Preview

Causes of Conflict Between Native Americans and European Americans During the Settlement of the West

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
605 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Causes of Conflict Between Native Americans and European Americans During the Settlement of the West
Disrespect was a major cultural difference. From the beginning of the relationship between Native and European Americans, the European Americans(Europeans) repeatedly dishonored the treaties which they agreed to uphold. Usually, they established the same treaties they betrayed, such as the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851); which eventually led to the tragic massacre of the Cheyenne Indians at Sand Creek.[1] “The Treaty set forth traditional territorial claims of the tribes as between themselves.” [2] Greedy and eager to completely disregard the Treaty of Fort Laramie and head west due to the discovery of gold in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, the Pikes Peak Gold Rush resulted in masses of European Americans emigrating west across Cheyenne and Arapho lands.[1] Suddenly, these lands previously deemed useless to the federal government and rightfully owned by the Natives were subject to the Europeans avarice. This resulted in competition over resources, and unlawful settling in Native territories.[1] Instead of upholding the treaty the Federal Government agreed to just a decade before, which might I add they altered just before it was ratified to 10 years of a $50,000 annuity instead of the originally promised 50 years [2], and enforcing a removal of the intruders, on “Feb. 18, 1861 the signing of the treaty of Fort Wise ceded most of the lands designated to them(the Indians) by the Fort Laramie treaty.”[1] This injustice reduced the size of the reservation to one thirteenth its original size.[1] Furthermore, the original commodities established by the previous Fort Laramie treaty would go unfulfilled.

Some Indians recognized these injustices and disavowed the new treaty, remaining in their bison-rich lands.[1] They were angry and believed the chiefs were tricked into signing away their land and that the cheifs were only representing a portion of the tribe.[1] The Europeans arrogance allowed them to overlook these injustices and take the position that Indians

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both groups experienced violence against their culture, against themselves, and they were also disrespected. They were often thought of as less than the white people, and were not treated kindly or humanely. For example, in 1903, Congress was allowed to “dispose of” the Indian’s land without their permission (Native Americans and the Federal Government). This action was very disrespectful towards the Indians, and it resulted in violence. Another example of this is that some Europeans did not think that the Indians had “souls worthy of redemption”, which means that they viewed themselves as better than the Indians (The Story of Chilocco Indian School). So, they did not think that the Indians were as good, or deserving, as themselves. Also,…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Sioux have staunchly maintained that the treaty ratified by the 1877 Act is void for several reasons, among which are the insufficient number of signatures, the coercive nature of the negotiations, and, most importantly, because the Black Hills were never for sale. Despite creating a Court of Claims to allow non-Indians to sue the federal government, claims by Indians were expressly barred until 1920. The Lakota’s appeal for monetary compensation, filed in 1923 and asserting that the seizure of the Black Hills constituted an illegal taking under the Fifth Amendment, represented the only legal avenue for any redress for the loss of their land, and for decades the Lakota pursued the claim despite the inadequacy of any monetary award (Lenane,…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only did the Europeans come to rule the land and perhaps take over Indians; but they never wanted to compromise with the Indians which made it extremely hard for either of the cultures to truly see eye-to-eye. To me, the Indians seemed as if they were willing to work out some negotiations even if it was “unjust” to their culture. However, the Europeans showed no signs of compromise with the Indians. The Europeans were immigrants to the land yet wanted all their rulings to control the land. It would be very hard for me to picture the two getting along for quite a while.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the time period of 1800-1850 white Americans expanded across the vast lands on the western side of the continent and regularly encountered conflict with various Indian nations. In these documents, interactions for the various Indian nations were subjected to different cultivation between each tribe per say that there were responses that filled different needs and demands. Some tribes provided benefits such as agriculture and household manufacture and produced the idea that settlements to be blended and conform into one people. Other interactions created conflict because some of our land purchases were not 100% in compliance with the constitution. Yet some Indian nations were highly influenced by leaders such as Tecumseh for which they understood his implied meanings with obedience and respect. These primary sources of information give a great insight to the goals of the whites and their encounters…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although the new treaty didn’t give Indian’s back all of their land it was supposed to create peace between them and the American’s. Sadly, not everyone must have been…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John L. O’Sullivan had said, “‘... our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.’” (www.britanica.com) During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the untamed West - which, inconveniently, happened to be the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in the Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Colonies moved westwards in order to settle more land, cutting trees down and clearing land for grazing animalsInitiated Anglo-Indian WarsSouthern colonies constantly engaging Indians on frontierPequot War (1634–1638) - armed conflict between the Pequot tribe and Massachusetts Bay and Plymouth coloniesMetacom’s War (King William’s War) (1675–1678)-armed conflict between Native American inhabitants of present-day New England and English colonistsMost colonists took advantage of Native Americans and established an unfair trade system…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971 the Cherokee tribe was in the process of making treaties with United States. The state of Georgia recognized the Cherokee tribe as a nation allowing them to make their own laws and follow their native customs. In the late 1700’s their land started to be invaded by the white man. The Cherokee Indians began to move to Arkansas. (Historical Context) I believe the Indians were taken advantage of and had no option but to move when their land was taken away from them. Georgia and the United States had no regard for the treaties that were put in place. The treaties changed depending on who was in office at the time, the Indians had no choice but to move and give up their land. United States v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall, stated “the Cherokee nation was a domestic independent nation, and therefore Georgia state law applied to them.” When Georgia continued to press the tribe for their land the “Treaty Party” began to make treaties with the federal government to give up their land. The majority of the tribe disagreed with the New Echota treaty where their land was sold for $5 million dollars and the tribe had to move beyond the Mississippi River. Due to corrupt government and the demands of President Andrew Jackson and President Martin Van Buren in 1838, the Indians were “rounded up” and forced off their land and moved to other states.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chief Black Kettle

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After 1850, Cheyenne – Us relations were conducted under the treaty of Fort Laramie. But the US government was unwilling to control the white expansion into his great plains especially after Pikes Peak Gold Rush began in 1859. European Americans displaced the Cheyenne from their lands in violation of the treaty, and consumed important resources of water and game. Increasing competition lead to armed conflict between the groups.…

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Native American relations. Early colonial-Indian relations were an uneasy mix of cooperation and conflict. On the other were a long series of difficult, skirmishes and wars, which almost invariably resulted in an Indian defeat and further loss of land. Although Native Americans benefitted from access to new technology and trade, the disease and thirst for land which the early settlers also brought posed a serious challenge to the Indian's long-established way of life. Those Indians who traded initially had significant advantage over rivals who did not. Some friendly natives were no longer…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ojibwa Vs Lakota

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    First of all, the treaties were mostly fueled by the United States desire for westward expansion, land, and money. In the Ojibwa’s case, the United States was looking to capitalize on the area’s pine and copper and in the Lakota case, they were looking for gold, and area for miners and settlers to live. Along with this, in both cases, the United States came in and separated tribes that were feuding. For the Ojibwa, the establishment of Fort Snelling and the Crawford meeting were attempts by the United States to stop the feuding between the Ojibwa and the Dakota. The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1871 separated the four tribes in the Plains – the Lakota, the Crow, the Cheyenne, and the Arapahoe – from fighting by putting them on separate reservations. In both tribe’s treaty making process, the Americans clearly had the upper hand. They had more resources, land, men, and power. They used this to their advantage and the Indians knew it. In many cases they felt pressured to sign treaties. For example Henry Dodge pressured the Ojibwa chief Flat Mouth to hurry up and sign the treaty even though Chief Buffalo had not arrived yet. In the Lakota case, they did not really want to sign the treaties but the power of the United States frightened them and they knew that if they did not sign the treaties, that the United States would do what they want anyways. That is why…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FRQ- Native Americans

    • 1176 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The presence of a frontier changed western civilization for centuries after Columbus’ landing in the New World. One key aspect of the frontier was the American Indians, and their relationship with the English Colonists. Although the relationship was peaceful at first, it ultimately became a violent one with constant wars and disagreements. This is mainly caused by European expansion and ignorance towards Native customs. In the early 17th century, when English colonists came to the New World in search for a better life, they made peaceful relations with American Indians. Not long after the Colonists and Natives realized their intolerance of each other and the two groups soon became enemies.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The last reason is that when they signed the treaty and agree to move they also receive things. First the tribe gets five million dollars. Who would not want five million dollars. Next they receive 70,000 square miles of Louisiana. The new land that they received might be larger than where the Cherokees were in the first place. But the Cherokees are a tribe so all they need is the land and not the moneys because they are not citizens. Also they may not want to move to another land because where they are in the first place is where their ancestors and others passed away or died so they would not want to move away from their ancestors.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Road To Revolution

    • 1241 Words
    • 12 Pages

    ROAD TO REVOLUTION CHART AND RANKING SYSTEM Danyelle Harris Raevin Frank Jeremy Deng British Action Navigation Law 1650s - Tried to enforce strict trade codes. RATIONALE Colonial Reaction The colonists were there Smuggling to make money for the “mother” country. (Britain) RATIONALE They wanted to make themselves more money$$ Was created to reduce Continue to smuggle They felt as though their smuggling of goods in anyways and violating rights were being taken the colonies by searching the writ.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The removal of American Indian tribes from lands east of the Mississippi River to what is now the state of Oklahoma is one of the tragic episodes in American history. Early treaties signed by American agents and representatives of Indian tribes guaranteed peace and the integrity of Indian territories, primarily to assure that the lucrative fur trade would continue without interruption. American settlers' hunger for Indian land, however, led to violent conflict in many cases, and succeeding treaties generally compelled tribes to cede large areas to the United States government.…

    • 4491 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays