Arguments Against Lgbtq

In This article, I can imagine the perspective from both sides and where they are coming from in their argument. The argument is severe and debatable because if they let the school stay up and running, it will provide a place for people who take religion seriously and people who feel uncountable around LGBTQ people to learn without having LGBTQ kids and or staff around. On the other hand, if the government lets it keep running it can fail to teach nonLGBTQ children that LGBTQ children are weird and inferior while making LGBTQ kids, and adults believe they are being discriminated against by the schools. The most worrisome outcome is that it will set an example to other schools that it would be fine to disobey that law resulting in it
becoming useless.

I believe that there is a way for both sides to achieve what they desire, despite my belief that the LGBTQ supporters are in the right. What I believe would be the best option if there are a hand full of schools for only LGBTQ kids along with a handful of government-approved schools where kids can go with no LGBTQ people. This idea would work because LGBTQ children would have a school with no discrimination and no bullying and kids that are against LGBTQ people could go to a school that fits their beliefs and preferences. It would not set an example that any school and become no LGBTQ, but, it will still give kids their favored environment. In the future, I trust that there will be more consideration on how to make a compromise instead of one side winning.