Preview

Citizenship In The Early Republic Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
605 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Citizenship In The Early Republic Essay
The Beginning of Citizenship in the early Republic
When the collapse of the monarchy and the creation of the Republic had taken place, it is when the control of Roman government was allowed to only a small groups of influential families called the patricians. The remaining residents were the plebeians. Slowly giving way to a commonwealth (res publica), a state governed by the people. The agricultural population of ancient Rome consisted of a dominant class of large landowners, the patricians, and other class of farmers and small landowners called plebeians.The plebians began not to like being second-class and started demanding to join into the affairs of their state and have their voices heard as citizens of Rome. The Conflict of the Orders also looked like the “Struggle of the
…show more content…
“This new concept of citizenship, however, did not mean full equality. The differences between patrician and plebian still existed. In 450 BCE the creation of the Twelve Tables, the first Roman law code, established rules that governed, among other things, the relationship between the two classes. The reward of citizenship only meant that an individual lived under the “rule of law” and had a vested interest in his government. One must wonder why there was this desire to vote or, in other words, to be a true Roman citizen” (Fiero, 2017). Even Roman slave lived in a different society; they could earn or buy their freedom or liberty and enjoy the benefits of citizenship, gaining wealth and power; his children could even hold public office one day. “With the growth of Rome and its desire to extend its boundaries beyond the city walls, the concept of Roman citizenship changed. This growth begged the question: how were these newly conquered people to be treated? Were they to become Roman citizens? Were they to be considered equals? Despite the fact that Rome had always been a city of immigrants, the acquisition of citizenship for a resident

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although government tried efforts to taper off the food subsidiaries during 1960s, in order to cover the poor growing year and admit the agreement with the Soviet Union to sell millions of grain to them, the first term of Nixon administration, with no alternative, develop a suit of programs to increase the production, according to Scott’s word. Workings too hard always make the opposite results, in the end, the basic commodities such as wheat, corn, soybeans and cotton was a surplus and the price of these dropping in the market. Due to the low price of these by-products such as HFCS, Hydrogenated fats, and corn-fed meats, and the cheapest method to let foods taste yummy is to add fat and sugar. Until 1996, mentioned by Scott, the Freedom to Farm of nutrition implementation applied, the relationship between…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Roman citizenship rights did non-Roman Italians not have? How did this situation change after 88 B.C.? Why did it change?…

    • 4160 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edmund S. Morgan's "The Birth of the Republic" is an excellent overview of the major points of the history of America throughout the revolutionary period.…

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Conflict of Orders- Patricians vs. Plebeians became a fight between the rich wealthy class and the majority peasant class |…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were supposed to pay taxes and fight in battles. Which I think is wrong because nobody should be forced into battle. Plebs were also not allowed to vote in decision over wars and peace. They called the patrician the privileged class in Rome. They were the rich and had everything the plebs didn't. Plebes struggle with equal rights but soon got them.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To obtain political rights, the common people (Plebeians) formed their own assembly, the Concillum Plebus and named their leaders tribunes.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Constitution: A Minority Document,” Charles A. Beard argues that the Constitution was written by a small group of Americans with specific economic and political interests. According to Beard, the Constitution therefore reflects these interests, which were not necessarily the same as those of the general population.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sheer size of the Roman Empire in comparison to Athens greatly depended on Roman connection to the surrounding lands. As said in Document C, rather than forcing all of the people on conquered lands into slavery, the Roman system gave out citizenship in limited amounts. For example, the Foederati, people who lived in city-states with alliances to Rome, were given limited rights in exchange for military service. Latini, people from regions outside of Rome but still on the Italian peninsula, were granted citizenship as well as the right to travel and do business. These people could not, however, have an official Roman marriage. Foreigners from conquered lands such as the Peregrini from India could be given partial or full citizenship.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along w period of political democracy was the 2nd party system, 1st was Federalists and Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans, the new were the Whigs and the Jacksonian Democrats 1830’s, foundation for modern day democrats…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Rome, patricians were known to be the ruling class of the society, while plebians were the peasants or commoners without opportunities to move upward on the social ladder. The lack of social mobility in Ancient Rome poses a comparison against modern time United States. One of the very core foundations of the U.S. is that citizens are encouraged to pursue the American dream. People still hold true the promise of the better life by achieving education attainment…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the U.S. government was frail under the Articles of Confederation there was a debate on whether to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Those who supported the ratification were the Federalists, and those who opposed were known as the Anti- Federalists. Federalists believed in the idea of a strong central government while on the other hand Anti- federalists wanted their own states to have the right to set their own laws.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Birth of the Republic

    • 1232 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the Seven Year War against France, England encountered many expenses which lead to the nation falling into a great debt. This debt created many issues between the British government and its people. England's people felt as if the King was trying to rule over them and not take their own personal beliefs into consideration. The government tried to resolve the issues of their debt by creating new acts that would hopefully pay for the war expenses, the new territory of Canada and Mississippi, and its troops to defend as well as take care of their new land.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution Party is a right wing nationalist political party that beleives that the United States is a Chrisitan Nation founded on the basis of the Bible. The party was founded as the "US Taxpayers' Party" by Howard Phillips, who believed his party was drifting too far to the left side of the political spectrum. The party's name was changed to the Consituion Party in 1999. The party's platform is based on the party's understanding of the original intent of the nation's founding documents.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frederick Nietzsche once wrote that the “untruth, [or lie], is a condition of life.”At least in terms of creating a stable society, Socrates would seem to agree. In The Republic, Socrates points out that civilization is most prone to instability when founded on what he calls a“noble lie.”The lie which, despite its falsehood, serves for the good of society. His noble lie can be broken into two parts: a justification on why the lie applies to all of a society's members and a justification of the role each person serves in their society. Thus, if subjects believe in his noble lie, instability is abated because those who end up in the working class will be given simple reasoning for why they are where they are in society. That is to say, discontent will be diminished because the noble lie gives reasoning for why those in power are in power. The lie is noble in its attempt to achieve a greater good; however, the lie also contains truth due to the fact that, theoretically, it enables those who should be in power to be in power. The concept of the noble lie can be further expanded as its premise, a societal truth founded on a falsehood, can be applied to many different aspects of society. For instance, many people in the U.S. believe that America is a completely democratic country because that is the noble lie they are told, yet many aspects of American society, such as the disenfranchisement of felons, suggest just the opposite.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays