Conflict Management Plan Paper
University of Phoenix Material
Conflict Management Plan
1. Identify the available conflict management strategies and their strengths and weaknesses.
Strategy | Strengths | Weaknesses | Compromising Strategy | My offer the last option due to other options have exhausted or failed. Lets other members consider others as well as developing sympathy. | Reduces the goal of all members involved. This results in the force of decisions as well as may not be long term due to risk of reoccurring of conflicts. | Team building Strategy | Is a long lasting association and it creates a win/win situation. Creation as well as interventions create a “we feeling” among people and sets extreme optimistic mindset by building proper company traditions. | …show more content…
Interacting directly and removing the misunderstanding may help James and David to speak to each other and would set agendas for future plans of action. With long term, they would decide their plan of action to ensure their individual objectives that are totally integrated with the company’s objectives. With collaborating in the collaborative strategy with each other would ensure that there is more understanding developing between James and …show more content…
In this scenario, either or both James and David would attempt to confirm that one of them are wrong. I would think that the main strategy would be to persuade James about his actions not being planned and that he actually should be ready to compromise or help David. I think that they should also be persuaded that these actions are minor problems and should apologize to each other just in case of either of them feeling that they have been hurt sentimentally. The thing is, is that sorry is not going to decrease stature between the two, but, however, would make the company much more stronger due to conflict is apart and the parcels of existence that the group members must come out when these kinds of situations
Conflict Management Plan
1. Identify the available conflict management strategies and their strengths and weaknesses.
Strategy | Strengths | Weaknesses | Compromising Strategy | My offer the last option due to other options have exhausted or failed. Lets other members consider others as well as developing sympathy. | Reduces the goal of all members involved. This results in the force of decisions as well as may not be long term due to risk of reoccurring of conflicts. | Team building Strategy | Is a long lasting association and it creates a win/win situation. Creation as well as interventions create a “we feeling” among people and sets extreme optimistic mindset by building proper company traditions. | …show more content…
Interacting directly and removing the misunderstanding may help James and David to speak to each other and would set agendas for future plans of action. With long term, they would decide their plan of action to ensure their individual objectives that are totally integrated with the company’s objectives. With collaborating in the collaborative strategy with each other would ensure that there is more understanding developing between James and …show more content…
In this scenario, either or both James and David would attempt to confirm that one of them are wrong. I would think that the main strategy would be to persuade James about his actions not being planned and that he actually should be ready to compromise or help David. I think that they should also be persuaded that these actions are minor problems and should apologize to each other just in case of either of them feeling that they have been hurt sentimentally. The thing is, is that sorry is not going to decrease stature between the two, but, however, would make the company much more stronger due to conflict is apart and the parcels of existence that the group members must come out when these kinds of situations