Preview

And No Matter Where You Run Into It, Prejudice Obscures the Truth

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
518 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
And No Matter Where You Run Into It, Prejudice Obscures the Truth
Twelve Angry Men Reginald Rose

Pg 53 when juror 8 says “And no matter where you run into it, prejudice obscures the truth” he means when ever and where ever you are narrow-mindedness and racism can cloud your judgment towards people of all races and cultures, this can be proved by the stubbornness of juror 10 to change his mind about the boys case, and juror 3’s absolute unwillingness to change is mind even when all the other jurors starting with juror 8 note innocent.

Juror 10 is one of the most racist and prejudice of the all the jurors a quote to show this is “Now you’re not going to tell us that we’re supposed to believe that kid, knowing what he is. Listen, I’ve lived among ‘em all my life. You can’t believe a word they say. I mean, they’re born liars.” When he says this he means/believes that people are born in slums are born to live lives of crime and disseat, even thou juror 5 was born and lived in a slum all his life he is a perfectly respectably man. This proves that juror 10 was wrong and people born in slums aren’t born to lie and commit crime. There for prejudice did obscure the truth for juror 10.

Juror 3 is the last to change his note because of his grudge against kids this grudge started him and his son had a fight and his son left home ever since juror 3 has had prejudice against kids, when juror 3 says “That goddamn rotten kid. I know him. What they’re like. What they do to you. How they kill you everyday. My God, don’t you see? How come I’m the only one who sees? Jeez, I can feel that knife going in.” this proves that juror 3 thinks he knows every kid in the whole world and knows that they are disrespectful and unthankful. In other words prejudice. When he says “Jeez, I can feel that knife going in” this shows that he is so shore of the boy committing the crime even thou the boy was found innocent in the end, showing that prejudice did lead juror 3 away from the truth there for proving the point that prejudice does obscure the truth.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first Juror to votes not guilty in the initial vote is the old white man who works as an architect. As when sitting on his office and drawing blueprints for constructing a building, He was very quiet and respectful in the room. He wasn’t convinced that the boy is innocent, but he wants to compare what’s really happened with the testimony’s evidence. At the end of the film he introduces himself to one of the jurors as Davis. He is free of prejudice, and he believes in justice for all. Although in his job he can be sure about the construction material and similar things,…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the number of people who think the defendant is guilty starts to dwindle, he chooses to use derogatory phrases such as “bleedin’ hearts” to try and persuade people to change their votes. He prefers to use brute force and voiced anger instead of logos to influence people. Although juror #3 frequently contradicts his argument, he dismisses it refuses to admit his…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also accustomed to forcing his wishes and views upon others (1). Therefore, during the developing of the voting, Juror Three try to force people to admit his prejudice continuously. If people do not agree his view and vote for not guilty, he is angry and interrupt other Jurors’ discussion. Even though other jurors support appropriate assumption and evidence to prove the murder is not guilty, Juror Three do not believe and keep his prejudice which has logical fallacies. For example, when Juror Nine change his vote in the second voting for not guilty, and want to explain the reason why he change his mind, Juror Three answers, “No, we wouldn’t like to know why”(12). When Juror Eight try to measure how long the old man can walk in 15 minutes, and walk as slowly as the old man who uses canes. However, Juror Three says, “You made it sound like a long walk. It’s not,” (19) and when Juror Eleven thinks Juror Eight’s behavior can be an important point. Juror Three declares, “It’s a ridiculous waste of time”…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Flaws

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Also juror number 1 had some character flaws too. Juror number 1 was the foreman and he was very relaxed and lacks intelligences, but most importantly he is very obedient. In the description of jurors for one says “Not overly bright”(The script) When the jurors go to the jury room and after everyone's gets settled in and down, he says “I’m not going to make any rules,” which sounds like he does not really care and relaxed (The script). Juror 1 gets talked over a lot and not taken serious by the others jurors, which makes him obedient to majority of the group. Well as juror number 3 is way different than juror number 1, he lacks moral courage, sadists and very opinionated. In his description it says that he is “extremely opinionated and detected a streak of sadism”(The script). Some things he say such as: “ We don’t need sermon” to juor 9, way he talks about his own kid “Rotten kid,” after juor 9 explains about the old man eyewitness and “Well, that’s the most fantastic story I’ve ever heard” (The script). Juror 3 is really rude and making his own feelings on what happen to his own son's relationship get away from the real…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The extract from the novel “To kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee is a dramatic account of a trial of a Negro, Tom Robinson, wrongly accused of a capital crime of raping a white girl. His defending counsel, Atticus Finch, a smart lawyer and a man of high principles, does his best to prove to the jury Tom Robinson’s innocence. Atticus exposes the false testimony of the chief witness for the state who turns to be the guilty party and condemns the Negro’s accusers for their prejudiced attitude and groundless resentment against the black people. Atticus reminds the jury of the high mission of a law-court to be a great leveler and appeals to them to do impartial justice. But for all Atticus’s convincing arguments and his…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scottsboro Trial Report

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    I was a juror at a Scottsboro trial today. As I sat down I had noticed that the jurors around me were almost all white which seemed almost peculiar. Once the court case began, I had heard the side of the lovely Victoria Price and Ruby Bates. Everything that they claimed seemed possible and is most likely what happened to those two poor ladies. Looking at those African-Americans defending themselves filled me with even more anger and hate towards their kind. Why would they do such a thing towards innocent white women and then continue to spit out lies? The boys seemed to have no valid defense and factual evidence to support their case and should be ashamed of themselves for trying to spread lies to the people watching. Victoria, however, had…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the novel, To kill a Mockingbird, we see a young naive girl who follows society’s beliefs. She see’s the evil in the world through racial issues. There is also a fictional trial for Tom Robinson. Prejudice takes part in this trial in the novel. She want’s to fall into society's beliefs and fault Tom for the crime. (To…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prejudice is a negative aspect of society that has unfavorably affected many different people. In the novel, racial prejudice is evident but there are more types of prejudice on the novel. We said that racial prejudice is evident because in the novel a black man (Tom Robinson) was caused from raping a woman named Mayella Ewell and therefore had to go to trial. There were many points of view with regard to the case of Tom Robinson, but of course all influenced by prejudice because the color of Tom. The people of Maycomb town thought that Tom was guilty. Atticus and children (Scout, Jem, and Dill) thought that he was innocent. When we read this we can see that the prejudice is an important theme in the novel. For this reason it is necessary to make an analysis of this topic.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was other concrete evidence in which the decision should be based; the Architect believes that his age makes him less likely to commit the crime. Following this statement, the jurors may have began to think of the suspect as a young innocent boy and not have him in such a negative light, although the Architect was not successful in persuading members of the jury. This fallacy could have been avoided if he only called out the fallacy the Father committed in the previous statement (“The man’s a dangerous killer. You could see it.”). He could have said he is not a dangerous killer until they find the evidence to prove so; rather than countering a fallacy with another…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Conformity

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is obvious that the second juror to vote a not-guilty vote is not motivated either by the possibility of a reward or a punishment, nor does he appear to be conscious of being justice and rightful. He even claims that at that point he still believes in the probable guilt of the accused. He goes on explaining that the sudden change of his vote is merely based on his admiration for the lone dissenter, whom he begins to consider as a role-model, and his courage and strength to stand against conformity even in the face of ridicule. At this point of the film, it is noticeable that the second juror begins to identify with the lone dissenter. The mechanism of the identification process is at work and the charisma of the dissenter is further intensified by the rude and dismissive way in which another juror leaves the bathroom while the dissenter is speaking. Indeed, the second juror¡¦s desire to identify with the dissenting voice has been foreshadowed by several exchanges that have already set against the voice of the majority of the jurors which have been cast as either explicitly prejudiced, personally influenced, or exhibiting a near-total disinterest in the question of the accused¡¦s actual guilt or…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To Kill a Mockingbird

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prejudice is a foggy window which we all look out of. It impairs not only sight, but our thoughts and actions. When looking through the window, not everyone can see past the fog. Sometimes, we see people with differences; they are what we may not want them to be; whether it be because of color or sex, race or religion. Tom Robinson, a black man, is accused of raping a white woman, Mayella Ewell, and is brought to trial. The townspeople of Maycomb believe in Tom’s guilt whereas Atticus and his children believe likewise. There are distinct views concerning Robinson’s innocence- views influenced by prejudice in Harper Lee’s novel To Kill a Mockingbird. When people rely on prejudice to create authority, they are blinded by ignorance.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Essay

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Set in 1950’s America, Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men, revolves around twelve men summoned to decide the fate of a young man’s life. Taking place in a New York courtroom, it follows the deliberations of the jurors as they attempt to make a unanimous verdict as to whether or not a sixteen year old is in fact guilty of murdering his father. Throughout the play, rose demonstrates the prejudice that obstructs the course of justice, and the diversity in beliefs and principals that separate jurors from each other. Together the jurors represent the microcosm that is American Society.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, prejudice causes bias. This was displayed when only one jury member had realized the unreliability of the Ewells’ testimonies. Atticus had pointed out “that there was one fellow who took…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, harshly depicts the sad reality of this prejudice. “In our courts, when it’s a white man’s word against a black man’s word, the white always wins” (295). Juries tend to stereotype African-Americans, and will consider them as less trustworthy and more violent than white people. These biases can influence the jury’s decision and increase the likelihood that they will find an African-American defendant guilty. The sixth amendment of the Constitution gives the right to a fair trial with an impartial jury, but in some cases, this is not always possible. As the character Atticus Finch says, “people have a way of carrying their resentments right into a jury box” (259). Preconceived notions and prejudices of the jury can impact the verdict of a case, making the trial unfairly biased against an African-American defendant. Some people may argue that the court systems are “colorblind” and that everyone receives a fair trial, no matter their race. However, African Americans are incarcerated at almost 6 times the rate of white people, due to inherent biases and racism of the…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays