The feed constantly advertises products, and can do most task the user requires. The feed helps use the least amount of thinking as possible, and solves problems instantly. The message in this book, is to let technology take away our intellect and control us. In their society, most songs, books, and anything with words become very basic and easy to look at so people don't have to think hard, and will spend money. The feed can be related to our smartphones, our generation uses smartphones for almost everything. It is slowly causing us to talk with more slang and dull down our brains, but it would take a very long time for anything like the feed to…
But he also refutes these views to make his point and help his readers to understand how he became to agree with the use of spyware by parents. A good instance of this is when Coben talks about parents abusing the programs to overprotect their children he uses it as a way to show that parents will “fight their kids’ battles,” but when it comes to their privacy they don’t want to intrude even if the child could be getting themselves into a difficult situation. This is a good rebuttal because it’s showing that these parents are being two-sided by wanting to protect their child when in public from such thing as playground bullying or tough coaches, but these parents also wanting to give their child privacy when they could really be getting themselves into trouble on the computer and internet where they could be talking to a sexual predator and not even know…
When asked asked what the benefits and drawbacks of new technologies were Gardner responded, “...the Internet has certainly contributed to the broadening of acceptable identities in today’s young people,” Gardner continues stating examples, such as being a geek or openly gay, that are now considered to be socially acceptable. Gardner explains that with the use of new technologies teens are encountering more diversity; cultural, religious, and general diversity “reinforce the acceptance of difference.” What Gardner did not include was that while it opened up acceptance horizons, it also opened shunning horizons, more so bullying horizons, because with the acceptance individuals became more open about themselves, and so did the people who did not agree with them. Everyday someone is shunned for being who they are, with advancements in social networking somebody in the United Kingdom could tell another in the United States that they are an abomination, what they’re doing or how they’re living their life is wrong, being themself is wrong. So, has technology really opened acceptance, or has it given a false hope, a facade, of acceptance to cover up the new form of intolerance; the only difference now is you’re being judged by somebody who doesn’t know you, a face you’ll never see, a voice you’ll never hear, a text box you’ll never forget.…
In Feed, M.T. anderson uses diction to show how the future might turn out be one day. In this book, the author shows little futuristic analysis. This book was written in the year 2002, and it is actually coming to real life little by little as the generation changes. With more technology there is on the world, the more the government is inside our personal space so in fact, we do not have personal space at all because they are everywhere. The future might actually turn out to be just as the author revealed in this book, Feed.…
For the past twenty or so years information has largely been stored in digital form, providing the current generation of digital natives with access to more and more information in recent years. With this new flow of information available to the public has come increased censoring by the government. However, this is not a new issue as some might believe. Since the first primitive government was established information has been shielded and manipulated from the every day citizens of the world by those in power. The cause fought against information censorship enjoys the same past. For as long as information has been censored there have been those who have fought against it (Newth, 2010). This issue has arisen particularly in the United States, as some believe access to any information that exists is a right protected by the Constitution.…
Censorship means many different things to many different people. To some it may mean the ratings on a movie or video game, or the banning of books. There are many reasons for censorship also, Judy Blume believes that “censorship grows out of fear, and because fear is contagious, some parents are easily swayed” (Judy Blume on the Web). Although censorship may have thought to be and out dated practice and to have no place in our modern society, it is alive and exists in many forms; one of which is book banning. The First Amendment grants authors the freedom to write what they want but it also gives the public the voice to protest against these authors objectionable material. When books like Forever by Judy Blume are removed from public views, it may be under the premise of protecting today’s youth from harsh material; however, it may also result in young readers being deprived of entertaining stories and the chance to learn life lessons.…
After having read the filter bubble, I strongly feel enlightened in a way I never thought possible earlier. We are surrounded by media not only on just a day and night basis, but on a minute to minute or literally second to second basis. In today’s world of a constant need for information in the fastest and the most convenient ways possible, one unknowingly becomes accustomed to living in a bubble of information, ideas, knowledge, concepts, facts, news, current political affairs, entertainment etc. catered to one’s individual needs and not a holistic picture of the world that one lives in. I strongly feel that the filter bubble or in other words, the miniature world that is literally separated from the rest of the world, that unwillingly gets created for us while we perform searches about any which topic, location we mostly log on to our computers/laptops/cell phones/tablets etc from, our gender, our race, occupation, economic status, education, our political preference, our travel destinations, our social media such as Facebook/Twitter/Tumblr/Instagram/Pinterest/Soundcloud etc is greatly limiting us from accessing everything outside of our comfort zone and is preventing us from learning the whole, unbiased truth behind various topics we search for.…
A helpful resource for understanding filters, their impact, and how to challenge them is: Young, J.E. & Kolsco, J.S. (1993). Reinventing Your Life. Penguin Books.…
“In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…
Parker, Clifton B. "Greater Regulation Not Necessary for Internet, Stanford Scholar Says." Stanford News. N.p., 08 Apr. 2016. Web. 13 Feb. 2017.…
The author’s main goal is not to create hate nor to create fear against the use of the Internet in our society. I believe the objective of the author is to simply inform the audience about the disadvantages of frequently using the Web. Just like any other things in this world, no matter how great they are, they will all have some sort of a…
Many reasons exist for people to favor censorship, both by the government and in schools. These people may feel that internet filters and rating systems insufficiently block obscene material. Some people believe that children exposed to inappropriate material will become promiscuous or will become desensitized by violence on television. Although censorship may be necessary in protecting national security, there is no evidence to support that it protects children, and therefor...…
Upon reading the chapter, the filter bubble fundamentally alters the way we encounter ideas and information. According to the book, the filter bubble introduces three dynamics we’ve never dealt with before which is one, you are alone in it, second, the filter bubble is invincible, and third, you don’t choose to enter the filter bubble (Pariser, 2012). In terms of privacy and internet experience, the filter bubble is a centrifugal force that pulls us all apart (Pariser, 2012). Google is known for not telling you who it thinks you are or why its showing you the results you’re seeing (Pariser, 2012).…
Some people think the government needs to stay out of everyone's personal business; installing filter software is not a solution to all things and it cannot take the place of…
The title of this article is Does the Internet Make You Smarter? It is written by Clay Shirky. The article is written in the Wall Street Journal. This journal entry is written to people who are used to the old routines of past and think that the internet is going to make the new generation stupid. This is also written to the new generation that is supposedly going to be so stupid, as a challenge to doing something great with the opportunity we have been given with this newfound technology. This journal points to the fact that history repeats itself with every new technology and every new invention. People think that it is going to corrupt our society. Then it ends up being something great, something that we really needed and something that helped us become more intellectual. Why is this the case? Why does it take our society so long to accept new ways of doing thing? Why do we have to jump to the conclusion that we are going to misuse it and nothing good will come from it?…