While Harris shared the ideals that Baroque was about realism, he also believed that Baroque was more than just trying to make art look real. Harris believed that Baroque art was to also embody emotions in it’s form, but not just any emotions. Baroque art was about “energy, emotion, drama, and even extravagance” (Harris xxiii). Not only was the painting or the sculpture supposed to look real, it was supposed to embody the emotions and energy of real life as well. This is somewhat similar to Neuman's idea of portraying different states of mind.
A third writer by the name of John Martin, also weighed in his own thoughts on what the goals and principal characteristics of Baroque art were. Martin believed that Baroque art was a ”genuine movement pathetically anchored in life” (Martin 116). This meant that Baroque was in fact a real movement of art, which in turn proved critics wrong who didn’t think that it was, but also a movement that was very weakly positioned having come just after the Renaissance. He also states that Baroque corrects critics and stands on it’s own from the other style that it was originally compared to, which was …show more content…
During this time, it became common practice for those looking to become an artist to study under the guidance of a master of art as an apprentice. To learn how to become a better artist, apprentices often copied the styles and masterpieces of famous artists that came before them. Artists found inspiration from these famous predecessors. This made it so that the styles that were popular during the Greek and Roman times were revitalized again during the Baroque and improved upon. Without this help from the fourteenth and fifteenth century artists, Baroque naturalism wouldn’t have been possible in painting, drawing or other two dimensional