Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

AP Gov. Federalism Assignment

Satisfactory Essays
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
AP Gov. Federalism Assignment
The article that I read was discussing how the Defense of Marriage act, or DOMA, was recently overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States. DOMA was opposed by same-sex couples who claimed that the act violated their Constitutional rights. The act, passed in 1996, stated that the Federal government did not have to recognize same-sex marriages, even though they were considered legal marriages in certain states, therefore not giving federal benefits to same-sex married couples. The benefits included Social Security and immigration rights. DOMA was deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, saying that its policies violated the Fifth Amendment’s protection of equal liberty. The case was decided in a 5-4 decision, and while many people were overjoyed by the outcome, many people were not pleased with it. I believe that this article is a good example of federalism and how it works because it illustrates state powers, while also discussing the powers of the national government. States have the reserved power of regulating marriage licenses, so some states will accept gay marriage, while other states will not. Opposers of DOMA claimed that their Constitutional rights were being infringed upon, so they took the case to court. Cases involving questions of Constitutional rights fall under the jurisdiction of the Federal Court System, thus giving a specific power to the national government. This court case involves an issue, marriage, which is left up to the states, and a law that people found unconstitutional regarding marriages, which was taken to the Federal Court System.The article illustrates how certain powers are left up to the states, while others lie with the national government, thus showing the principles of federalism. I believe that federalism worked out well in this case because even though the Supreme Court used their power of judicial review to overturn DOMA, the states were still left with their decisions on how to handle same-sex marriage. Federalism satisfied the requests of some, with the overturn of DOMA, and still satisfied others by leaving the power of issuing marriage licenses with the states.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Edith Windsor: Case Study

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    According to the 104th Congress US Government Printing Office Section 1 is the short title which states: “This Act may be cited as the "Defense of Marriage Act".” Section 2 is about the powers reserved to the states. To sum up this section it states that “No State ... shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State ... between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State ... or claim arising from such relationship.” In other words one State doesn’t have to recognize the other States marital laws when it comes to same-sex couples. Now Section 3 is what the Supreme Court struck…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Sprigg) The court found that it is up to each individual state to make their own policy on same – sex marriage which was not followed during the time of Windsor. In regards to due process and equal protection, the Supreme Court found DOMA violated laws that the federal government placed in order for all people to be treated equally. (Sprigg) The majority stated that the main purpose of DOMA was to make same – sex couples feel at loss, especially when they were in a marriage. The law wanted homosexuals to feel like they lost their respect for their spouse.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DOMA Ruling Case Study

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DOMA caused the federal government to not recognize gay marriages. This meant gay and lesbian partners of federal employees did not receive federal health insurance,…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison begins his paper stating that he believes that each branch of the government should be independent from one another. If possible the branches would have as little agency with one another as possible. He believed that members from the different branches of the government should not be able to appoint each other or decide on other salaries. If these rules were followed the people would be in more control of the government by picking the best representative in each branch of the government. Madison and the Framers realized that every position couldn’t be elective because of political pressures and certain needed qualifications, such as in the judicial…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    h. What are some of the historical events that shaped the formation of the U.S. federal government? Select one event you think had a major effect on the federal government. How does this event affect U.S. citizens today?…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3 constitutional powers allow the federal system 2 expand the gov’s power 2 meet the needs of a modern nation in a global economy.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter One: Introducing Government in America I. II. Politics and Government Matter A. Government impacts your everyday life 1. schools are prohibited against discrimination 2. driving, drinking, and voting ages 3.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Four Justices disagreed, creating four contradicting opinion. Many of the supreme court justices disagreed with the majority stated that same-sex couples had the right to wed. All justices concurred that the Constitution itself does not say anything in regards to marriage. This implies marriage is not a counted right. Indeed, Justice Alito particularly stated, "The Constitution says nothing in regards to same-sex marriage." Because the privilege for same-sex couples to wed is not an identified right, the only way for it to be protected in our constitution is for it to be inferred. The justices stated that…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prop 8

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The freedom to marry is a fundamental right, it's an expression of emotional support and public commitment. The plantiffs, the gay and lesbian communiuty, argue that they deserve the "fundamental" right to marry their partner. The state of California wants to keep sexual activity withing marriages and because of Prop 8, same sex couples are permitted to engage in any sexual activity. However, same sex couples are allowed to adopt children. Plantiffs want to have the state recognize their relationships. The Equal Protection Law of the fourtheenth ammendment states that "no state deny any person within its jurisdiction." Evidence at the trial shows that marriage in the US traditionally…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism Interview 2

    • 803 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. What were the Mayor's responsibilities prior to the hurricane? Stock the shelters with food and water, mobilize cities and school buses for evacuation.…

    • 803 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federal government of the U.S. is the national government of the constitutional republic of fifty states that is known as the United States of America. The federal government comprises of three branches of government: a legislative, an executive, and a judiciary. These branches and their various powers are explained in the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution grants numerous powers to Congress. These include the powers to levy and collect taxes, to coin money and regulate its value, provide for punishment for counterfeiting, establish post offices and roads, promote progress of science by issuing patents, create federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court combat piracies and felonies, declare…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    wrwer

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe the states should decide specific issues of same-sex marriage as for there is nothing stated in the Constitution about same-sex marriage specifically; therefore, according to the 10th amendment, the decision belongs to the states/people, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"(The 10th Amendment). The quote defines the 10th amendment for the purpose that anything not granted to the Federal Government via The Constitution, then the power belongs to the people. Some may argue and say that same-sex marriage has to do with religion because everyones idea behind the issue regardless of whether they are for or against it, is religious. It is expressed in the 1st amendment how congress can make no law establishing or respecting an establishment of religion allowing me to believe that is why the federal government should not 'decide on the specific issues of same-sex marriage.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays