Professor Miller
English 1101
April 20, 2011
Are we innately bound to corrupt ourselves?
In the seventeenth century some rich and poor set of in the Mayflower to escape from a Puritan king whose religious belief was enforced to all. Now although there were other reasons for escaping from England the goal was clear, establish a new home without an oppressing king and more opportunities for everyone. What would develop from then on would be called the bill of rights, which declared the freedom and rights of all man. Time was spent to make sure that what they experienced in under the crown would never happen again. They were almost certain that everyone as people could live harmoniously in respect for one another, but could we? Should man really be trusted with freedom, or are we doomed to corrupt any good we’re given?
The freedom of the press was initially made in order to allow people to be aware of what’s going on in their country or neighborhood. The death of Princess Diana was a controversial and tragic time. Paparazzi takes advantage of the law freedom of the press by making the life of celebrities miserable, celebrities are being watched and followed by paparazzi every minute of their life. Sometimes paparazzi abuse of their rights by invading …show more content…
Let the human emotions and one’s ego get a foot in the door and even a straight A student who wears the wrong type of clothes can be searched under someone’s interpretation of probable cause. I can speak from experience about giving someone probable cause simply because of the way I looked and where I was at a certain time. I suppose I could understand a police officer’s point of view considering the fact that many people play the race card in order to conceal either drugs or a weapon. Once again the folly of man makes us grab something meant to protect us or help us into something