Calloric Restriction Paper

Back when I was writing the original critical thinking paper I found that it was super hard to pick a topic to inquire about. I didn’t really know what direction I wanted to go in, and all l I knew was that I wanted to write about something that I could easily relate to. In order to pick the topic I would inquire about, I first looked at the list of idea topics, and then came up with a few of my own ideas. From there, I realized that I either wanted to write my critical thinking paper on Caloric Restriction or concussions in sports. Out of the two, I then decided that I would write my paper on Caloric Restriction because I had more questions about the topic and it seemed like it would be easier and more interesting to write about. In general, I really just wanted to find out more about caloric restriction and if restricting calories was truly beneficial/ healthy or not since I had previously tried restricting the calories in my own diet in order to lose weight. After deciding that I was going to write my critical thinking paper on caloric
Next I would come up with my final judgement on caloric restriction. In order to form my conclusion I thought really long and hard about the different pieces of evidence that I presented, and came to the realization that my evidence against caloric restriction was more extreme and powerful then my evidence supporting caloric restriction. I also took into consideration my own experiences that I had with restricting calories. In combination with my own life experiences and evidence presented in the paper, I made the conclusion that Caloric restriction was indeed beneficial but that the evidence against caloric restriction was strong enough to the point where I believed that it should only be prescribed and done in extreme situations such as major