This is not like the classical and neoclassical or the positivist theories, which does assume that a society is only characterized primarily on the consensus, the conflict theory that is between competing interest groups ("for example, the rich, against the poor, corporations against labor, Whites against minorities, men against women, adults against children, Protestants against Catholics, Democrats against Republicans"). There are in many cases, that the competing interest groups that are not equal in power or even resources, and that there is consequently one group that is dominant while the other is a subordinate.
Although it has not been addressed "crime per se", the conflict criminology and it is based on the seminal ideas that are from the German sociologists Max Weber (1864-1920) and Georg Simmel (1858-1918), who has ideas that are "liberal" about the social conflict, and in a large part, we are the reaction to more radical ideas of yet another German social …show more content…
While on one hand, the dominant groups could cede some of the power that the subordinate groups, could be making the latter of the groups more powerful and the reducing of the conflict. While on the other hand, the dominant group members can become more effective rulers and subordinate group members better subjects. Conflict theory has also been criticized by many psychologists for ignoring the individual differences that are among criminal offenders. The critics have charged that the conflict theorists have ignored the variation in how the people have responded to the relative powerlessness and the conflict that have often the results. Since the conflict theorists have failed to explain why the criminal offenders have chosen the particular crimes to commit. Ignored in the conflict theory are such important factors as the opportunity, intelligence, and the skills that are necessary to commit the various of