Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Assess the Constraints on the President’s Role as Commander-in-Chief.

Good Essays
538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess the Constraints on the President’s Role as Commander-in-Chief.
Article II of the United States Constitution gives the president the role of ‘Commander-in-Chief’ of the US’s Armed Forces, and this role provides the basis for rapid and effective decision-making, whilst maintaining the credibility of the USA’s foreign policy on the world stage. However, there are certain constraints on the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief’. One constraint on this power is that only Congress has the power to declare war. Congress can also authorise the president to deploy his country’s armed forces. Since the Constitution was created, Congress has only declared war a total of five times (in both World Wars, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, and the Spanish-American War), and this power has not been used since 1941. These authorisations are ordered by the President however, showing just how interlinked the powers of the president and Congress really are. One example of when the timing of a congressional authorisation can be crucial is the vote on action against Iraq, a few months before the 2002 midterm elections. This congressional authorisation was manipulated by George W Bush, and shows that the president can take advantage of this and make a decision with a Congress that has a majority of his party as members, rather than waiting until after a midterm when he might not be so sure as to have a key decision go his way. The relationship between Congress and the president was confirmed by the War Powers Act of 1973, passed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.
This Act reins in the war-making authority of the president by demanding that the executive notify Congress within 48 hours after deploying the armed forces in combat. The presidents after Nixon have generally complied with the requirements of the Act, however they have all argued that the Act infringes on the president’s constitutional duty as Commander-in-Chief. They are well in their right to believe that, but many constitutional scholars maintain that Congress is within its right to exercise oversight in foreign policy matters, reining in the executive where necessary.
There have been several examples in the 20th century that would suggest that there are not enough constraints on the president’s role as Commander-in-Chief. Lyndon B Johnson, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan are three presidents that have stretched the Constitution in their role. In the 1960s, Johnson personally selected targets for bombing missions in North Vietnam; in the 1970s Nixon authorised secret operations in Cambodia and Laos (widely condemned as being beyond his constitutional powers); and in the 1980s Reagan was embroiled in the Iran-Contra scandal after his administration was found to have secretly sold weapons to Iran and channelled the funds to Nicaraguan rebels seeking to overthrow their Communist government. These examples prove that presidents are not completely constrained in their Commander-in-Chief role, even though there are still numerous constitutional checks on the president’s foreign policy powers; foreign treaties require the ratification of two-thirds of the senate, all senior diplomats and senior forces personnel require majority senate ratification, and Congress alone can declare war, though the president does have the capacity, as previously mentioned, to engage troops briefly in minor conflicts.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy 315 Week 3 Quiz

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages

    | The president's ability to bypass the Senate and create foreign policy directly through the use of executive agreements was limited by Congress in 1972 with the passage of thea. Case Act.b. Hatch Act.c. Congressional Budget and Impoundment Act.d. War Powers Act.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the War Powers Resolution, the Commander in Chief can only send American personnel abroad to take military action against another country only with a declaration of war from Congress. However, according to “statutory authority” or in the case of an attack on the United States, the president reserves the right to take action against a sovereign country, given that the president has issued a forty-eight hour notice to Congress, and the personnel remain active for no longer than sixty days. This important resolution severely limits the power of the Commander in Chief, and lays within the system of checks of balances which is vitally integral to the United States government.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman’s involvement with the Korean War is another example of how past presidential practices have not maintained the Constitution’s original intent between the balance of power and limits. In deciding to go to war against North Korea, Truman acted unilaterally and never even sought Congress’s authorization. He did not even seek retroactive approval. Indeed, “President Truman had altered the Constitution by taking the country to war against North Korea without either formal declaration or statutory authorization, relying instead on resolutions passed by the UN Security Council.” In his work, John Yoo persistently quotes that James Madison, “wanted to prevent the president from using his war powers to enhance his overall power and importance…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the 227 years since the creation of the United States Constitution, the U.S. Armed Forces have been involved in over 100 military conflicts, yet Congress has declared war in only five of them; the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Spanish and American wars, World War I and World War II.1 According to Article I Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress shall have the power…”To declare…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The President of the United States is a very important and strong leader that does not have the right to officially go to war without the approval of Congress. This law is dubbed the War Powers Act since it states that the President has to notify Congress when sending troops to hostilities and if in a state of emergency, 42 hours after (SAS Institute Inc). Presidents in the past, like President Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, have argued that by enforcing the War Powers Act, Congress is taking away constitutional authorities that have been exercised for many years. On the other hand, people, such as George Mason, claim that giving the power to declare war to one singular person is a very untrustworthy situation (SAS Institute Inc). This argument…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the beginning, the relationship between the presidency and Congress has been a difficult one. The framers put into place a system of checks and balances to help make sure that there would always be such a struggle. The distinctive “tension between one branch writing laws and budgets and the other branch carrying out the laws and spending the money has been” (Professional Development) an essential characteristic of the American government. Although the Constitution gives Congress, the power to declare war and omit money for troops and weapons, presidents stay given a broad leeway to defend the nation and wage war. Presidents have stretched this power to move without congressional approval through military interventions.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although only Congress has the right to authorise the use of the armed forces, if the president acts there is little Congress can do to restrain him.This is a power given to the President domestically, executing the power on an international scale gives the President a powerful image that asserts his/her dominance. An example would be Franklin Roosevelt. Roosevelt's four terms as president were marked by two of the largest threats to America; the Great Depression and World War II. The role President Roosevelt played during World War II showed complete dominance at an international scale, he can be seen to be one of the most influential Presidents that America has ever had. Franklin D Roosevelt was given the power to be Commander-In-Chief, as all Presidents do and had became an international figure because of…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carter quotes,” In his original veto message, President Nixon asserted that he had no choice but to reject the Resolution because it was "clearly unconstitutional.””. President Nixon has a point in which he says that he shouldn’t even be following the resolution if the constitution already provides enough power through all this. Limiting the the presidents power is not necessary one bit, the position of President wouldn’t be needed or it would just become obsolete if they didn’t have the power to perform whatever they wanted that they believed would help. Even chairman Tom Connaly disagrees,"Do you think I'll have to ask Congress for a declaration of war if I decide to send American forces into Korea?" the President asked?"If a burglar breaks into your house," I said, "you can shoot at him without going down to the police station and getting permission. . . . You have the right to do it as commander-in-chief and under the UN Charter.". [25](fed-soc.org) The point that Conally was trying to bring across is that as a president, the ability to wage in combat should be under their choice, they are the ones voted for to provide for whats best for the citizens either way.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two perspectives on Presidential power are power as persuasion and unilateral power. Since Presidents’ power is to persuade, they have far less formal power than the necessary to meet the large expectations over them. Presidents take to office their goals and expectations for public policy, but to accomplish these, they must work with the Congress. Congress and the presidency were created to avoid one single institution from having control over policymaking. Presidents’ power involves the bargaining that derives from their position, reputation, prestige and reputation (Howell). They make their personal impact on the choices of what should be said or done, how and when.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Power Dbq Essay

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To have the power to go beyond the constitution should be one of the president’s power when dealing with war or rebellion, and to protect the lives of US citizens or keep international peace in foreign countries. The presidents throughout history, when taking the action of going beyond the constitution, has helped the US when the south succeeded and when we wanted to help keep international peace. The President needs to have this power in order to become a better leader to its people and help whoever needs…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over two hundred years ago people were asking how powerful should the president be? Is he too powerful now? Today, in the twenty-first century, political scientist, constituent, and even politicians are asking the same questions. One of the most notable debates over this subject stems from a disagree between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton preferred a larger executive while Jefferson preferred a smaller one. When George Washington declared neutrality during a war between Britain and France, Jefferson did not believe that Washington had the constitutional power to do this. Hamilton decided to respond; he did so by publishing articles under the pseudonym, Pacificus.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Presidency In The 1700s

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some of the powers which were assigned to the president by the constitution are, Military powers, the president is in commander in chief, because they didn’t want the military general to seize the government. Diplomatic powers in which the president…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the effectiveness of Congress and the Supreme Court in checking the powers of the President…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The United States military is one of the most important and celebrated institutions our country has. Opinion surveys have shown that Americans have more confidence in the military than in any other institution. Former rampant hostility toward the armed services during the Vietnam era, as well as periods earlier in American history, has faded. The courageous “can do” military has won the empathy and hearts of our nation far and wide, especially in light of the recent assassination of the professed mastermind behind the 9/11 World Trade Center terrorist attack, Osama Bin Laden. A June 2011 Gallup poll found that 78 percent of Americans have a great deal/quite a lot of confidence in the military, 35 percent have faith in the presidency and only 12 percent have any confidence in Congress (in a December 2010 Gallup survey, Americans ' assessment of Congress had hit a new low, with only 13 percent saying they approved of the way Congress was handling its job. The 83 percent disapproval rating was also the worst Gallup had measured in more than 30 years of tracking congressional job performances). Inasmuch as the U.S. military is highly esteemed, it should be understood that ultimate military authority rests in the civilian chain of command. Civilian-military relation is a concept the framers of the Constitution knew was fundamental to democracy. Therefore, it is important to understand the role of the military in democracy. Consequently, there are dangers to the erosion of civilian control over the military.…

    • 2255 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Powers of Congress

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, the power to declare war is also a very important power. The president is allowed to declare war if there is a sudden attack, for instance like 9/11, but when the congress has the power to declare war it is taking a better poll from the people. It then becomes not one person’s choice but the choice of those that we put into congress as voters. Anytime congress has to make a big decision like whether or not we should go to war definitely proves why we voted for them.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays