Preview

Animal Testing Shouldn’t Be Banned

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
608 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Testing Shouldn’t Be Banned
Ayoub Laissouf

Animal Testing Shouldn’t Be Banned The exploitation of animals in experimentation isn’t a new issue because it could be traced back to the fourth century BC when Aristotle and his contemporaries used to perform experiments on animals. Besides, in the twelfth century, the Arab physician Avanzoar used animals to test his new surgery techniques before performing them on humans. Today, due to the advancement of the medical field, physicians rely excessively on animal testing. However, some organizations such as “PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals)” stand out against animal testing alleging that it harms animals and calling for it to be outlawed. I believe that animal testing shouldn’t be banned for several reasons (“Animal Experimentation”)1 The opponents claim that animals are susceptible to pain, and during the tests, animals are inflicted with severe injuries, and most of them die. However, that isn’t true because before physicians test drugs on animals, they test them on cells first, and they only use them on animals if they pass the cell test. Moreover, they inject the animals with adequate anesthesia to mitigate their pains during the test. In addition, the test is performed by experts who make sure to minimize the suffering of the animals by great extent. (“Animal Research Pros and Cons”)2 Animal testing plays a pivotal role in medical research and without it, combating critical diseases is futile. Thanks to animal testing, vaccines have been developed for deadly disease such as Hepatitis B, Herpes Simplex, rabies, Polio, mumps, malaria, and rejection of organ transplantation. Furthermore, if the experimentation on animals were banned, techniques like bypass surgeries, organ transplants, and heart surgeries wouldn’t be achieved, and many humans would perish. The reason behind its importance is because some animals’ body system resembles humans’ to certain extent. For



Cited: Naik, Abhijit. “Using Animals for Research” March 24, 2011. . 10/12/2013. Nair, Tulika. “Animal Experimentation” September 27, 2010 . . 10/12/2013. Shandilya, Ranjan. “Animal Testing Pros” December 16, 2011. . 10/12/2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Leonard Thompson Biography

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Scientists are constantly looking for new medical advances that they hope will save people’s lives and often turn to animals as the optimal resource for testing new ideas and products. These animals range from rats and mice to dogs and monkeys. On top of varying animals, the tests they run fluctuate from simply checking the effectiveness of a medicine already in use to testing an entirely new form of treatment. However, there have beens years of controversy over the morality of using animals as the test subjects.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you want to see animals abused and killed sometimes for nothing? Animal testing is flawed and can produce very unreliable results. Around 26 million animals are used every year for scientific and commercial testing. These animals are used to determine the toxicity and effectiveness of medications before they test it on humans. Therefore animal testing should be banned.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animals can be ferocious and wild, but they can also be gentle and tame. Some are our pets, and some are powerful forces that are to be respected and admired. It is as easy to appreciate a loyal dog as it is to be in awe of a lion in its' natural habitat. But the truth that many people either don’t know or don’t appreciate is that animals are essential to human existence and have played a vital role in improving the quality of our lives. They have been providing us with answers to our most complex medical questions for decades. Their role in finding cures for diseases, treatments for illness, and product safety is immense. First, we will examine how animal testing has benefited both man and beast. Second, I will dispel the belief that animals used in research are mistreated. Last, we will learn how the process of drug development is carried out.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay About Animal Testing

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The experimentation on animals may be an iniquitous act to some people; conversely, some people might see it as a tool used to save many lives. Animal experimentation in the medical field has been useful in many ways. Scientists are able to take information learned from animals and make educated guesses about the human body’s functions and determine a person’s reaction to a drug.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sally Porter

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States fir various types of testing. These animals are used for scientific and commercial testing to develop medical treatments, determine toxicity of medications and chemicals, check the safety of products destined for human use and other biomedical or healthcare purposes. This testing on animals is cruel, inhumane and should be banned. It should be banned because the animals are held and live in inhumane conditions, it is harmful and at times lethal to the animals and there are other research method available that do not require animal testing.…

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong 1

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Millions of animals are used every year for a wide variety of scientific and medical purposes. Some of this scientific research is to learn about and improve the welfare of animals, but most of the animal experiments are unfortunately conducted for human benefits. An estimated eight million animals are used in painful experiments, which can range from getting pricked with a needle to more severe experiments, and ten percent of these animals do not receive painkillers. Then after all of the pain that they had been put through, some of them are euthanized when scientists are no longer in need of experimenting on them. Animal rights advocates want government agencies to impose heavy restrictions on animal research, but their opposition of painful animal experimentation is matched by the growing concern that these restrictions would pose a threat to scientific progress. Although there has been scientific progress from this, animal testing is still cruel, immoral, and unnecessary because all animals, like humans, have value and are worthy of being treated with respect.…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Flaws

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The UDSA reported that in 2010 that there was 97,123 animals that went through pain during experiments and weren’t given anaesthesia for pain relief (“Should animals”). A former Maryland secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene, Martin Wasserman has said “Animals used in chemical testing-always alive and fully concencious-are never given pain relief (“Is animal”). Though, it has been argued that animal testing is better than putting human lives in danger. However, even though products or drugs have been tested on animals it doesn’t work on people. Neurologist Aysha Akktar has said that would about more than 100 stroke drugs that passed animal trials have failed to work on humans (“Should animals”). Proceeding of the National Academy of sciences in the United States studied that around 150 human tests have failed even though it was tested on animals (“Should animals”). In addition to suffering and deaths animals go through the results of animal and human clinics can have different…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, many people debate whether or not using animals in research is humane. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. [2] Proponents of animal testing state that it has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, while opponents state that animal testing is cruel and often yields irrelevant results because animals are so different from human beings. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it provides opportunities to improve the lives of both humans and animals.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever wondered about the pain and suffering that animals go through for our selfish needs? The topic of animal testing has been debated (raged) since the seventeenth century (1600), but in the recent years this topic has been under severe criticism by animal protection and animal rights groups. Although animal testing has been beneficial, animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals are being treated terribly for experiments that may have no point in the end. Is that what you would want to hear know your life could still be in danger?…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world of animal cruelty, there are plenty of controversial issues surrounding this topic. Out of all of them, animal testing would be the most controversial topic in dealing with animal cruelty. Scientists have been doing animal testing for many years, using animals as their guinea pigs. There is a controversy on whether animal testing is right or wrong. On one side, the article “Animal Testing and Its Gift to Humans” by Frankie Trull talks about, as said in the title, how animal testing is helpful in finding cures for human diseases and that we should continue in doing so. The article states “This extraordinary development wouldn’t have been possible without animal research” (Trull 2). This shows how animal testing has helped out in finding cures for many illnesses in humans. Without the help of animals, we wouldn’t have the cures we have today. On the other hand, some people believe that animal testing is wrong and shouldn’t be done. According to the article “Killing Animals and Humans,” it states “...many differences – both obvious and very subtle – between humans and other species make animal experiments a waste of time, effort, money and lives – both human and animal.” (Animal Aid 6). Why test on animals…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is true that medical advancements are needed in today's society but there are other ways to test medication other than using animals to test them. With today's technology, there are numerous alternative ways to test like, computer models and simulations, stem cell and genetic testing methods, and in vitro test methods based on human cells and tissues. Since there are alternative ways, they should be strongly enforced in today’s labs. No animal should have to endure that form of torture. Animals are also not the same as humans and will react differently than a person would.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing can be dated back to the ancient times of the Greeks and Romans. Physicians would dissect animals with the pure interest to obtain knowledge. But even then, one such physician stated that he would rather use a pig as his subject because he wanted to, “ avoid seeing the unpleasant expression of an ape” (Monamy 9). The ethics of animal testing has always been questioned. Humans do not want to think of animals as on the same level of us. The similarity is terrifying and makes the cruelty obvious. When discussing the idea of Animal Testing, there are generally two trains of thought: one who is against it for the animals sake, and the other who argue it's for the name of science. Even though it may seem like we need animal testing…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Relevant thesis. Animal testing is a hot question of debate, because of the bioethics behind it. There are two main sides of the issue to this topic that many people fall into one of the camps of. The first is that of antivivisectionist who believe that any living animal should not be tested on for research purposes. Antivivisectionist would not only note that the pain inflicted upon animals is unneeded for current advances in medicine.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing has its pros and cons but ultimately is unnecessary now. It seems that the only reason it still exists in such popularity is the immoral influence of large corporations. Experiment methods such as selective formulation, human cultures, the physiological chip, cellular tests, and microdosing have made animal testing, a once necessary evil, obsolete. For this, it seems experimenting on animals should at least be limited. Maybe one day it will be completely…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of animal experimentation has increased tremendously over the globe. Animal research is immoral because animals are being subjected to not being properly advocated for, are experiencing detrimental testing and there are alternative methods other than crucial animal experiments. Animal testing is defined as a scientific experiment to where a live animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause them “fear, discomfort, pain or distress” (Fisher). Animal experiments include injecting them with harmful substances, exposing animals to radiation, removing organs, forcing them to inhale toxic gases, and other horrifying procedures. Although through animal testing some diseases have been cured, there…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays