Preview

Argumentative Essay On Gun Laws

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
644 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay On Gun Laws
If you have heard about the Las Vegas Shooting, the Sandy Hook Shooting or the Orlando Night Club Shooting then you know that many innocent lives were taken because of someone who abused the right to have a gun. These are some of the worst shootings in America that have so many people questioning if we should put stricter laws on guns. Some would say that having stricter laws on guns or having no guns at all would make America safer, but putting harsh laws on guns will not result in anything positive. Guns are one of the best ways of protection and they are not the objects that do the killing, people kill other people. America does not need stricter laws on gun control. To begin with, guns are one of the greatest forms of protection there is. Many forms of security like the Secret Service and police officers have guns to protect people like the president and people like us. It is a part of the Second Amendment to bear arms. It is our right to have guns for protection against harm or people that may harm us. “According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), guns are used for self-defense 2.5 million times a year” …show more content…
Guns do not automatically shoot themselves and kill masses of people, there always has to be someone else shooting the gun. Whether there is a motive or not for the killings, someone is always in charge of the gun and are choosing to shoot others. We tend to blame the killings on the guns because we don't want to think that there are bad people in the world that are capable of doing a heinous crime. Acts of murder and suicide are not going to end because people think taking away guns will help with death counts and mass killings, people are still in charge of what they do to themselves and others. America should not punish the people who actually use their weapons for protection just because others abuse the law. You can not blame the guns for people killing other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Washington DC – -(Ammoland.com)- For decades, gun-grabbers have been using the “gun show loophole” to push their gun control agenda.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Accord

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Prices and Incomes Accord was an agreement between the Australian Council of Trade Unions and the Australian Labor Party government in1983. The Accord developed at a time when the only response to inflation appeared to be to slow down the economy. Employers were not party to the Accord. Unions agreed to restrict wage demands and the government pledged to minimize inflation. The government was also to act on the social wage. At its broadest this concept included increased spending on education as well as welfare. This was seen as a method to reduce inflation without reducing the living standards of Australians. At the beginning of the Accord, only one union, voted against the Accord. The Accord continued for the whole period of the Labor government through seven stages including, after 1993, enterprise bargaining.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    All in all, it is not a good choice for American society at the present stage to ban gun. From the constitutional view, Gun Ban is contrary to the constitution of human rights and protection spirit; from the political view, it will increase the risk of tyranny; from the economic view, it will lead criminal squares to become one of the guns of the monopolist; from the social reality view, it leads to the lack of citizen means of self-defense; finally, from social culture view, it does not conform to the American culture tradition and social psychology. I think the key to the problem of gun crime is not the gun itself, but the deep problems of the society, such as poverty, social life and so on. I think gun control is just a…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that the citizens of the United States have the right to bear arms, or keep weapons. This means that our forefathers made sure that legally we would be able to have the right to protect ourselves. According to the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, “Self-defense is a fundamental right.” (Pros). Almost half of Americans agree with this statement, and 67 percent of people who own guns claim that…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why is gun control the supposed “cure” for crime? Why is there always this need to blame guns for people’s crimes? If this theory is correct, then the belief that pencils cause grammatical errors is also true; wait, that doesn’t sound right, does it? Now, all of a sudden when the “cure” is used in this light it becomes ridiculous. In fact, Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns, and stricter laws and licensing will not effectively save lives.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control should not be in force because it only affects the people who follow the laws. If weapons were banned, that is, putting gun control into effect, the people who follow laws won’t be able to protect themselves from people who don’t abide by the laws. The main purposes of fire arms is self- protection and hunting. So if the government tries to take our weapons away from us we can just throw the 2nd amendment at them and tell them that this is unconstitutional. We understand they are trying to cut down on crime, but it is actually making the crime rates go up. In Britain the government thought it would bring the crime/murder rate down but, it actually increased about 1 million more deaths each year. The government is trying to get is ammo they are trying to limit ammo manufactures to a certain amount of ammo a day. They are also making people go into havoc and making them go crazy over ammo, so people are buying…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your home alone on a cool quiet night; you roll over and witness a large individual kick in your door with a twelve gauge shotgun. You hear him coming up the stairs, what do you do? Run? Call the police, or do you grab your gun and protect you and your children. Now if you were to take the gun out of the situation what would you have done? The intruder is already in your house where your kids sleep at night, and the police's response time is not going to be fast enough. What if you were able to hide, well you can not hide forever and eventually he will find you. No matter what you think, or how you feel about guns; if you were to put yourself in that position. You would be very grateful for the gun that saved you and your precious children.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, I believe that Americans should be able to own guns and not have their 2nd amendment infringed upon because the 2nd amendment says “ The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This implies that the people of the U.S can have weapons to defend themselves and no further. Now obviously there is flaws to this as there is criminals that use weapons for horrible acts, but we have people that own guns to protect themselves from the criminals in which case a weapon is used in self defence and not to commit an act of crime. As well as people who use them to protect themselves it is also not meant to kill the gun for example is something that doesn’t kill the user of the…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A gun is a weapon consisting of a metal tube, with mechanical attachments, from which projectiles are shot by the force of an explosive; a piece of ordnance (Dictionary.com). Today, there has been a lot of controversy on gun control. This controversy has arisen due to the increased gun violence crime rate. Even though guns are often viewed as bad, many people rely on them for protection. It states in our second amendment that we have the right to bear arms, although people have misused guns, taking them away will lead to a decrease in self protection. “Our Second Amendment right not only states “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” but more importantly for this issue, “shall not be infringed” (The Times News).” Even though we have our rights, guns are not unlimited. With this controversial issue there is much to consider when creating new laws and guidelines.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Approximately 30,000 people die a year because of guns when they are used in both self defense and murder. Many people argue whether restrictions on guns should be enacted or repealed. Tensions have grown high on both sides of the issue making it a hot topic in our country today. Many people cast their votes in the last election based on their feelings about this very issue. The divide among Americans when it comes to gun control is large, spanning from those who want strict regulation, including an outright ban on all firearms, to those who want complete legalization of individual gun ownership. Guns can be used for killing or protection, so it is important to examine all…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the NRA (National Rifle Association), guns are used for self-defense 2.5 million times a year. (www.gun-control.procon.org). This shows that there is a need for guns, and they are used for self-defense and protection. If guns are used that many times a year for self-defense, then there is a purpose for them and why there shouldn’t be any more stricter gun control laws. 61% of man and 86% of women said “stricter gun control laws would make obtaining guns and protecting themselves, more difficult”(www.gun-control.procon.org). This proves that gun owners believe these laws will make it difficult to protect them. The right to protect one’s self shouldn’t be made…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have a natural right with the Second amendment. Nelson Lund, a Professor at George Mason University School of Law, once stated how, “The right to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a basic natural right that grows out of the right to life and many gun control laws interfere with the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves against violent criminals” (Gun Control - ProCon). People have a right to safety, and a right to defend themselves. Many citizens acknowledge and defend this right. By implements stricter gun laws the only thing being done is taking away some people's ability to defend themselves against others who won't follow any laws put into place. This walks hand in hand with the second amendment, which “protects an individual’s right to own guns” and states that guns are needed for self-defense from threats ranging from local criminals to foreign invaders. Along with the fact that gun ownership deters crime rather than causes more crime (Second Amendment). America was built upon freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and even the freedom to own guns and protect oneself from whomever may pose a threat. Bad people with guns can only be fought against by good people with the same abilities to have guns. Along with this the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the fundamental right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense (Second Amendment). The second amendment is not the only amendment that protects a humans right to bear arms, here are other amendments this country was built upon that protect an american's right to protect…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Persuasive

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe that guns should not be banned in the US. “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” I am sure most of us have heard this saying at some point in our lives. Surely, it is a statement of the obvious, but the logic behind it rings true. It may seem rational to ban guns entirely to prevent people from killing, but it is not the guns themselves that are the problem. That is just a simple solution to a complex problem. The criminals who kill others are willing to break the law and risk going to prison for the rest of their lives to murder, yet they are expected to follow firearm laws? If a nationwide gun ban is enacted, criminals will not suddenly follow the law and reject the thought of buying a firearm on the black market. Banning all guns in the United States would be irrational because it would not lower crime or prevent firearm-related murders.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the biggest controversial topics in America today is Gun Control, whether we should or should not have gun control. The Government claims that if they take the guns away, that there will be a drop in deaths and crimes. The Second Amendment state that every citizen of the United States of America has a right to bare arms(ProCon#1). The Gun Control Law will take away that right completely, along with some of our freedom. If the Gun Control Law is enforced in the United States, our hunting right will be removed, our self-defense right will be taken away, and it will amplify the problem.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays