Preview

Bush Doctrine And Just War Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
280 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bush Doctrine And Just War Theory
The Bush Doctrine and Just War Theory (words count 269)
Is the Bush doctrine one of preemption or prevention? Why is this distinction important? The bush doctrine is more prevention than preemption. His speech was more about prevention. He made a statement that we must prevent terrorisms and regimes weapons from threatening the United States and the world. He claimed that we can’t sit back and wait for them to attack us again. We must not wait and give them the chance to take us down. We should make them fear us. He was determined to prevent another terrorist attack to the United States. Bush considers the 9/11 attack as a potential threat. It was capable of happening again. He wanted to eliminate a possible future threat. Based on his interpretations,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Article II of the United States Constitution gives the president the role of ‘Commander-in-Chief’ of the US’s Armed Forces, and this role provides the basis for rapid and effective decision-making, whilst maintaining the credibility of the USA’s foreign policy on the world stage. However, there are certain constraints on the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief’. One constraint on this power is that only Congress has the power to declare war. Congress can also authorise the president to deploy his country’s armed forces. Since the Constitution was created, Congress has only declared war a total of five times (in both World Wars, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, and the Spanish-American War), and this power has not been used since 1941. These authorisations are ordered by the President however, showing just how interlinked the powers of the president and Congress really are. One example of when the timing of a congressional authorisation can be crucial is the vote on action against Iraq, a few months before the 2002 midterm elections. This congressional authorisation was manipulated by George W Bush, and shows that the president can take advantage of this and make a decision with a Congress that has a majority of his party as members, rather than waiting until after a midterm when he might not be so sure as to have a key decision go his way. The relationship between Congress and the president was confirmed by the War Powers Act of 1973, passed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the War Powers Resolution, the Commander in Chief can only send American personnel abroad to take military action against another country only with a declaration of war from Congress. However, according to “statutory authority” or in the case of an attack on the United States, the president reserves the right to take action against a sovereign country, given that the president has issued a forty-eight hour notice to Congress, and the personnel remain active for no longer than sixty days. This important resolution severely limits the power of the Commander in Chief, and lays within the system of checks of balances which is vitally integral to the United States government.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Sanitary Commission was a known profit organization that was sanctioned by the U.S. government in 1861 to help provide supplies and aid to the medical corps. It was not the first organization of its kind but it was the first to have a major and lasting effect on the army. The Sanitary Commission aided soldiers, supplied hospitals with the necessary supplies and provided an efficient means for smaller local aid societies to distribute their supplies. They also created many of the guidelines that helped to shape todays modern medical care and began the project of organizing and recording patients’ needs and recovery times. However, such a large organization that was maintained primarily by volunteers couldn’t buy all the supplies it needed by itself. They of course had the help of those other smaller aid societies scattered across the north and mid-west but they could only supply so much. The Commission needed a way to help encourage more people to give. Especially during the more trying and difficult times of the war when morale was lowest among citizens. So they created what they called Sanitary Fair’s to help raise money to pay for medical supplies, transportation and other essential materials that they would use in both battlefield and camp hospitals.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The President of the United States is a very important and strong leader that does not have the right to officially go to war without the approval of Congress. This law is dubbed the War Powers Act since it states that the President has to notify Congress when sending troops to hostilities and if in a state of emergency, 42 hours after (SAS Institute Inc). Presidents in the past, like President Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, have argued that by enforcing the War Powers Act, Congress is taking away constitutional authorities that have been exercised for many years. On the other hand, people, such as George Mason, claim that giving the power to declare war to one singular person is a very untrustworthy situation (SAS Institute Inc). This argument…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    His strategy was formed with his creation of homeland security department. When the conflict rage on the United States Military became transfering fighter and suspects . That is where prisoner was held in their enemy combatants. Many of the subject to enhanced interrogation techniques. Bush announced the united states would preemptively use military force only if it was necessary to prevent threats.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    War powers between the legislative and the executive branch is an important and complex issue in American national politics because there are multiple interpretations of what constitutes the appropriate relationship between the legislative and the executive branch in regard to war powers. Both Louis Fisher in his book, Presidential War Power and John Yoo in his book, The Power of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11 focus on what is the appropriate sharing of war powers between the legislative and executive branch? Fisher and Yoo are both scholars in this area of study but have different opinions on what constitutes as sharing of war powers between the legislative and the executive branch. This paper will focus on…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought. The theory that was first propounded by St Augustine of Hippo and St Ambrose of Milan ( 4th and 5th centuries AD) attempts to clarify two fundamental questions: ‘when is it right to fight?’ and ‘How should war be fought?’. Whereas Pacifists are people mainly Christians who reject the use of violence and the deliberate killing of civilians but claims that peace is intrinsically good and ought to be upheld either as a duty and that war can never be justifiable. However, Realists agree that, due to the nature of humans, force is a necessary action to be used to maintain a just and ordered society. Therefore, since the Second World War, people have turned their attention to Just War again establishing rules that can serve as guidelines to a just war- the Hague and Geneva conventions.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    War Powers Act of 1973

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As such it can be seen that the President is bound by laws, amendments and continuing resolutions that place too much weight on the conduct of foreign policy complicated by the participation of military aspect (Cockburn, 1999). It is essential that the effect of these laws on foreign policy should be understood.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Just War theory tries to judge whether it is ‘just’ to go to war and how the war should be fought. It tries to reconcile three things; taking a human life is seriously wrong. That states have a duty to defend their citizens and defend justice and thirdly protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The war powers is a unique and is an important part in today's society. Realizing what this power where it came from and how it effects us today. Under the Constitution, the war powers are divided between the President and Congress. The war power resolution was an act that Congress passed in 1973. The war powers resolution is also known as the war powers act.…

    • 2935 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justification. Defined as the act of justifying something. To serve as an acceptable reason or excuse for our actions, based on actual or believed information. Throughout the history of not only the modern world, but certainly back to the "barest essentials of reason" our species have made decisions that have effectively shaped our world into what it is today. Or have not. The judgments made in the past may also have been relatively insignificant to a larger picture, but would still be important in one persons or a group of people's day-to-day life. Either way, choices made in any way, shape, or form, are based on what the decision maker believes to be true or morally right. Timothy Findley displays the abovementioned opinion-based judgments in the novel The Wars. From the background behind the novel, to the ending scene of the main character being burned to the ground in a flaming barn, many choices are made. Whether large and important or small and insignificant, Mr. Findley asks us as readers and as humans to look into ourselves to uncover the reasoning behind the choices, as well as our own actions and the actions of our leaders. The justification for most of the aforementioned incidents in The Wars can be classified under 3 broad-based ideas: safety, self-interest or the moral/general good.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the twin towers fell and condensed to rubble on September 11, 2001, the Bush administration quickly formulated a plan to maintain the nation’s sense of national safety and security. John Lewis Gaddis summarized the administration’s directions to the public when he wrote, “Bush requested, and only partially received, what amounted to a global police action against terrorism, combined with a call for vigilance at home and abroad, combined with the suggestion that, despite what had happened, Americans should carry on with their ordinary lives” (Gaddis at 37). The citizens were to follow the example of former British politician Sir Winston Churchill; Bush believed the nation would best react to the crisis by applying Churchill’s words to their lives- the nation need to “keep calm and carry on” (Gale Biography In Context) while the administration began gathering intelligence and plotting their retaliation. In contrast to average citizens, Bush outlined what was later named The Bush Doctrine which said, “that the United States will identify and eliminate terrorists wherever they are, together with the regimes that sustain them” (Gaddis at 86). This meant the focus of the nation now weighed equally on the defensive and offensive sides of the scale. The Bush Doctrine outlines three core principles: preemption, unilateralism, and hegemony (Gaddis at 16, 22, 16). The United States has historically maintained defense for its people by eliminating or containing possible threats and if a threat becomes a reality, the nation retaliates, as it did following the bombing of Pearl Harbor. After 9/11, the government gained the authority to use surveillance and monitor communication through phones and the internet in order to avoid any other attacks of the same nature. In addition, “The administration also detained more than 600 possible suspects and announced it might use military tribunals to try alleged foreign terrorists” (Masci and Marshall). Despite the numerous…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    9/11 Aftermath

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the speech George W. Bush made, “Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People, Sept. 20, 2001,” he began to try to rationalize and justify his decision to prepare for war by stating, “Tonight we are a country awakened to danger and called to defend freedom. Our grief has turned to anger, and anger to resolution. Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done.” When people start to panic and fear what is going to happen next, they tend to look up to higher authority, such as the government, and George W. Bush saw this happening and…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays