It has been brought to my attention that due to the recent downsizing of the company, People.com, and the subsequent layoffs, there are some questions regarding employee reviews and how they are interpreted. I have reevaluated the review process and I feel that the supervisors are not accurately measuring the employees' performances and need to be trained on the proper ways to complete the company reviews. There are many problems that can arise when a supervisor completes a performance review. In this training proposal, I will outline a few of the problems and make suggestions to correct and implement them.…
The performance appraisal, when properly carried out, can help to fine tune and reward the performance of present employees. Strengths of the negotiated performance appraisal are its ability to promote candid two-way communication between the supervisor and the person being appraised and to help the latter take more responsibility for improving performance. In contrast, in the traditional performance appraisal, the supervisor acts more as a judge of employee…
. Why might some supervisors consider it risky to place decision-making authority in the hands of employees?…
A manager rating an employee more severely than their work performance merits will create a frustrated and disgruntled employee. Workers will resent the unfair assessment of their performance. The opposite is also true, if a manager rates an employee more favourably than their performance merits “cheats them and the department of the benefits of exploring areas for improvement and the opportunities for developing and coaching” (MacKenzie, 2013)…
Performance reviews play an important role in the overall objective of performance management. Performance reviews serve as a tool to help employees improve their overall standards by helping them realize their full potential, and also provides information to employees and managers for decision-making. Reviews provide reasons employees changed positions whether they needed more training or promotion, or needed to be let go. They provide feedback to employees, provide developmental needs, and help spot organizational problems. Using the management by objective (MBO) process establishes objectives that employees need to accomplish and sets agreeable standards by both employee and management. I suggest having immediate supervisors, self-appraisals, and customer feedback to evaluate performance. The supervisors or direct managers are most familiar with the individual’s performance. “Self-appraisals give the employee the opportunity to rate themselves in regards to their job performance.” (Cascio, 2013) It provides the opportunity to be involved in the performance appraisal process. Customer feedback is also very useful input for employment decisions, such as promotion, transfer and training…
Even though performance appraisals can be good for the organization, it can also be a controversial management tool. Critics of performance appraisals have many compelling arguments against its use. They can have a false degree of accuracy, engenders dysfunctional employee conflict and competition, assigns an inordinate amount of responsibility to individual with poor work performance. Many will argue that these negative effects of appraisal can be fixed through genuine employee participation.…
An organization uses a performance management as a tool to examine and evaluate rather and employee’s work behavior is meeting standards. There are job descriptions set for each position within an organization. To measure an employee’s performance, the organization uses a performance appraisal system. This system determines rather the person being appraised will need additional training or, is not right for the position. This paper will discuss an organizations need, as well as purpose for a performance appraisal system. It will also discuss the requirements necessary to have an effective performance appraisal and some of the possible limitations.…
Performance appraisals are essential for the effective management and evaluation of employees. The 360-degree feedback is one of the applications of performance management. As it is mentioned in the textbook, “The 360-degree feedback approach involves collecting performance information not just from the supervisor but from anyone else who might have firsthand knowledge about the employee’s performance behaviors.” Typically, these other sources of information about the employee’s performance come from his peers, subordinates, and customers.…
Performance appraisal is considered a key tool for managerial needs of today’s organizations and is the process by which organizations evaluate job performance. A performance appraisal system usually requires a manager to rate each employee’s performance according to performance criteria’s that have already been established over a period of time. Performance appraisal systems also provide a basis for planning improvement as well as means for determining merit increases, transfers and even dismissals. The most important purpose or goal of the appraisal is to improve performance and hence productivity in the future. Performance appraisals allow employees to see where they are at and managers can get valuable information from employees to help them make employee's jobs more productive. As a result of appraisals, managers’ control over work and results may increase, problems can be identified early, employees are motivated by being allowed to input into and own their objectives, enhances communication, objective feedback given back to employees, facilitates decision making in regard to pay scale and promotion, centralized record of performances.…
The evaluation by the supervisor of the staffs strengths and weaknesses must remain bias free in order to work properly. Supervisors must evaluate the areas of performance that needs improvement and discuss how to improve the areas. Certain criteria within the ratings have to be established in order to reward performance effectively. Rating multiple traits make up a good performance appraisal system. The key element in the rating system consists of remaining honest through the entire performance…
Performance appraisal is an opportunity for an employee or those employees who are concerned with their performance, to get engaged in a dialogue with their reporting supervisors about their performance and development and the support required from their reporting supervisors to improve their performance. Performance appraisal is an important part of the performance management strategy. Performance appraisal is only one of the aspects of the performance management process. Since, performance appraisal is carried out by the line manages rather than the HR professionals it is very important for them to understand their role in managing overall performance of employees in their organisation. It is very important for line managers to identify that performance appraisal is not just about assessing the past but also about driving behaviour that will sustain performance in the future (CIPD factsheet; May 2011). This essay will attempt to describe the problems associated with performance appraisal systems and how can organisations overcome the problem by improvements to their design and implementation in reference with the orthodox and the radical critiques of performance appraisal.…
Many organizations use a combination of evaluations; depending on the size of the organization, as tools to identify needs within the company to show weaknesses or strengths of an employee, or of the organization, that is being evaluated. The correct evaluation used and the correct rating scale depend on the number of employees doing the same job, size of the organization, and ultimately the amount of money, time, and resources that an organization wants to spend on the evaluations (“Employee Performance Evaluations,” n.d.).…
References: Brown, M. & Benson, J. (2005). Managing to Overload? Work Overload and Performance Appraisal Processes. Group & Organization Management. 30, (1), 99-113. Cascio, W. & Aguinis, H.(2005). Applied psychology in human resource management. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Deblieux, M. (2003). Performance appraisal source book. Alexandria, VA: SHRM. Ducharme, M. & Singh, P. & Podolsky, M (2005). Exploring the Links Between Performance Appraisals and Pay Satisfaction. Compensation and Benefits Review, 37, (5), 46-52. Elicker, J. & Levy, P. & Hall, R (2006). The Role of Leader-Member Exchange in the Performance Appraisal Process. Journal of Management, 32, (4), 531-551. Fiorenza, N. (2007). Tuning-Up Performance. Printing Impressions, 49, (8), 54-55. French, W.L.,(2007). Human resource management. Sixth edition. Houghton Mifflin Company. Boston, New York. Grote, R. (2002). The performance appraisal question and answer book, A survival guide for managers. New York: AMACOM. Houldsworth, E. (2007). Measuring and Managing Performance. Personnel Today, January, 24-25. Kirkpatrick, D. (2006). Training and Performance Appraisal – Are They Related? T+D, 60, (9), 44-45. Lee, C.D. (2006). Feedback, Not Appraisal. HR Magazine, 51, (11), 111-114. Miller, C.E. & Thornton, C.L. (2006). How accurate are your performance appraisals? Public Personnel Management, 35, (2), 153-155. Mujtaba, B. G. (2008). Coaching and Performance Management: Developing and Inspiring Leaders. ILEAD Academy Publications; Davie, Florida, USA. ISBN: 978-0-9774211-4-5. Mujtaba, B. G., (2007). Mentoring diverse professionals (2nd edition). ILEAD Academy, Davie, Florida. Riverbark, L. (2006). Performance: Creating The Performance-Driven Organization. HR Magazine, 51, (12), 11…
They help supervisors evaluate and measure employee performance, provide continual feedback, and recognize and reinforce positive performance. Management should performe annual performance of evaluations to their employees. It should be an on going process. In order for any performance of evaluation system to work, supervisors must regularly evaluate employee performance and not put off reviewing employees until their review dates. They must also engage in ongoing communication with their subordinates regarding performance issues. Properly utilizing performance of evaluations measure employee and supervisor performance. Many managers view performance of evaluations as a record of employee performance only. However, performance of evaluations also reflect how well supervisors communicate and otherwise relate to their…
Different aspects come into play when dealing with leadership. The different situations of employees is one of the most compelling and strenuous trait to deal with. Some believe that it is easier and better to take an individual with a poor performance and give them a decent review so it doesn’t generate any whistle blowing. It is the result of such leadership studies…