Preview

Case Study Oncale V

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
638 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study Oncale V
Case Study: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.
Joshua Weisman
Webster University
HRMG 5700 QD F2

In the case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., Joseph Oncale was the victim of repeated harassment, sexual, physical and mental, from at least three members of the work crew, of which two had a supervisory position over him. When Oncale brought his complaints to the supervisors, they took no noticeable actions against the harassers and, after he had experienced enough harassment, Oncale quit his position. When Oncale filed the sexual harassment complaint against Sundowner, the district court, relying on the precedent set by the Fifth Circuit courts, “. . . held that Oncale, a male, had no Title VII cause of action for harassment by male coworkers. The Fifth Circuit affirmed.” (Twomey, 442) In 1998, the case was brought before the Supreme Court of the United States, where that decision was reversed, and same-sex harassment was ruled actionable under Title VII. The Supreme Courts decision concerning sexual harassment does not transform Title VII into a general civility code for workplaces. If anything, it just further defines what sexual harassment can be, allowing workers to feel safer in the work environment. As Justice Scalia addressed this argument during his decision, “The prohibition of harassment on the basis of sex requires neither asexuality or androgyny in the workplace; it forbids only behavior so objectively offensive as to alter the ‘conditions’ of the victims employment. ‘Conduct that is not severe or pervasive enough to create an objectively hostile or abusive work environment-an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive-is beyond Title VII’s purview.’” (Twomey 442-443) When judging whether the conduct in question amounted to any sort of sexual harassment, there is a simple standard that should be applied: would a reasonable person, in the complainant 's position, and taking into



References: Twomey, D. P. (2013). Discrimination Laws: Protected Classes Under Title VII and the Constitution. Labor & Employment Law (Fifteenth Edition ed., pp. 428, 430, 442,443). Mason, OH: South-Western.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. is a sex discrimination case under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. “Title VII specifically forbids any employer to … discriminate with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment in any way that would deprive any individual of employment opportunity due to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” (Twomey, 2013, p. 397). In this case, Oncale claimed that he was being discriminated against in his workplace because of his sex. In reading the case online, Oncale was “was forcibly subjected to sex-related, humiliating actions against him … in the presence of the rest…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This law prohibits employers from discriminating their employees on the basis of religion, race, sex, color, and national origin. Since Mrs. Ledbetter was paid significantly less than her male employees at Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. it is evident that she felt she was a victim of gender discrimination, and thus filed a complaint against Goodyear for violating the Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The facts in the case of Thompson V North American Stainless, LP 562 U.S._ (2011) are fairly straightforward. The petitioner in this case, Eric Thompson, was seemingly fired from his job at North American Stainless (NAS) because his fiancée, Miriam Regalado filed a sexual discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). His suit was filed under Title VII claiming that his dismissal was retaliation for his fiancée’s charge. (Pagnattaro, Cahoy, Magid, Reed, & Shedd, n.d.)…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Justice Scalia J. from Case 12.3 in the book ‘’ Labor and Employment” written by David P. Twomey (2013), “ And there is another requirement that prevents Title VII from expanding into a general civility code…the statute does not reach genuine but innocuous differences in the ways men and women routinely interact with members of the same sex and of the opposite sex” (p. 442). We can not only protect the class of opposite sex and ignore the same sex. We live in the world where we need to accept LBGT and treat them as normal human being. Sexual harassment from same sex or different sex should be…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mgmt 520 Week 5 Assignment

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. Research and support your answer with two appellate level (including Supreme Court) U.S. cases that discuss sexual harassment and Title VII, and pertain to this case. Provide the case…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bsbwor501 Unit 2

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sexual harassment still exists within our workforce today. A quid pro quo occurrence is less likely to happen because of Title VII bring them from behind closed door; however working in a hostile work environment still reigns ramped. Though both sexes are subjected to this treatment, the fairer sex is usually the victim. In this individual project a supervisor on a work visa has been repeatedly sexually harassing 2 female employees. Even though the supervisor’s superior has been alerted of his behavior, it continues for 3 months. Whether the supervisor on work visa is unfamiliar with…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did the Title VII section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (updated in 1991) go far enough and provide adequate protection for the U.S. workforce? For the vast majority of states, the answer is a resounding yes; most states defer to the federal legislation for employment-related discrimination laws. There are, however, a handful of states that have enacted their own versions of Title VII; in doing so, they are effectively saying that no, Title VII does not meet the needs of our state. One state that has enacted its own form of employment discrimination laws is Florida; in 1992, the Florida Legislature passed the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. Section 760.10 specifically addresses many of the same issues covered by Title VII protections. What is the same, and what is different, between the two Acts? This paper will summarize the two sets of laws, describe the similarities, and detail the distinct differences between Title VI, the federal law, and Section 760.10 of the Florida law.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The results of this case provided well-defined accountability for an organizations conduct. The court ruled an employer is responsible for the acts of its supervisors, and employers should be encouraged to prevent harassment. It should also be noted the court ruled that employers can reduce liability exposure by exercising reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any harassing behavior and proving the employee did not take advantage of preventive or corrective opportunities that are afforded (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, forbids “an employer to … discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s … sex.” Civil Rights Act, 1964. In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the court held that “a plaintiff may establish a violation of Title VII by proving that discrimination based on sex has created a hostile or abusive work environment.” Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (US 1986). A hostile work environment is created when the environment at work creates anxiety so severe as to result in an alteration of the terms and conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. The burden to prove such an environment was created rests on the plaintiff. The plaintiff must prove that they belong to a protected class; were subject to unwelcomed harassment; the harassment is based on sex, meaning it is not happening to members of the opposite sex; and the harassment alters the conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. In this case, the court will evaluate whether Black has sufficient evidence to prove her claim of a hostile work environment.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964- Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-166) (CRA) and the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-2) amends several sections of Title VII. In addition, section 102 of the CRA (which is printed elsewhere in this publication) amends the Revised Statutes by adding a new section following section 1977 (42 U.S.C. 1981), to provide for the recovery of compensatory and punitive damages in cases of intentional violations of Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (www.twc.state.tx.us, 2015).…

    • 978 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief Meritor Sav

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After being terminated a female bank employee filed an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. §2000e et seq., claiming that she had been sexually harassed by her male supervisor. The US Supreme Court ruled that if the actions of the supervisor were unwelcome, than the respondent had a claim for sexual harassment on the basis of a hostile work environment, even if the sexual acts were voluntary.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roberts, B. S., & Mann, R. A. (n.d.). Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A Primer. Retrieved July 2013, from http://www3.uakron.edu/lawrev/robert1.html…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eichner, Maxine N. Getting Women Work that Isn 't Women 's Work: Challenging Gender Biases in the Workplace Under Title VII. The Yale Law Journal. New Haven: Jun 1988. vol. 97, iss. 7; pg. 1397 retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com on 8-7-2004…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title III Research Paper

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today 's employment practices were defined by the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The law sanction in the year 1964 bans discrimination in employment based on religion, national origin, race, color, or gender. From the beginning, Title VII has advanced the laws regarding anti-discrimination. The laws are intended to "promote fairness, equality, and opportunity within the workplace" (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2003, p. 5). This paper will reflect on the history and evolution of Title VII and observe its impact in the working environment. This paper will also recognize the people who are protected under the Title VII act. The paper will conclude with reviewing the policies and procedures any business should have implemented to minimize Title VII claims of violations.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII made obvious, deliberate employment discrimination illegal. It enforced a legal theory of disparate treatment. Disparate treatment exists if an employer gives less favorable treatment to employees…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays