Preview

Appeasement Policy- Failure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
362 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Appeasement Policy- Failure
Appeasement was the policy adopted by the British and French prime ministers in 1930s towards Germany. The aim of which was to settle international quarrels by satisfying Germany’s grievances, thereby avoid the resort to war which in other words, maintain peace. There are several reasons to why the appeasement policy was adopted. Such as, Britain and France were both suffering from economic depression and thus felt that they could not afford to spend a large expenditure on arms to combat Germany. Besides, there was a feeling that the treaty of Versailles was too harsh towards Germany and it was reasonable to reduce the policies.

The appeasement policy was based on the idea that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and when his reasonable demands had been satisfied, he would stop.
However it gave Hitler the confidence to demand more land, such as taking over Czechoslovakia, another step towards the Greater Germany. Later on Hitler demanded the Polish Corridor and Danzig in August 1939, which eventually resulted in war. The appeasement policy fueled Hitler's actions to further devalue the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler broke the treaty of Versailles by sending troops to Rhineland, in addition to that Germany united with Austria which was originally banned in the Treaty of Versailles. At the same time, Germany gained time to build up their armed force and gain more military power. The policy aggravated Hitler’s ambitions and aggressions; he decided that Britain and France were unlikely ever to oppose him by force. Germany attacked Poland which at last led to WWII.

If France and Britain had stood up to Germany then Hitler would not have been so bold in what he was doing. If they did not adopt the appeasement policy, they might be able to force him to back down without a fight or defeated Germany in a much shorter, less destructive war. Instead they kept giving Hitler what he wanted, hoping to appease him, which ended up Germany getting stronger and stronger until

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ world war 2

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Prime Minister Chamberlain suggested the best way to deal with Hitler was a policy of appeasement.…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the view that appeasement was the only realistic option for British policy towards Germany between 1936 and 1938…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always a consequence for not standing up to stop a situation at the first sign of trouble. Unfortunately, that consequence was one that the world had to pay because the world leaders did absolutely nothing to stop Hitler at the first sign of trouble. They just let Hitler continue with what he was doing in order to “keep the peace”. However, they didn’t realize that by letting Hitler do these things, they were opening a door to a world tragedy that would change history as we know it forever. Some of the factors that contributed to appeasement being incorrect was Sudetenland becoming German territory, Hitler gaining more support as time went on, and Germany taking control of Austria.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of them being that Germany was frustrated over the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was upset that they had to follow unfair demands, including paying for all of the damages of World War I, lessening their armies, and limiting their military. In time, an aggressive ruler in Germany came to power named Adolf Hitler. Hitler felt that the outcome of the Treaty of Versailles was unfair, so he did the opposite of what the treaty stated and put all the money into building a stronger military. As time went on, Germany wanted to reunite their brother land (doc 1). Since other powerful countries feared the power of Hitler and his army, they gave into him, following the policy of appeasement. They agreed to the terms in which the “Big Four” gave Czechoslovakia over to Germany in order to resist war (doc 4). Hitler believed it was their right to the land because Germany owned it, post-World War I. In addition, at the start of World War II, most nations were in a worldwide depression. This state of depression, made it easier for aggressive and charismatic rulers to take control over weak nations. The people hoped the powerful rulers would help to fix and change the economy. Many of the great powers thought it was a good idea to give into appeasement. On the other hand, many disagreed and argued that by giving into one demand today would cause the nation to weaken “tomorrow” (doc…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think the most effective response is with out a doubt collective security. (Doc 4) In 1938 Britain, France, and Italy met with Hitler to discuss his demand for the Sudetenland. Hitler got what he wanted from this meeting because of appeasement. Europe was happy from this because it avoided war. This did not benefit the Czechs at all though. For some reason Neville Chamberlain favored appeasement. (Doc 5) He thinks appeasement is the best way because he believes war is a "fearful thing." He thinks that appeasement will benefit Europe. Winston Churchill disagreed with Chamberlain's policy of appeasement. (Doc 6) He believed that keeping peace depends on holding back the aggressor. He also thinks we lost many opportunities in the quest for peace. He believes it was the people in control of our political affairs fault. Another view on appeasement was also put out there by A.J.P. Taylor. It stated that since the majority of German people put Hitler into power they were the only ones that could turn him out. Also he said some "appeasers" feared that the defeat of Germany would be followed by Russian domination over most of Europe. In another excerpt an author named Keith Eubank states that stopping Hitler prior to 1939 was not an issue. (Doc 9) He says that Hitler had too massive of a force and that nothing he had done had been considered that dangerous at that point in time. All this options but still if the rest of the country didn't do something besides just keeping appeasement Hitler was going to just keep demanding more and more. This would have left Europe ten times worse off. They made the right choice on going into Collective Security. They should have done this from the beginning instead of wasting so much time and losing so much, to just end up going into war anyways, just later in time. Collective Security…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the Paris Peace Conferences, Britain, under the leadership of George Wilson had a hidden agenda. Britain have felt that the Treaty of Versailles had been too harsh on the Germans, and considered appeasement as a method of correcting the wrongs that German had been dealt in the aftermath of World War I. Wilson did not want full-scale reparations imposed on Germany, because they were still valued as a significant trading partner. Such views continued until the end of Chamberlain’s rule in office. As many countries were trying to recover from the depression, Britain saw Germany as a valuable trading partner to get the economy going.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938. This is because It was based on the idea that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and, when his reasonable demands had been satisfied, he would stop. Appeasement was the only practical action that could be held during that time. England and France were not ready to get into another war. They already had severe damages that they couldn’t afford to get into another war. This gave them time to prepare for war since it is inevitable anyways. It also gave them time to prepare for old and broken equipment. Alliances needed to be made and through this, that was all possible. Also, through this policy, they were able to get public support. Appeasement also allowed Britain time to retool factories for war. Many Britons during that time saw Hitler as a defence against Russian Communism. This all happened because they thought that Hitler would soon be satisfied after remilitarizing the Rhineland, annexation of Austria and czechoslovakia. Wanted to please Hitler this way. The empire was already overstretched and its financial resources quite limited. The U.S. was isolationist. Soviet communism was feared, France was weak. This was all done to prevent war and preventing war is something needed to be done. Their objective was for the collaboration of all nations in building up a lasting peace for Europe. The Czechs, left themselves and told they were going to get no help from the Western Powers, would have been able to make better terms than they have got. This also gave the greatest chance of securing protection for the country. Czechoslovak State would’ve not been able to be an independent entity without this. Chamberlain remembered the slaughter of the…

    • 2172 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the key arguments for using appeasement at the time was because of Britain’s imperial, Economic and defence weaknesses. They had a lack of unity or coherent organisation in the empire therefore if they were to have to go to war they would not be ready. The threat of Arab and Indian nationalism would hinder this as soldiers would be needed to control rebellions and uprisings and that would mean less soldiers fighting in the war. The immense cost of world war one had made the cost of maintaining the empire, rearming and rebuilding Britain difficult as they would not be able to rearm fast enough to fight. There were also doubts of the integrity of the empire, would they even want to fight in another war to sort out something in Europe that has nothing really to do with them. The impact of world war one had made the GB feel vulnerable. Despite some recovery this decline continued raising fears bankruptcy if another war was declared Taking all this into account appeasement would seem the right way to go to help prevent war as Britain’s defence was weak and they were clearly not ready to fight in a war due to the mess of the empire and economic problems like the cost of war.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler demanded Danzig be given back to Germany so Britain offered protection to Poland. Britain and France realized their only hope was the Soviet Union. They were facing a German invasion much like other countries had previously. Hitler had promised a Thousand-Year Reign to his empire. However, Hitler got to them first and developed a pact with the Soviet Union. World War II began in 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. Two days later Britain and France retaliated and declared war on Hitler’s Nazi states (Duiker & Spielvogel,…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chamberlain suggested appeasement in hopes of keeping peace and avoiding war. He wanted to avoid war for as long as possible and keep the Europe out of war unless a bigger reason arose.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was the policy to accompanied by the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain. The aim was to try and reach an agreement with Germany to try and settle its trouble once and for all. It was based on the opinion that Germany had valid complaints as the terms of Versailles were very harsh and that it was not worth going to war over distant territories and that would be difficult to critical to defend. Britain had made a deal to Hitler in hope that would be satisfied. In the final stage, it gave Britain time to rearm and prepare for war if it came to that.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, another reason why I think that the Policy of Appeasement was the right thing do is because the Allies countries would need more time, should a war start again. Canada and much of the World has just come out of the Great Depression. Many countries had a lack of jobs, not a lot of money, and people in their own country was suffering. Also, World War 1 just ended only about 20 years back and so men in the army were scarce. Many men who had joined the army had died, or gotten injured. The countries would need more time to raise money, build an army, recruit men, make guns, and anything else needed for war. If the allies went to war at that point in time, without getting ready, they were guaranteed for a loss. The army generals of Britain even told Chamberlain, the Prime Minister of Britain is 1938 that “ If war with Germany has to come, it would be better to fight in six to twelve months…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A temporary truce that allows a person to received what’s requested, before an even greater conflict emerged. Issuing appeasement to Germany multiple times, it was considered useless. Since Adolf Hitler, would still invade countries among it border, even though he’s only allowed to have a portion of it. Meaning, that Appeasement was only an excuse to escape conflict with the German. And is only a cowardly move, which resulted to a war in 1937.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler wanted to expand the German land for economic means and used the Treaty of Versailles as an excuse to invade Poland. Hitler demanded more out of the French and British Governments, and they decided to give a small portion of Czechoslovakia; Hitler wasn’t satisfied; he invaded the whole of Czechoslovakia in 1939. The French and British Governments at the time didn’t want a repeat of World War I and had an intention of appeasing Hitler to stop further…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays