To begin with, pro-choice supporters have a different stance on whether an unborn baby is in fact a human. In the article “Should Abortion Be Legal?” it states, “Embryos and fetuses are not independent, self-determining beings, and abortion is the termination of a pregnancy, not a baby. A person's age is calculated from birth date, not conception, and fetuses are not counted in the US Census.” (“Should Abortion Be Legal?,” 2017, para. 8). Contrary to what Catholics believe, those in favour of abortion have the outlook that abortion does not kill a human as they need to further develop. Still dependent on their mother for survival, a fetus is not their own person, rather an embryo in a woman’s womb. With these facts in mind, abortion is not the taking of a human life; therefore, it is not morally wrong. In the eyes of a pro-life activist, one can make the argument that killing an unborn baby is the same as killing a regular human according to God’s teachings. Which can lead them to believe if killing a fetus is acceptable, what is the difference between killing a fully developed person? Furthermore, living in a society where abortion is illegal would ultimately be stripping a woman of their human rights. The article suggests that “The 7-2 decision stated that the Constitution gives ‘a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy,’ and that ‘This right of privacy... is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.’”( “Should Abortion Be Legal?,” 2017, para. 4). Pro-choice supporters believe that not allowing a woman to choose to conceive or not is in violation of her rights and freedom. If a woman cannot choose how she wants to treat her own body, then she is not in control over herself. Catholic Church followers can argue the point that the unborn baby will not even be able
To begin with, pro-choice supporters have a different stance on whether an unborn baby is in fact a human. In the article “Should Abortion Be Legal?” it states, “Embryos and fetuses are not independent, self-determining beings, and abortion is the termination of a pregnancy, not a baby. A person's age is calculated from birth date, not conception, and fetuses are not counted in the US Census.” (“Should Abortion Be Legal?,” 2017, para. 8). Contrary to what Catholics believe, those in favour of abortion have the outlook that abortion does not kill a human as they need to further develop. Still dependent on their mother for survival, a fetus is not their own person, rather an embryo in a woman’s womb. With these facts in mind, abortion is not the taking of a human life; therefore, it is not morally wrong. In the eyes of a pro-life activist, one can make the argument that killing an unborn baby is the same as killing a regular human according to God’s teachings. Which can lead them to believe if killing a fetus is acceptable, what is the difference between killing a fully developed person? Furthermore, living in a society where abortion is illegal would ultimately be stripping a woman of their human rights. The article suggests that “The 7-2 decision stated that the Constitution gives ‘a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy,’ and that ‘This right of privacy... is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.’”( “Should Abortion Be Legal?,” 2017, para. 4). Pro-choice supporters believe that not allowing a woman to choose to conceive or not is in violation of her rights and freedom. If a woman cannot choose how she wants to treat her own body, then she is not in control over herself. Catholic Church followers can argue the point that the unborn baby will not even be able