Argument On The WISC-IV Test

On the WISC-IV test, John scores was sufficient on his examination. John’s Verbal Comprehension (standard deviation of 81) was low average. He does have the ability to interpret and analyze written information, but just not as much as others can. On his perceptual reasoning (sd of 71) was classified as borderline. It’s possible that John may have a nonverbal learning disability. His working memory (sd of 68) and processing speed (sd of 62) was both scored extremely low. His low score on working memory could be a high risk factor for learning or academic difficulties. John has ADHD that could have been an effect and reason for his low score on processing speed. The Full scale IQ standard deviation score was 65, and was classified as extremely low for John. John struggles in class and have trouble following directions and staying on task with his classmates. This could be one reason for his extremely low score on FSIQ.
John’s Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement was mostly classified as lower extreme, except for Nonsense Word Decoding. He scored a standard deviation of 69 on the measures of letter and word recognition and is rated as extremely low. Perhaps John does not know how
He had higher scores on his WISC-IV test than KTEA-II test. However, most John’s scores are extremely low. His academic skills are at a high risk of poor academic performance for his grade level. His intellectual ability is not as hazardous as his academic performance, but still cause harm to his future intellectual abilities. His working memory in WISC-IV test corresponds to KTEA-II test. Having a good memory is very important to scoring well on academic tests. The scores are different but majority of the score categories are basically the same. They specify the abilities that John does have and do not have. He is aware of his settings, and have some of the basic knowledge and meanings of the both of the assessments that he was