

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Having stricter gun laws isn't going to make these people suddenly change their tune. If someone had the intent of killing someone, why would they be afraid of something that could be trivial in comparison, such as illegally purchasing a gun? If more people had the means to combat these criminals, this problem would be almost non-existent. Often, when murdering someone, a criminal would most likely want to live afterwards. The mere thought of having everyone shoot you once your gun has been sighted is a better deterrent than another law to be…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firearm injuries are one of the top ten causes of death in the United States (“Statistics”). Firearms are the second leading cause of traumatic death related to consumer product in the U.S. and are the second most frequent cause of death overall for Americans ages 15 to 25 (Violence Policy Center para.4). Every two years more Americans die from firearm injuries than the total number of American soldiers killed during the eight year Vietnam War (Violence Prevention Institute). In 2005, 11,346 people were killed by firearm violence and 477,040 were victims of a crime involving a firearm. In 2006, firearms were used in 68 percent of murders, 42 percent of robbery offenses and 22 percent of aggravated assaults nationwide (National Institute of Justice). “Homicides committed with firearms peaked in 1993 at 17,075, after which the figure steadily fell, leveling off in 1999 at 10, 11. Gun-related homicides have increased each year since 2002”(National Institute of Justice). The federal government needs to take action to prevent similar tragedies from happening in the future. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Debacles

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page

    The purpose of this paper will give a historical background of the gun control debacles in the United States, and will focus on gun control and the Second Amendment, the historical context of the Second Amendment and the legitimacy of gun the control legislation, America’s most dominant gun control movements since 1980, as well as presenting the effects they have had on the American public by analyzing different approaches state-by-state across the U.S., to understand if there is a correlation between the number of firearms, and killings committed by guns.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control laws will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns or breaking laws. John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, gun rights activist, stated, "The problem with such [gun control] laws is that they take away guns from law-abiding citizens, while would-be criminals ignore them."…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, gun control doesn’t deter crime. A November 26, 2013 study found that between 1980 and 2009 “assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level” and “states with restriction on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murders”(www.gun-control.procon.org). Weapons didn’t stop crimes or murders, and that states with restrictions on concealed carry weapons had even more crime than…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On any given year, roughly 12,000 Americans are killed in gun-related homicides. That means, on average, 33 U.S. men, women and children die at the hands of others using firearms each day. Stopping this violence entirely is an impossible task. As a people, all that Americans can do is try to mitigate this violence using policy, and recently attempts have been made at doing so by limiting the people’s right to bear arms. On paper, this approach makes sense: to lessen gun violence, fewer guns should be legally allowed in society and more regulations should be imposed on those weapons that can be carried. However, gun control is admittedly not that simple: some cities and states with more stringent policies have lower violent crime and firearm…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Further evidence from Gun Violence and Gun Control states “On an annual basis, about 30,000 Americans are killed with guns each year, about 80,000 seriously injured…and an estimate in 2000 concluded that gun violence costs the nation a total of $100 billion annually in direct and indirect costs, including medical costs and lost productivity (805-806). The need for Americans to be able to protect themselves appears to be well documented. According LaPierre, Vice President of the NRA “Some 2.5 million times a year, according to well founded research, Americans defend themselves with firearms” (LaPierre 153). In contrast, Gun Violence and Gun Control states that “most analysts believe guns are used in legitimate self defense situations approximately 100,000 times per year” (806). The difference in figures and opinions reflects the vastness in the differing opinions as well as how high their emotions run. Nonetheless, there does appear to be a need for Americans to defend themselves and a need for regulation. The preceding statistics, along with examples of the obvious failure of banning firearms, and the number of firearms kept out of criminals hands due to the Brady Bill offers evidence for a need for a balance in…

    • 2849 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    If gun control is enforced, there will be less times when guns are used in the wrong way. It’s easy to think that a criminal background check is all that is needed when selling guns, but some shooters legally bought the guns and their criminal history starts after their purchase. For example, James Holmes was what the NRA would consider as a responsible gun owner. He had no bad history with guns, that is, until July 20, 2012. That’s when Holmes walked into a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado and killed 12 innocent people, and injured 70 more.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The gun control laws do not solve the real problem which is the gun owner. Even if we have strict gun control laws that doesn’t mean the crime rates will go down or the school shooting will stop. If a criminal wants to kill someone they don’t have to have a gun to go through with it. It is just as easy to grab a knife or make a small bomb. Most criminals that want to shoot and murder people already have lengthy records and wouldn’t be able to pass a background check if they tried to purchase a gun legally. And even if the criminal does have a clean enough back ground to purchase a gun, one study reveals that most of them fear purchasing a gun legally because they know that it could be easily traced back to them. Instead the people we should be trying to stop are buying their guns on the black market. Most of the criminals that were interviewed during the study even distrusted so called internet sales on guns because they feared they were sting operations and they’d wind up trying to buy one from and ATF…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the school shooting in Connecticut, the debate about gun control has been the topic for discussion. The reaction all over the country is "change or repeal the Second Amendment." The Second Amendment is one of the reasons we have more guns than any country on the planet. Some people believe that banning guns will decrease the number of crimes committed in the United States because they believe guns are the roots of all crime, and banning guns will decrease the murder rates and give everyone a peace of mind. While others believe that abolishing guns would not change anything. People would still get murdered, robbers would still rob, and it would not make people feel safer, it could in fact do the opposite. Appealing the second Amendment will not sufficiently work unless the government was to go through every home and building- through peoples personal belongings- and take every gun they see. Guns are not the problem, people are. What we need is reliability from the government, stricter regulations on gun control, and better examples set.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Laws

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun control laws have currently become a major debate in society. Increasing gun control laws may do the opposite of protecting citizens. Although if people think guns contribute to crime studies have shown otherwise. Crime rates may increase if the gun control laws become stricter than they already are now. The government is on a quest to control society’s recourses to guns and ammo because of the past terrorist and hate crime problems. The people trying to increase gun control laws do not take into consideration that the second amendment has already stated that the people have the right to bear arms. Yet, people don’t obey it even though it is a constitutional amendment. So what makes them think that wasting their time on creating another law is going to actually stop people from doing what they truly want to do? Creating more gun control laws has not stopped citizens from obtaining guns and ammo yet. Spending more money and time is not going to change their mind nor stop criminals from somehow getting what they want. Gun control law makers should focus on the benefits of guns.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the biggest controversial topics in America today is Gun Control, whether we should or should not have gun control. The Government claims that if they take the guns away, that there will be a drop in deaths and crimes. The Second Amendment state that every citizen of the United States of America has a right to bare arms(ProCon#1). The Gun Control Law will take away that right completely, along with some of our freedom. If the Gun Control Law is enforced in the United States, our hunting right will be removed, our self-defense right will be taken away, and it will amplify the problem.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays