Preview

Animals Have Feelings Too

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
769 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animals Have Feelings Too
How many animals are used each year for animal testing? The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection believes there to be about 10 to 11 million experimented on in the United Kingdom, and the United States Department of Agriculture has tested upon 1,137,718 animals, not including mice or rats, in 2002 (Bidnall n. pag.). These statistics are only from two countries throughout this entire planet, which entirely surpasses prudency. Animals are not lesser than humans because they do not have the same intelligence, or a higher pain tolerance. Animal experimentation is unethical and should be banned.
It is true, of course, that animals are similar to humans and it seems easier and more ethical to test upon them in our society; however, animals are physically and emotionally harmed during testing. Without a law against it, and no ability to deny the tests, animals are the easiest test subjects. It is believed that they cannot experience the same level of suffering that a human can. Each year in United States laboratories and others around the world, millions of animals are used for experiments to test everything from suspected carcinogens to the insignificant toxicity of anti-per spirants. Some animals endure physical or mental pain in the course of research, but these experiments are still in progress because people believe that they are essential for human health. Many of the medical breakthroughs in the past century have resulted solely on these animal experiments (Leepson n. pag.). What gives humans the right to manipulate animals? “‘To my mind, we shouldn't be thinking of monkeys as commodities, disposable resources that can be the object of distressing experimentation, for example,’ says Mark Bernstein, a professor of philosophy and ethics at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind. ‘Just by virtue of their sentience, their capacity to suffer, they should have the minimal right to not suffer,’ he says. ‘We don't treat compromised human beings’ —

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the article “Animal Testing Is Cruel and Immoral Regardless of the Benefits Associated With It,” by George Wright and Steve Hoagland, the authors, argue that the use of animals for medical experiments is an immoral practice. The authors describe why people do not ask if the human species is more deserving of under going medical experiments than the animals. Also, in the article by Peter Singer, he said that if we share with them a capacity to suffer, this means that animals like people have interests. Like racism or sexists who believe that those who belong to their race or sex are superior, we are doing the same to the animals. But, there is no difference because animals also can feel. Why can only animals suffer? Wright and Hoagland demonstrate, that the human take advantage to govern the animals like capturing them and holding them in tiny cages. The authors give examples, about the last incident in 1983 at the University of Pennsylvania in which 150 baboons suffered brain damage. No doubt, there are a lot of cruelty of animals, but not just for the the…

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal experimentation is a highly controversial subject throughout the world and in the 20th century the public has become increasingly aware of the two sides to animal testing. The earliest dated animal testing can be traced back to 384-322 BCE and it is still a common practice to this day. There are a few disagreements that are highly debated about animal experimentation such as the importance of the testing for scientific and medical goals, the suffering of the animals, and the ethical principles that apply to animals. Both sides of animal experimentation have their reasons and facts for why animal testing is ethical or unethical, but it comes down to the amount of pain the animals suffers and if it is morally correct.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sally Porter

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States fir various types of testing. These animals are used for scientific and commercial testing to develop medical treatments, determine toxicity of medications and chemicals, check the safety of products destined for human use and other biomedical or healthcare purposes. This testing on animals is cruel, inhumane and should be banned. It should be banned because the animals are held and live in inhumane conditions, it is harmful and at times lethal to the animals and there are other research method available that do not require animal testing.…

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Animal Testing

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use is up. Some are injured and will still live the remainder of their life in captivity. The doctors will not do anything to help the animals that are in pain that happen to be the reason because of them. It is the aspect of animals testing that many view as a major negative against the practice, as it seems that the animal died in vain because no direct benefit to humans occurred. Even though animals and humans have many things in common like how we both have the same organ system, there are also many things that are different between animals and humans. Many animals cannot handle or take the same medication as humans, most the surgeries that are operated on animals are just too strong for an animal to take so they end up dying or sick for the rest of their lives. (Animal Testing…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Animal Testing

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals do not have a say once they are taken away from their current living space, and then killed or have to suffer through what the researchers put them through. These innocents now are being punished, abused, and now have more risks and a shortened life span. Realistically, in my opinion, in order to experiment on animals you really don’t have a heart. People who love animals, could never and would never experiment on them because the things that people do to them we really don’t deserve the satisfaction of animals. “Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means." This piece of textual evidence is explaining how animals are not treated properly while being used in experimentation. Animals are forced to do things unwanted to, and also are deprived of certain things. Consider the people who have to do this for a living- they are finding cures for us humans, and also testing products such as cosmetics and shampoos and making sure that we can use them. You may think that animal testing is beneficial, but it's not, it's putting animals life in danger. Rabbits are used to test cosmetics and shampoos, during this process rabbits are powerless and have their eyelids opened by clips this can occur for days. Moving forward, as you can see many animals are harmed during the process and it is very heartbreaking to hear about the many animals that are hurt or killed to find cures for us. If you anyone who loves animals, if animal experimentation is okay, they would say it was abusive, because you taking the life of an innocent animal and putting it in…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many argue if the information that we are gaining from using animals in experiments is even worth risking the animal’s rights and wellbeing. Every year animals are cruelly subjected to brutally savage and painful scientific experiments. It is believed from animal activists that in these experiments, animals are given no drugs to ease their pain, and once they are no longer useful for these experiments, they are killed. This is why many people educated on the topic ask where the rights of the animals are? What gives humans the right to decide that these animals are to be tested on? And why not test on humans?…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong 1

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Millions of animals are used every year for a wide variety of scientific and medical purposes. Some of this scientific research is to learn about and improve the welfare of animals, but most of the animal experiments are unfortunately conducted for human benefits. An estimated eight million animals are used in painful experiments, which can range from getting pricked with a needle to more severe experiments, and ten percent of these animals do not receive painkillers. Then after all of the pain that they had been put through, some of them are euthanized when scientists are no longer in need of experimenting on them. Animal rights advocates want government agencies to impose heavy restrictions on animal research, but their opposition of painful animal experimentation is matched by the growing concern that these restrictions would pose a threat to scientific progress. Although there has been scientific progress from this, animal testing is still cruel, immoral, and unnecessary because all animals, like humans, have value and are worthy of being treated with respect.…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals testing is unethical because the pain and suffering that they are subjected to is not worth any possible benefits to humans. Scientists inject animals with irritating chemicals, genetically manipulate them to cause rare and painful genetic diseases, give them cancer and other diseases, and cause other injuries in the name of science. These animals are not given painkillers and are forced to endure prolonged agony before eventually dying…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An estimated 26 million animals are being used for scientific and commercial testing. Animal testing is painful and unnecessary. Testing is cruel, unreliable, and sometimes dangerous to not just animals, but humans too.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals suffer just as people do. In 2009 animal experimentation was the cause of over 1.13 million animals suffered in U.S. Laboratories. Animal experimentation is unnecessary and expensive. It is useless to use the cruel methods of animal experimentation for our own benefit alone. The animals used in research range from birds, dogs, cats, pigs, etc. So many innocent creatures put up with the immense pain so that science experiments can be made and new products can be put on the shelves. Many of the animals used in the testing and experiments are blind, severely burned or poisoned. Animals don’t need to suffer testing.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Jim Motavalli questions in the article “Rights from Wrongs”, “Does a pig packed in a tiny factory cage waiting to be killed have any rights in America? And what about the chimpanzee, which shares 99% of its active DNA with humans (Motavalli 26)?” Scientists are permanently harming these animals and don’t even mind. Scientists must realize that these chimpanzees and other primates may be close to us in DNA, however we should not be using them in this way that could permanently injure them. “In the U.S. more than 100 million animals are tortured due to animal experimentation practices- classified as any testing that is likely to induce pain or suffering among creatures (Yashiki n.p.).” This pain could not only hurt them physically but also emotionally, no animal is going to want to live after being abused like the way they are in labs. Jen Yashiki claims in her article “Animals Do Not Need to be Harmed for Better Products” that some scientists have been studying ways to use human tissues instead of closely related animals for more accurate tests (Yashiki n.p.). There are better things to solve the animal testing problem then hurting innocent creatures permanently.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals must have rights they are defenceless if an animal is being hurt, they cannot say stop or how they feel about it and that to me is very disappointing. I feel like animals are easy targets for laboratory experiments because they cannot stand up for themselves . These animals being tested on go through so much mentally and physically. They are locked in cages they don't even fit in ,they are treated as if they don't feel it or that they aren't even living creatures. These animals being experimented on go through the use of force like force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Animal Testing

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For example, Jeremy Bentham states, “In research and testing, animals are subjected to experiments that can include everything from testing new drugs to infecting with diseases, poisoning for toxicity testing, burning skin, causing brain damage, implanting electrodes into the brain, maiming, blinding and other painful and invasive procedures.” Most of the operations are disturbing and severe treatments that lead to many deaths. Although the Animal Welfare Act was mad, it still lets scientists do these procedures legally If scientist keep testing these animals it will lead to extinction and varied genes. Each year more than 100 million animals are killed in US laboratories for more biological reasons, curiosity, and cosmetics. This number is extremely alarming and this number is only in the U.S. It is most likely that the number of animals tested in the world is a very startling number. Animals deserve to be in their natural habitat and not enclosed in a metal cage. David Haugen once said, “Pain is pain, whatever the creature that experiences.” Animals are creatures just like human beings and people are destroying and killing their…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would like to counter this with the argument that we have a higher obligation to humans. It has been asserted that ‘speciesism’, or thinking of animals as our lessers is the equivalent to racism or sexism (Andre and Velasquez, 4). I will concede that unwarranted suffering of any form of life should be avoided. In this case, however, it is by no means unwarranted, and animals should not be our primary concern. Animals in anguish is a legitimate issue, but so is the suffering of human beings from diseases and disabilities that could be cured. The majority of our focus must be on the latter. 90 percent of these animals are receiving pain killers; scientists aren’t hardened, unjust, and cruel people as a group. Tales such as the drowning of polar bears used in research extraneous to palpable development are used by activists to support their claims. The majority of people would agree that is an issue that should be stopped, but placing heavy restrictions on animal testing as a whole is not the solution. This would put a gratuitous burden on the productive research reaping benefits previously stated. To put this into perspective, “If we had to choose between saving a drowning baby and saving a drowning rat, we would surely save the baby.” (Andre and Velasquez,…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays