Preview

Argumentative Essay On Bioenhancements

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
695 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay On Bioenhancements
A famous Catholic televangelist, Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, once said that “there are millions of people who hate what they wrongly to believe to be the Catholic Church,” and in in a world where bioenhancements are becoming a promising aspect of science and technology due to the rapid improvements of technology within the last decade, I believe bioenhancements will soon be an ethical issue in society and that the Catholic Church teaching of bioenhancements should be addressed and clarified. In themselves, bioenhancements combine our human biology with technology, creating a human machine, and some people may disagree with this integration of technology and our human nature. Human nature is a topic often discussed in bioethics, often in a religious …show more content…

I find it only right for society and the Church to formulate a teaching on bioenhancements before the technology comes to full fruition and to assist people in articulating why the Church believes it. Previous teachings of the Church can be used in the formation of this Church doctrine, such as the instructions on the dignity of human life, humans being made in the image and likeness of God and ones concerning human fallenness and finitude. With this in mind, I argue in this essay that the Catholic Church would generally be against bioenhancements in its teaching, which would concern the dignity of the human person, human finitude and fallenness, and humans being created in the image and likeness of God (imago dei). It is arguable, however, in the subject of bioethics that dignity is crucial to Catholic teaching. An important addition in this argument is to note the contrast between therapy and enhancements through defining and explaining each in terms of Church teaching. Bioenhancements attempt to reject the Catholic beliefs of dignity in the imago dei, and our finitude and fallenness, and for this reason bioenhancement technologies would be generally unacceptable in the Church except for the possibilities of the technology being used in the future to benefit

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Humans are on a constant quest in the search for perfection and advancement in all areas of life through progressive scientific knowledge. From such a stance, the future of humans appears boundless with all the potential possibilities biotechnology provides, but such developments will cause ethical, social and biological implications.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weikart has also written The Death of Humanity: And the Case for Life which discusses ideologies that have contributed to the decline of the Judeo-Christian sanctity-of-life ethic. Weikart’s purpose of the article is to inform the audience about the science sanction euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. In the article, Weikart talks about Ernst Haeckel, a biologist, and his idea to kill infants with disabilities. Haeckel’s reasoning of his idea was because he was afraid that the disabled would weaken the process of evolving for humans and insisted that Darwinism is crucial. He decides that euthanasia would be beneficial to help his process and relates it to Germany and Hitler’s proposal. The article also talks about we should use our technology to benefit…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hsc Exams

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Christianity today is a living tradition which requires contribution and commitment through adherents. It’s through Pope John XXIII a modern day Christian role model, he’s changes have impacted Christian adherents through modernising the church, which is considered “perhaps the greatest revolution of Catholicism of the modern era”. However through traditional practices such as ‘Sunday worship’ it allows adherents to show their faith towards God. It’s through here adherents learn of Christian ethic guidelines on issues in Bioethical teachings such as Organ donation and Euthanasia.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the development of genetic modification scientists have created a chicken that has a dinosaur leg in a reverse evolution experiment, a goat that produces spider silk, featherless chicken, glow in the dark cats, sheep and monkeys and recently in February 2016 British scientists were granted permission to genetically modify human embryos. Just as Etienne Geoffroy St. Hilaire and his son Isidore Geoffroy St. Hilaire created malformations in chicken embryos, scientists in the 21st century are creating malformations in animals in the name of science – for “the good” of human beings. Wherever a person situates themselves in time, whether it is in the 18th century or 21st century, people need to understand that there will always be consequences for what we choose to do with the knowledge we gain. Knowledge can create and knowledge can destroy- both in the physical realm and in the moral realm. Morally speaking, knowledge can change how individuals (and collectively human beings) view themselves in the world and how individuals view other animals and material things in the…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article, Designer Babies, is said to be written by the Future of Human Evolution Team so some, but not all collaborators include Bradley LaChance, the executive director of the Center for Evolutionary Technologies where he researches human advancement through technological advancements. Also, Norell Hadzimichalis, who has a PhD in molecular biology and has done postdoctoral research in neuroscience labs. Her experience and education is very helpful in writing this article. In the article, both sides of the argument are presented through problems and benefits with the technology and the role it has in society is explained. First of all, the problem of what to do with the failed embryos arises. Some people believe simply discarding them is an action too similar to abortion and therefore the process of genetically engineering embryos is not ethical, but a person’s opinion ultimately determines if they are pro-choice or pro-life.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stem cells, often called the building blocks of the human body, are positioned within the body’s blood, tissues, organs, and immune system. Once they are transplanted, they have the capability to either reconstruct or restore a patient’s damaged cells which could enhance the patient’s health; and in some cases can conclusively save a person’s life.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you feel if I told you that the food you're eating was made in a science lab? Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, are the outcome of a laboratory process where genes from the DNA of one species are extracted and artificially manipulated into the genes of an uncorrelated plant or animal. Crops are often genetically modified to be resistant to pesticides so farmers would be able to spray them without harming the crop itself. However, there are many consequences regarding consumers’ health and environmental problems. Many people question the safety of consuming genetically modified organisms. Companies should acknowledge that their product is genetically modified by placing a label on the product because customers have a right to know. Furthermore, there are several serious health complications that may rise to the consumer. And finally, genetically modifying organisms should be limited by being placed in a controlled environment to prevent contamination with other species because it can be harmful to the environment in several ways.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What right does man have to accuse another of such a dastardly feat? It is nearly an undoubtable fact that one day man and technology will form a unity and biotechnology will become integrated into everyday life. Man has no right to play God, but man also has no right to attack every technological breakthrough with controversy and radical accusations. “Playing God” is a cliché that has become all too common in the present day. Man has every natural right to alter and improve itself as a race through biomedical augmentations. It is inevitable that technological breakthroughs will have widespread effects on the fields of biology and physiology. Biotechnological developments will also lead to grave changes in global commerce and consumerism within a span as short as the next 20 years. Theological and ethical arguments against replacing the natural human form do not possess the factual backing, nor the rationale, to effectively make the accusation that man is “playing God” with its inevitable biotechnologies and procedures. The human body has near-unlimited capabilities as a biotechnological receptor, and the possibility that this will become a reality is up to society. If humanity can accept the technologic lifestyle it is destined toward, then ethical debates and moral rationales will finally stop getting in the way of scientific…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetically Modified Organisms have become a scientific phenomenon in curing world hunger. Unfortunately, over one billion people fall victim to one of the world’s leading causes of death, malnourishment. Many critics believe that GMOs do not provide enough nutrients and “good stuff”, therefore they believe that many people consuming GMOs are in danger. Others say that GMOs can fix world hunger because they can produce hundreds of GM foods at a time. My side is to believe that GMO shouldn’t be used to solve the problem of world hunger.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Macklin, R., “Why We Should Regulate—But Not Ban—the Cloning of Human Beings,” Testimony presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 14, 1997. Macklin, R., "Splitting embryos on the slippery slope: Ethics and public policy," Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 4: 209-226, 1994. Mill, J.S., On Liberty (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Publishing, 1859). National Institutes of Health, Report of the Human Embryo Research Panel (Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1994). Nussbaum, M.C., “Aristotelian social democracy,” inLiberalism and the Good 203, R. Bruce Douglass, et al., (eds.), pp. 217-226, 1990. Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984). Posner, R, Sex and Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992). Radin, M., “Reflections on Objectification,”65 Southern California Law Review 341 (November 1991). Radin, M., “The Colin Ruagh Thomas O 'Fallon Memorial Lecture on Personhood,” 74 Oregon Law Review 423 (Summer 1995). Rhodes, R. "Clones, harms, and rights,"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4:285-290, 1995. Robertson, J.A., "A Ban on Cloning and Cloning Research is Unjustified," Testimony Presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 14, 1997. Robertson, J.A., "The question of human cloning,"Hastings Center Report 24:6-14, 1994. Robertson, “The scientist’s right to research: A constitutional analysis,51 Southern California Law Review 1203, 1977. Rothenberg, K., Testimony before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, March 12, 1997. Schwartz, H., The Culture of Copy (New York: Zone Books, 1996).…

    • 11085 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genesis 1:1, “In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth” (NIV). This is a statement from the Bible claiming that there is a god who created everyone and everything on this Earth. This has been an unsolved argument since the beginning of time. Whether or not God exists this argument isn’t based on Him. It's based whether knowledge or belief is the best way to view things. Saying something like, God created the world, you would have to rely on how strong your faith is. Belief isn’t based off of facts. Knowledge is the facts, scientists usually rely on this. The conclusion of evolution is based off of evidence. Both by knowledge and faith you can draw up conclusions, but for conclusions like how the world started, how we came…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It was at first shocking to see that the practice of eugenics survived so deep into the 20th century, but it was also surprsing to see that there is still no concrete resoltuion. Many techinical and ethical issues are raised by this case.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The world that human is living today is fulfilled with technology. The scope of such technological applications is not limited in one specific field. To be more specific,, technology can be used in the teaching area, agricultural development, aerospace engineering, medical science and service industry etc, which brings a substantial number of benefits. However, technology itself is a double-edged sword. When engaged in medical treatment and personal benefits, some people are skeptical about the practicability and feasibility of using technology to improve one’s mental or physical abilities. Some opponents might claim that people are born with given characteristics and it is morally unacceptable to change the intrinsic properties.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Are we Playing God?”, do we have the right to manipulate people’s genes? These are some of the ethical questions raised by Christians. They believe that humans exist in God’s world and have no right to change it (“Moral”). People also argue that the human genome was given to you from birth and that it was generated by God. If we begin changing genes then it brings us back to ‘“playing God’”. Although these are popular questions that are asked about gene therapy, the most popular one and simple one is the safety of gene therapy. Although gene therapy has vastly improved there is still a possibility for error. The most fearful part is that the therapy works with your genes and chromosomes and people are afraid that instead of treating the genes, the doctors could…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays