Preview

Arguments Against The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
856 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against The Constitution
“Anyone who listens to my teaching and follows it is wise, like a person who builds a house on solid rock. Though the rain comes in torrents and the floodwaters rise and the winds beat against that house, it won’t collapse because it is built on bedrock. But anyone who hears my teaching and doesn’t obey it is foolish, like a person who builds a house on sand. When the rains and floods come and the winds beat against that house, it will collapse with a mighty crash.” (Matthew 7:24-27)

In order for any home to stand you must have a foundation. For the United States of America that foundation is the constitution. It was the first of its kind and as such was created with the idea of change. The constitution was designed in order to apply to the
…show more content…
Despite technology allowing the people to communicate, more than ever we are divided. The blame here is not to be placed on ‘old documents’, but rather on the people itself. The Constitution, after all, was created to be a government ran for and by the people. In light of recent events the people have spoken and individual freedoms are being tested, such as freedom speech and press. During the the creation of the Constitution many of our founding fathers disagreed with one another. James Wilson believed in a strong central government while Thomas Jefferson believe there should be limited government with focus on human rights. Instead of insisting on silencing those who disagree the people welcome those with different opinions, because those “without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of speech” (Benjamin Franklin). It has been proven time and time again that with open speech the people allow for better and necessary change. The cause of ignorance is the lack of free speech, the lack of communication between people with differing views. As the products of a powerful nation we must lead by example when it comes to listening to different opinions. The voice of the people is what hold the government to the mark. Benjamin Franklin puts it best in stating “... those wretched countries where a man cannot call his tongue his own, he can scarce call anything his own. Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech”. Controversy, though the cause of conflicts, is necessary in any great nation to open up needed conversation which moves the modern world

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before we knew it as the United States Constitution, we all knew it as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was just too weak as in: each state had one vote in Congress, there was no executive branch to enforce laws passed by Congress, there was no national court system, and etc… Before it could be ratified there was great concern between the delegates that were present at the convention. The main concern they had was the type of legislature. The representatives of larger states wanted the seats in the legislature to be determined by the size of the state. The representatives from the smaller states wanted to have equal representation in Congress. They negotiated on this situation by allowing a bicameral legislature,…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787, the members of the Federal Convention knew that the Articles of Confederation were severely lacking what was essential for a successful government and nation. Knowing this, the convention looked to the past to construct a constitution for a young and ever changing country. The Founding Fathers’ were influenced by the Romans, the English and many others along the way, hoping that they would be more successful at producing liberty, order, and justice. The result is the long standing Constitution that has guided America and the government through the founding to present day.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philanthropos, the anonymous author of Antifederalist No. 7, wastes no time in making his argument against the ratification of the Constitution. His main argument is that the adoption of the Constitution, as it stood at the time before ratification, would lead to a civil war. He claims that “the time in which the constitution or government of a nation undergoes any particular change, is always interesting and critical.” As a result of this statement, the author goes on to argue that adopting the new Constitution will cause instability and unrest among the people, ultimately resulting in war. Philanthropos uses dramatic language and exaggerated claims in order to get his point across. An example of this comes when he states: “Were they mine enemies, the worst imprecation I…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S constitution was Americas founding document as it set up there key principles of freedom and democracy. When the founding fathers drew up the constitution their intention was that it would last the course of the U.S history. Many people firmly hold the view that U.S constitution does still work very well today as it restrains the power of government, it is highly adaptable for changing time and allowing power and rights to the states while still allowing the federal government to efficient and productive. However many people believe the U.S constitution has failed as it as many outdated amendments such as the 2nd amendment the right to bear arms. Also many Liberal Democrats argue that it leads to political gridlock much too often. Also on the other side of the coin many Republicans argue that it gives way too much power to government as judicial review for example is in the hands of just 9 Supreme Court justices.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 14th Amendment stands up for the rights of the citizens. According to dictionary.com, it is an amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868, defining citizenship and forbidding states to restrict the basic rights of citizens or other persons. In my opinion when it comes to the 14th Amendment and Gault’s confinement to an Industrial School, his rights were violated. I do not believe he was given a fair chance from the time he was picked up from his parent’s house because they should have been notified immediately and he should have had access to counsel before speaking.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution has many amendments that do not apply to today’s society. This document is known as a living document, named that because it was meant to be able to change every thirty or so years to keep along with the times. Many people think that the Constitution should never be changed because of its importance to the history of our country, but, Thomas Jefferson thought otherwise in 3 letters that he wrote to Maddison addressing the matter. From September of 1787 to today, America along with the rest of the world has made many advancements.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 10th amendment was written as the last amendment on the original Bill of Rights. It was added to assure the delegates from different states that the Federal Government would not step outside the boundaries established in the Constitution. It also helps define the concept of federalism, the relationship between Federal and state governments. Having said that, it would seem obvious that the state should be allowed the power to prevent or accept the use of marijuana for medical reasons. Most would agree but it is possible that others have a different opinion on the subject.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ratification of the Constitution can be said to be birthed out of necessity, therefore, not out of an earnest desire to create a federal system of government. The political discussion of that time is ironically, similar to the discussions of modern American society. How much is too much power? Is the government overreaching? Is the government doing enough to protect the vulnerable?…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution is supposedly the law of the land, right? Well America will soon find out how true that statement actually stands. “The right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed,” is part of the second amendment developed by the forefathers of this country (constitutioncenter.org). In the recent debates about gun control, the government is talking about taking away the rights that amendment gives citizens. This has recently become an issue because of all of the public shootings and crimes around the U.S. While something should be done to stop violent crimes and shootings, guns are not the issue and people refuse to understand is that it’s the person behind the gun that pulls the trigger not the gun itself.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil wars, secular turmoil, and contradicting opinions of the common people are actions prevalent in many countries around the world. As a result, constitutions and laws are always changing; What should be stable and firm is malleable and weak. In contrast, the United States, while being a relatively young country, has baffled many by the durability of the Constitution. The curiosity of how one could accomplish the creation of such a reliable and long-established document can be satiated by only looking as far as to why the Constitution was made- And who and what helped shape it.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As one of our country’s Founding Fathers, Thomas Jefferson, once said, "the beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." These debates are nothing new to Americans, because it has been in discussion since the colonial times of the United States. It would make no sense whatsoever to restrict the right to keep and bear arms to state governments, since the principle on which our policy is based, as stated in the Declaration, recognizes that any government, at any level, can become oppressive of our rights. Therefore, we must be prepared to defend ourselves against its abuses, but the movement against 2nd…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I understand reasons for adopting the constitution. It provides better communication between the national and state governments; this would allow the countries wealth to prosper. However, this could lead to the nation favoring larger states as they have more representation in the House of Representatives. This again would prove unfair for the smaller states like New Jersey due to the fact that a state like Virginia could receive more supplies as they are bigger and more powerful in the House of Representatives.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the end of the day, the freedom of the people does depend on those in power. If they are strong, the government itself may infringe liberties, and if they are weak, they can’t provide the safety to stop neighborhood rule by mafia types, talibans, feudal landlords or other repressive micro-organizations. Plato, who felt contempt for governments established by a vote of unqualified people, recommended that benevolent philosopher kings hold power.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for a society to be fully functional, the people who govern must be at peace with the governed, or else all hell breaks loose. For example, President Obama has recently passed the Health Care Bill that apparently would help turn the economy around, but reduce the social status of the middle class. According to polls, a majority of American’s did not approve of this bill as it was being passed, but there was no one person who stood up to say something to the president. The people must make their voices heard in order for a government to be stable and acceptable. To question the ideas of officials is only enhancing the final decision they are going to make, therefore bettering the country as a whole and putting the official in a favorable position amongst his people. As citizens, it is our right to input our opinions into the minds of our public leaders so that they are constantly thinking about what is best for all of us, not just for a specific section. If not, the government would become greedy and reap some of the benefits themselves and not make it known to the rest of society.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we fail to put into practice what we have heard from God, we only fool ourselves. He will require of us an accounting of what we did with everything we heard. If we make a habit of not doing what we are told, we soon become lawless, and eventually will be called “workers of inquity, or lawleseness” (Matthew 7:21-23). If we make a habit of not really listening, we will lose the power to hear. When the storm comes—and it does in every life—we will not be able to stand.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics