Preview

Clausewitz and Strategic Studies

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2646 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clausewitz and Strategic Studies
Strategic Studies Essay
“Choose a pre-20th century military strategist and show how/why their ideas remain relevant in the 21st century.”

Major General Carl von Clausewitz was a staff officer in the Prussian Army in the early parts of 19th century, suffering defeat in 1806, but leading Prussia back to glory in 1815. However, he was better known as a military theorist, and today is recognised as an integral figure in the evolution of military strategy, for many of his ideas are still prominent and embedded in the modern day strategies used today.

Clausewitz is renowned for his famous work On War (Vom Kriege), in which he records his observation in analytical form, shaped by military and political considerations. His writings come from 39 years of military experience and contains many ideas, although some unfinished, but nevertheless still relevant to today‟s warfare. The big reason why his ideas are some relevant even in modern day is that he has grasped the principle of war; and although the character of war may change from such factors as era, location, culture and political objective of the war, they always follow the principle, and Clausewitz has recognised this in his writing. This essay will introduce the most important Clausewitz theories, which includes the ideas the nature of war according to Clausewitz, the three determining factors towards successful strategy, fog and friction of war and centre of gravity. These ideas were raised in the Clausewitzian era; however, the ideas are still very much relevant in the 21 st century.

One of Clausewitz‟s most important ideas is the nature of war; it involves fighting in a contest, it can be seen as a social activity and is used as an instrument of policy. He quoted that war is

-2“a true political instrument, a continuation of political activity by other means”1 . It opposes the popular thought that war is simply a consequence of failed politics, a final option to a break down of diplomacy between nation states.



References: Bernard Brodie, „The Continuing Relevance of Clausewitz‟, in Carl von Clausewitz, On War, edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1976, pp.45–58. Colin Gray, Clausewitz, History, and the Future Strategic World, Prepared for the Strategic and Combat Studies Institute Conference – „Past Futures‟, Royal Military Academy, Sandhurst, 3-4 July, 2003, pp.1-24. (www.army.mod.uk/img/doctrine/scsi47.pdf). Michael Howard, „The Continuing Relevance of Clausewitz‟, in Carl von Clausewitz, On War, edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1976, pp.27-44. Hugh Smith, „Clausewitz: Apostle of Modern War (Chapter 2)‟ in Hugh Smith (ed)., The Strategists, Australian Defence Studies Centre, Canberra, 2001, pp. 1-14. Hans Rothfels, „Clausewitz‟, in The Makers of Modern Strategy edited by Edward Mead Earle, Gordon A. Craig & Felix Gilbert, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1943, pp. 93-113.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    TITLE MAJ Evette Barnes, SG6A, AY 2017-18 November 2017, H100 Question: How does Clausewitz's paradoxical trinity explain the changes to the character of warfare from the methods used by Frederick the Great to those that followed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? Carl von Clausewitz defines the nature of war by identifying that which remains constant in all wars using his highly regarded paradoxical trinity ; meanwhile, he acknowledges war has, and will continue to change as the characteristics of warfare change but that the three aspects of the trinity (simplified as government, army, and people ) are constantly at play. It is the variables within the compelling relationships between: instruments…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way in which Clausewitz and Jomini essentially maintain the same principles of war but only differ in what they consider significant such as the idea of movements of armies, the significance of politics and total war principles. Jomini throughout his art of war has shown the importance of planning and strategic movement yet Clausewitz recognizes the significance of other factors of war that are hard to quantify, such as the fog of war, the politics involved in war and the need to be barbarous in…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    General George S. Patton referred to by many historians as the “Forgotten General” didn’t see much action in almost the entirety of his military career. In fact he did not have the opportunity to show his genius in military warfare until World War II. It wasn’t until the end of 1942 thru 1945 that General Patton had finally proved to the world the genius he was in tactical warfare, and many compared him to Hitler because of his talk of never giving up an inch of land, his contempt for civilian authority, and his joy at killing. Patton’s love of war, coupled with his seemingly coldhearted approach to battle, still makes his critics uncomfortable. Despite the…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history, military leaders have immortalized their legacies by vanquishing their enemies in the battlefield against overwhelming odds. Soldiers and historians have revered their accomplishments by studying their mastery in the art of warfare with the hopes mimicking their accomplishments. Of them all, Napoleon Bonaparte is considered the best military leader in the history of the Western World and has been the most influential with the development of modern day Western armies. According to Knox, “military revolutions are changes in the nature and purpose of war itself.”1 Napoleon's military tactics and strategy have revolutionized European warfare during the 1800s. His use of nationalism, military organizational structure, and combined arms were key factors that helped his juggernaut army conquer most of Europe. The French system led the way for Europe's military modernization and is modeled by the modern day U.S. Army whose military victories and failures have strong familiarities.…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first chapter is about how important tactical decisions can win a country and a war. With…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clausewitz understood that “so-called mathematical factors never find a firm basis in military calculations. From the very start there is an interplay of possibilities, probabilities, good luck and bad that weaves its way throughout the length of the tapestry,” meaning nothing in war is ever certain and, therefore, one’s strategy can never be certain. Likewise, Sun Tzu acknowledged, “in war there may be one hundred changes in each step.” The strategy involved in winning a war must change constantly because one must manage the variables in one’s own strategy and, simultaneously, one must attempt to affect the enemy’s strategy. According to Sun Tzu, war is non-rational because you are in constant exchange with an enemy, “as water shapes its flow in accordance with the ground, so an army manages its victory in accordance with the situation of the enemy. And as water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions.” Clausewitz als believed war is non-rational because of human nature, “in a world dominated so much by chance- courage, daring, boldness, and trust in one’s luck are essential qualities for a great commander.” These two ideals go hand-in-hand with one another. When fighting a war, one must constantly react to the enemy’s efforts, which are unpredictable because the enemy is human and reacting to one’s own decisions. This continual interchange creates a non-rational environment full…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While attending National War College (NWC), Powell grew, learned and thought with more sophistication then his peers.7 He welcomed the ideas of his professors and other dignitaries he met while attending NWC. Powell absorbed key material he thought was the most valuable in enhancing his strategic leadership abilities for tackling the challenges he might face. In particular, he embraced Clausewitz with arms wide open and internalized the three pillars of the triad, concluding that “Without the three legs engaged, the military, the government, and the people, the enterprise cannot stand.”8 His exceptional knowledge of Clausewitz gave him insight regarding Vietnam and lead him to adopt a strategic model of “military action and policy are key…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    combat high

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the essay “Combat High”, written by Sebastian Junger, shows how war can be both rewarding and exciting, but also how the war can be very costly at the same time. Many people look down upon war, but Junger does a very good job showing both the pros and cons about war.…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The research paper enclosed is one that focuses on a great military leader, Douglas MacArthur. This leader was a household name in the United States during World War I, World War II, the Cold War and the Korean War. His name was synonymous with “Power” and “influence,” during the 40’s. He became known for his great strategic battles that ultimately won World War II for the United States and its allies. However, MacArthur became just as popular for his sometimes off the wall theories and beliefs on political topics.…

    • 2264 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    German sociologist Max Weber wrote of the Great War, “this war, with all its ghastliness, is nevertheless grand and wonderful. It is worth experiencing” (EP 768). Embellishing the heroism of warfare, Weber reflects a common acceptance of war in the early twentieth century as one of sport and necessity. However, with the development of nuclear arms came a paradigm shift concerning war and its role amid international powers. Acknowledging the destructive potential of nuclear warfare, Kennedy adamantly stated, “We were not going to misjudge or challenge the other side needlessly, or precipitously push our adversaries into a course of action that was not intended” (75). Using historical precedent as his guide, President Kennedy acts upon the belief that war is rarely intentional, while also recognizing the evolving dynamic of war as one of an arms struggle.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rommel vs Patton

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I have decided to write my paper over two of the greatest generals of World War II: Erwin Rommal and George S. Patton. These two men are the most well known generals of World War II and for a reason. They both are nearly identical in the way they fought their fought their opponents…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is important that military officers in today’s Army study military history. Studying military history will not provide the military officers with an exact template on how to conduct warfare; however, it does offer opportunities to explore the thought processes and the decisions of commanders faced with difficult circumstances. When a leader is confronted with insecurity, it is important to be capable of creative thought and…

    • 1140 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What essentially is needed is and up to date definition which characterize diplomacy as it is, a many dimensional form of political action, and thereby draw a sharp focus both on its limitations and its potential. In this way, with and acute understanding, diplomacy can be utilised to effectively as a medium to potential military conflicts between nations, namely war.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics