First, the penny costs more to produce than it is worth. The penny costed 1.8 cents to make in 2010, and 4 billion pennies were made, so money was squandered. According to the 2010 US mint report, the average cost of a penny was 1.79 cents. This shows the penny costed more to make than it is worth, …show more content…
As mentioned before, half cents retained their worth and could be used as they were before, but when used would be sent back to the government to be melted down. The pennies would follow suit, similar to the half cent’s process. Therefore, pennies would retain their value. Also, some may say, abolishing the penny is discourteous to Abraham Lincoln. However, this is not true, because we have the $5 bill and the US military already abolished the penny in overseas bases. “In the 1980s, U.S. military bases overseas banned the penny and began rounding all transactions up or down to the nearest five cents. This is the system Canada plans to implement later this year” (History.com). This quote is showing that the US military already abolished the penny, and our neighbor to the north already abolished the penny, too. Therefore, abolishing the penny is not disrespectful to Abraham Lincoln.
In conclusion, the penny should be abolished because they cost more to make than they are worth, we already banned a coin without bad side effects, and most arguments against it have solutions. The penny wasted 3.16 billion dollars in 2010. The half cent was banned without difficulties. Most arguments have counterarguments that solve it. So now you know the penny should be abolished, but what if you knew the nickel costs 9 cents to