Importance of the Military History in the Military Decision Making Process
Dennisse M. Vázquez Casiano
Inter-American University of Puerto Rico
San German
Importance of the Military History in the Military Decision Making Process
Since we were children, history has been inculcated to us. Actually, history has been something that every single human being has hated at least once in their life time. However, while we were growing up we started noticing that history is a little bit more than just a course that students need to approve in order to graduate from school. While time was passing by, history classes became more and more important in every, or at least, most individuals. As we know, history is nothing else than the past, and history as at all is really important because is us, we are the past and the present, so we are history. This fact is not only true for the individual, but it is indeed for large societies as well, and of course, for the United States. An important fact about the history of the United States is that it would not have become what it is right now if it would not have been because of what we know as the military. As future officers that we are about to become, is really important to know the history of the military. The question here is why? Why is the military history so important for us? Well, this paper will let us know the relevance of studying military history for the modern military professional and into the officer’s decision making process. It is important that military officers in today’s Army study military history. Studying military history will not provide the military officers with an exact template on how to conduct warfare; however, it does offer opportunities to explore the thought processes and the decisions of commanders faced with difficult circumstances. When a leader is confronted with insecurity, it is important to be capable of creative thought and originality to defeat the enemy. You cannot begin to know about yourself, to understand the present, the way we live and why, until you understand something of your roots in the past. And that is the first fact about the importance of the military history. The only way we can understand who we are and how we got to be that way is by studying the past, similarly, the only way we can understand others is by studying their past. Studying the military history helps leaders to understand their responsibilities. In particular they will appreciate the importance of discipline and the need to build confident and cohesive teams. In addition to that, studying those past decisions that our ancestors made is a great way to make accurate decisions today. Making decisions is an important aspect of being an officer, being knowledgeable about the past or the history is a great way to make the right decision today.
Decision making is knowing when, why and what to decide and understand the consequences of those decisions. In the military, making decisions is a crucial fact in order to be successful and make things happen; that is why we have the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP). The MDMP is a tool used by military personnel, especially officers to make accurate and right decisions. The important aspect about the MDMP is that it is the origin of operations. In order to develop and execute any plan or operation, leaders in the military must understand where and how to integrate and apply the MDMP in changing situations. As we saw in chapters one and two of the military history book, the history of the United States lies mostly in the decisions made by those who were involved in the military development since the beginning of the US military history. Important examples of officers in the military history are Robert E. Lee, Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson and Abraham Lincoln, characterized history individuals that made important decisions throughout the military history. Robert E. Lee is perhaps the most ironic and most widely respected of all Civil War commanders. When he decided to surrender the Army of Northern Virginia at Appomattox Court House on April 9, 1865, it meant the Civil War was virtually over. Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson is known as the one that carried out a left flanking attack at Chancellorsville which was a major battle of the American Civil War. Meanwhile, Abraham Lincoln halfway through the American Civil War, while fighting to end slavery, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 to declare that all slaves in the Confederate States would be free. This was one of the most important decisions ever made in the United States History and was this decision the one that made the Civil War end.
With those examples we can definitely say that making the right decision in the right moment is something more important that we can imagine. It is in officer’s hands to use history as a resource to provide a context that helps prepare an agile mind to make informed decisions. Studying past battles such as the Civil War and events such as The Military Revolution and World Conflicts can help leaders to understand their responsibilities. In this case, the Civil War is considered one of the most important events in the history of the United States. The war was important because it, for one, finally resolved what had been the great discrepancy in the American ideal: that a nation dedicated to the idea that “all men are created equal”. The Civil War redefined not only what it meant to be an American, but what it was that America itself meant to be and this is an example of the importance of the military history in the decision making process, because everything in life including the military is a matter of choice and making the right or wrong decision.
To sum up, we can confidently say that the primary purpose and the most important part of studying military history for the officers and leaders of the United States military is to learn about leadership, command, logistics, and why some leaders throughout the history have succeeded while others failed. As future leaders we should be more perceptive and seek to learn why individuals in the military history like Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson, Robert E. Lee and Abraham Lincoln did what they did, and why they succeeded. History is made by us, and in the case of military history, the history is made by individuals like us that were under a huge amount of pressure and in circumstances hard to deal with.
References
The Civil War. (2013, March 12). In Shmoop University. Retrieved from http://www.shmoop.com/civil-war/ The Civil War. (2013, December 1). In Weider History Network. Retrieved from http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-generals
References: The Civil War. (2013, March 12). In Shmoop University. Retrieved from http://www.shmoop.com/civil-war/ The Civil War. (2013, December 1). In Weider History Network. Retrieved from http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-generals
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
With the influence of battles such as Vera Cruz, Hampton Roads, and Manila Bay, the military has been able to develop into an unstoppable force. The lessons of Army-Navy cooperation, amphibious operation, technological advancement, and military readiness have resulted in America’s rise to world prominence since the nineteenth century as the nation has grown overtime. This in turn has spread America’s influence throughout the world. No nation can match the might of the United States, because the military has developed overtime into a dominant force which is dedicated to America’s status as a world…
- 1698 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The two authors of this book were Allan R. Millett and Peter Maslowski. Maslowski, the author of chapters one through nine, is a professor of U.S. Military History and U.S. History at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He earned his Ph. D at Ohio State University and has served on the Army Historical Advisory Committee, the Executive Board of War In History, and the Board of Trustees of the Society for Military History. He holds three prestigious awards for outstanding teaching. Millett , the author of chapters ten through eighteen, is a Professor of Military History at Ohio State University. He also earned his Ph. D at Ohio State. A U.S. Marine Corps officer,…
- 754 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
John Lynn in his article “The Evolution of Army Styles in the Modern West” gives an alternative view to conceptualizing the evolution of the armies in the west. Lynn argues that it is institutional factors that are of great importance in understanding the evolution of militaries in the west. Although Lynn does not reject the technological and tactical components in the process of the creation of modern militaries, he does not view these factors as a driving evolutionary force. The author sees the evolution of western militaries as a continuum that is shaped by what Lynn refers to as “paradigmatic states”.…
- 1555 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
e. As the Army assesses itself as Profession of Arms, there are major strengths that have sustained the profession as well as tensions within its professional culture and ethic. After nine years of war we need a thorough assessment across all the key attributes of…
- 314 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In bygone days, commanders were taught that when in doubt, they should march their troops towards the sound of gunfire. I intend to march my troops towards the sound of gunfire.[->0]”…
- 5242 Words
- 21 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Cited: Cowley, Robert, and Geoffrey Parker. Reader 's Companion to Military History. Wilmington: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2001.…
- 1051 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…
- 1853 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“This publication was the fourth of a series on the Army's Professional Military Ethics (PME) that the Army Chief of Staff, General George Casey, started in 2009. General Casey encouraged the Army to think critically about our PME and promote dialog at all levels as we deepen our understanding of what this time-honored source of strength means to the profession today. In his book, Pfaff (2011) explores the cultural values, challenges the Army faces, in a time of persistent irregular conflicts. Pfaff argues that the challenges come from the nature of the conflict. The guerrilla soldiers change the nature of war from forcing your will on your enemy to convincing the enemy to accept your position.” (Pfaff,…
- 1012 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
From the Minutemen of the Revolutionary War to today's high-tech weapons, the American Military has changed and morphed to meet the needs of the times. Our military has evolved massively since the days of our Forefathers and is still growing every day. There are three key events where the American Military was improved and/or evolved setting a path for a more organized, trained, well-equipped, and respected Military. The events that will be discussed regarding the American Military was the Civil War, Mahan’s lectures, and the development of American Air Force. All of which greatly impacted the efficiency and success of the military and gave the United States great foundation for developing and advancing.…
- 1665 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…
- 697 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Initially, both the Yankees and the Rebels approached the task of acquiring intelligence in their own way. During this…
- 5565 Words
- 23 Pages
Powerful Essays -
3. Gabriel, Richard A. & Metz, Karen S. “A Short History of War: The Evolution of Warfare and Weapons.” Professional Readings in Military Strategy, No. 5. (1992). Web. 2 March. 2013…
- 1961 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The focal point of my paper will be on the changes in the United States (US) armed forces over the last century. I chose to compare the Buffalo Soldiers, who existed from 1867-1896, and their experiences with the current state of the US armed forces. I was drawn to author, ZZ Packer’s “Buffalo Soldiers” because of my experience in the US armed services and, as I read the book it became clear that the US armed services today is very different from what it was at the time when the Buffalo Soldiers existed. I served honorably in both the United States Air Force and United States Army from 1985-2001, and my experiences are in stark contrast to the experiences of the Buffalo Soldiers.…
- 1076 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Bibliography: • Harlan, L.R. (1974 – source). History Matters. [on-line]. Available from: http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/39 [accessed 16 Aug. 2010]…
- 2613 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
As Ronald Reagan came into office, he was considered apprehensive of the Soviet Union. Throughout his presidency, he remained centered on the perceived threat to the safety and security of the United States from the Soviet Union and its Communist system. President Reagan rejected how most leaders in Washington perceived the cold war and how it should be handled. First of all, he viewed communism as something that needed to vanish completely because of its inhumane treatment that border-lined insanity. The current plan was to try to “coexist” with the Soviet threat, but Reagan felt that the threat should be conquered. Secondly, Reagan believed that the United States needed unquestionable military strength. He excluded the ideas of having weapons treaties with the Soviets. In his opinion, peace was only attainable by making America stronger than its enemies. Lastly, Reagan went against traditional thinking with the Strategic Defense Initiative. He knew that the only defense against a nuclear attack from the Soviets was to make that attack useless (Dunn 21). Through all of this, one of the effects became the Reagan Doctrine.…
- 1078 Words
- 5 Pages
Best Essays