Preview

An Argument In Favor Of Gun Control

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Argument In Favor Of Gun Control
If you asked someone, “What is the first thing that comes to mind when you hear the word ‘gun’,” I bet you the average person would say something along the lines of violence, death, or war. This doesn’t have to be the case. Guns can mean protection, safety, and survival.
Gun control is a very controversial topic that has been discussed for years. Proponents of more gun control often want more laws to try to prevent mass shootings, and call for smart gun laws, background checks, and more protections against the mentally ill buying guns. On the other hand, opponents of more gun laws accuse proponents of using a tragedy to further a lost cause, stating that more laws would not have prevented the shootings. Gun control, or the regulation
…show more content…
Gun controls laws infringe upon the right to self-defense, and deny people a sense of safety. According to the National Rifle Association, also known as NRA, guns are used for self-defense 2.5 million times per year. 61% of men and 56% of women surveyed by Pew Research said that stricter gun laws would "make it more difficult for people to protect their homes and …show more content…
John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, gun rights activist, stated, "The problem with such [gun control] laws is that they take away guns from law-abiding citizens, while would-be criminals ignore them." Basically Lott is saying is that if a criminal wants a gun then he/she will find a way to obtain a gun whether it is legal or illegal.
Gun control laws give too much power to the government, and may result in government tyranny and the government taking away all guns from citizens. The Executive Vice President of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre stated, "If you look at why our Founding Fathers put it [the Second Amendment] there, they had lived under the tyranny of King George and they wanted to make sure that these free people in this new country would never be subjugated again and have to live under

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Similar to that of the Second Amendment, argument is between those who are pro-guns versus anti-gun. Pro-gunners are advocating for, not more lenient laws but simply, that the government attempts to better enforce the laws that are already in existence. Comparatively those who are questioning the validity of the Second Amendment are appealing to the government to place stricter restrictions on the ownership and distribution of guns. Those who are pro-gun are supported by the National Rifle Association (NRA) in the United States, whose arguments, based in the right to “freedom” as according to the Second Amendment, are directly hindering the progress of gun control. The NRA claims that “there are currently more than 20,000 firearms laws in the U.S., clearly more than enough to punish criminals who misuse firearms, but the laws have to be enforced” (Braga 2001, 545). However many of these 20000 laws are restricted by others, thus making them unenforceable and furthermore, many of these laws were created with the intention to be difficult to enforce (Braga 2001, 546). The NRA has undermined many of the laws in place by the “sponsoring of legislation that undermines the ability of the ATF agents to build cases against unregulated private sellers involved in firearms trafficking” (Braga, 2001, 546). Those involved in the making of laws towards…

    • 2491 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control advocates focus on the serious negative effects on gun availability on safety, while gun ownership advocates emphasize the lawful use of guns and their place in our history and culture. While our history and culture is important we need to address the current national problem in order to live in a safe enough society. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is needed. In the bigger picture, we people will see the United States, as a Nation, as a better safer place to live in and not to die…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control is one of the most debatable topics in present day. Gun control refers to laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms. These firearms include handguns, machine guns, rifles etc. People use these weapons for multiple reasons. Some use it for sport, for example: hunting or practicing at the gun range. Others buy it for protection while others use it for violence. Having a firearm requires responsibility. The person that wields a gun is responsible for his safety or others. They are also responsible for using a weapon against someone. According to procon.org, ''The United States has 88.8 guns per 100 people, or about 270,000,000 guns, which is the highest total and…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the last couple of years, gun control has continued to be a huge controversial debate in Congress. This argument over whether gun control laws should be strict is nothing new to the world of politics. The ideas of gun control consist of laws that either keep away firearms from people, or allow one to keep guns for personal protection. They also control who the guns are being sold to and who can own them. In America, each state government has passed many gun control laws. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Whenever people hear the word gun, the thoughts…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem that splits gun control proponents from their opposition is the language of the second amendment of the constitution. The founding fathers of this nation believed that, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). This multifaceted sentence from the Bill of Rights brings many quarrels to life with its simple diction. It is very open to interpretation, which is what causes both sides of the debate to have “legal stances” on the matter. The National Rifle Association (NRA), which is the nation’s largest gun advocacy organization, is led by the philosophy that it, “[hosts] a wide range of firearms-related public interest activities of the National Rifle Association of America and other organizations that defend and foster the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans.” What gun advocates in the NRA often fail to understand, however, is the conscionable limits to the Second Amendment. As 27-year serving Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia stated in the majority opinion of the District of Columbia V. Heller decision, “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited” (Scalia). This lead Scalia to also state that, “it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” These sanctions are legal proof that the second amendment allows for the government to regulate the distribution, ownership, and use of weapons. On top of that, Scalia, regarded as the most conservative justice, clearly highlights that gun control is useful and at times…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Gun Control Arguments

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since 1982, there have been at least 85 public mass shootings across the country, with the killings unfolding in 34 states from Massachusetts to Hawaii. Due to these mass shootings, the left side/liberals believe that the United States’ government needs to act and create and enforce gun control laws. Some people view all guns, no matter the purpose, as malicious and there is too easy of access to own a gun. The second amendment is in existence because our Founding Father’s saw how important it is for a free country to be able to stand up for themselves against tyranny. Those who are pro-gun control do not understand the valuable means behind the foundation of the United States of America. For 200 years, the second amendment has helped…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control laws will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns or breaking laws. John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, gun rights activist, stated, "The problem with such [gun control] laws is that they take away guns from law-abiding citizens, while would-be criminals ignore them."…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This statement would be invalid because, “(96.1%) of those inmates who were already prohibited from possessing a gun at the time of the crime obtained the firearm through an unlicensed private seller” (Universal Background Checks). Despite most guns being obtained illegally, it does not mean we need to enact more laws on gun restriction, but to make sure that all private sales of firearms have background checks. Another loophole that is frequently used, would be at gun shows. During gun shows there are no background checks; therefore, allowing people prohibited to own guns an easy way to obtain them without having to worry about a transaction record. Even if America did increase gun laws, it would be restricting the people’s ability to protect themselves from harm. “As many as 200,000 women use a gun every year to defend themselves against sexual abuse” (GOA 1); and “Every two minutes someone is sexually assaulted in America” (Victims of Sexual Violence: Statistics). The removal of guns will not fix all of America's violent issues because there are many weapons that we can not take away such as sexual assault. In fact, abolishing guns would do more harm than good to this country, this being a prime example. Even if we were able to take guns away from these violent people, it would not stop them from committing a violent…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Approximately 30,000 people die a year because of guns when they are used in both self defense and murder. Many people argue whether restrictions on guns should be enacted or repealed. Tensions have grown high on both sides of the issue making it a hot topic in our country today. Many people cast their votes in the last election based on their feelings about this very issue. The divide among Americans when it comes to gun control is large, spanning from those who want strict regulation, including an outright ban on all firearms, to those who want complete legalization of individual gun ownership. Guns can be used for killing or protection, so it is important to examine all…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Gun Control Essay

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Most people who own guns, are the legal owners of that weapon (“Kates”1). Other countries and some states in the United States that restrict gun laws have more murders than places that do not have gun laws (“Guns in”3). In the United Kingdom they banned handguns in 1997. Since then, the attack and crime rate went up 77%. This is equivalent to two attacks every two minutes. (“Guns in”3). This is further evidence that guns are not just for killing, guns are for…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Gun Control

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the United States, 88.8 out of 100 people own at least one firearm (Morris). A common misconception in today’s society is that these firearms are the root of all crime. Gun control is unconstitutional, illogical, and Nazi esque. In fact, more guns would be an improvement to our nation. Guns are a right given to us by the second amendment, and can be used for recreational purposes, self-defense, and are a means of keeping the government in check. The right to bear arms is a crucial part of this nation’s foundation, put in place to regulate the power of the very people trying to take our guns away from us.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Issues

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun control is any law, policy, practice, or proposal designed to restrict or limit the possession, production importation, shipment, sale, and/or use of guns or other firearms by private citizens. There should be stricter gun control laws in the United States. A CBS poll, conducted on Dec. 14, 2012, found that 51% of adults nationwide were in favor to make gun laws stricter. Currently we have a divided government with the majority of the House of Representatives going to Republicans, the majority of the Senate going to the Democrats, and adding to that a Democratic President. Democrats favor strict gun control laws e.g. oppose the right to carry concealed weapons in public places. Republicans oppose strict gun control laws and are strong supporters of the Second Amendment as well as the right to carry concealed weapons.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem being crimes committed using fire arms. What the Government fails to recognize is that criminals do not abide by the laws, taking weapons away from law abiding citizen will only give the criminals more means to do harm. There is a law against braking and entering but criminals still do it. There is a Law against stealing, yet criminals still continue to steal. So what will taking guns away from Law abiding citizens do? Absolutely nothing other than make citizens more vulnerable to the criminals. While a study was found between 1980 and 2009, shows the States with restrictions on carrying concealed fire arms had higher gun-related murders(ProCon #2). This will also be the first and only Law that amplifies the problem rather than helping. If criminals want to have guns they will find a way to get them. Taking away legally owned guns does not get rid of the illegally owned guns. The Gun Control Law will give criminals the upper hand, they will be more likely to shoot innocent people to get why they want, expectably know there will not be bullet fired back at them. The reason Gun control has not affect on murders is because the killing is not being done people with legally owned…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control, as defined in the Merriam-Webster, is “laws that control how guns are sold and used and who can use them” (Webster). This means that this regulation on guns limits who can own a firearm and it tries to rule over throw a gun is used. Gun control wants to influence crime and reduce the harmful effects of violence. “Proponents of gun control generally argue wide spread gun ownership increases the danger of gun-related crime, suicide, and accidental injuries. Opponents argue that gun control does not reduce such injuries and violence individual liberties”.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays