Preview

Contingency Theory of Leadership

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
612 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Contingency Theory of Leadership
Contingency Theory of Leadership

The most popular and extensively researched situational theory of leadership was first proposed by Fred Piedler during the 1960s. Fiedler's model claims that group performance depends on the interaction of the leader style and the favorableness of the situation. Fiedlers major contributions consist of(l) iden-tifying the leadership orientation of the leader and developing a way to measure it, and (2) identifying three situational factors influencing leadership and developing a method of measuring them

Leader orientation. Fiedler's definition of the leader's orientation emerged largely from earlier studies in which leaders were classified as either relation-ship-oriented or task-oriented. Relationship-oriented leaders look at others as coworkers and see close interpersonal relations as a requirement for accom-plishing the task. Task-oriented leaders show a strong emotional reaction against people with whom they have difficulty working. If they are forced to make a choice between getting the job done or worrying about interpersonal relations, they choose the task first and worry about interpersonal relations later. Following earlier research, Fiedler suggested that individuals could be placed along one continuum characterized by two basic leader orientations: relationship-oriented versus task-oriented.

LPC scale. Leadership orientation is measured by the least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale. Individuals are asked to think of a person with whom they have worked who they least preferred as a co-worker, and describe this person using sixteen scales. When the responses arc summed, an individual with a favorable description of the least preferred co-worker would have a high LPC score, suggesting a relationship-oriented leader. An unfavorable description of the least preferred coworker would result in a low score, suggesting a task-oriented leader.

Difficulty in interpreting the LPC scores has been a problem for Fiedler's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    | |the Spa. All of the therapist and technicians are skilled at the services they |…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2.1 Explain the relevant theories / models / frameworks/ assumptions related to the OB topic you have selected…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The situational leadership was developed and studied by Hershey & Blanchard in late 1960. It is the most acclaimed, utilized and effective leadership and influential tool in the history of the behavioral sciences (Situation.com). The situational leadership model is flexible tool, which enables different types of leaders and management to influence others effectively. This model stresses on the importance of the relationship between the leaders and the followers, but serves as a framework while analyzing every situation regarding the readiness level, which follower display, amount leadership and social economic support that leaders provides (Situation.com).…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hersey and Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory was created by Dr Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard in the mid-70’s. The fundamental basis of this theory is that there is no single ‘best’ leadership style and effective leaders have to adapt their styles depending upon the maturity level of delegates. So essentially the model rests on two fundamental concepts; leadership styles and the groups or individuals maturity level [2] .…

    • 7816 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler put forward his situational theory in 1958. He proposed that leadership was dependent upon the situation and assumed that all leaders are affected by an inherent set of leadership behaviours, which he believed was difficult to change. He identified two basic leadership styles which were task or relationship orientated. According to Tulsian and Pandey (2008) leaders who are task orientated will perform at the best level when they are in favourable or highly unfavourable situations, whereas leaders who are relationship orientated will perform best when they are in situations of medium…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Yukl (2002, p. 17), a contingency theory “describes some aspect of leadership that applies to some Contingency model of leadership 375 situation but not to others [...] contingency theory may explain how leader behavior typically varies from one situation to another”.According to Yukl (2010), a contingency theory “describes some aspect of leadership that applies to some Contingency model of leadership 375 situation but not to others contingency theory may explain how leader behaviour typically varies from one situation to…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leadership Approach Paper

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As it name suggests, the situational leadership approach states that leaders should use different approaches as situations change. In short, leaders should be flexible, embrace change as it comes, and be capable of adapting to it. The situational leadership approach is a model that was developed by Kenneth Blanchard and Paul Hersey in 1972. The theory states that leaders should match their leadership style to the maturity of followers and to the specific tasks on hand (Lerstrom, 2008). As people within organizations acquire more experience and become more knowledgeable about their job, leaders will need to adapt new leadership styles to keep these people motivated. According to May (2013) the core concept of the situational leadership approach is that “one size does not fit all”. The best leaders are not only those who have a vision, but…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The presence of different internal and external forces that affect the operations within a company provides the manager with a chance to choose the best reaction to a situation. The use of the situational leadership theory as a response mechanism is quite appropriate because it offers new changes that adhere to different goals intended within an organization (Lambert, Marler, &Gueutal, 2008). The experiences gained during a specific period will determine how well the management can respond to biting issues within the company. The objective is to get the employees working towards their goals without failure; an issue that disturbs every manager across the world (Silverthorne, 2000).…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some leaders are more concerned with getting the tasks at hand completed successfully in a timely manner. Other leaders prefer creating solid interpersonal relationships with their employees, because by being an oriented leader the employee’s performance will be higher. For example, if you have a high concern for completing a task and achieving results with little concern for having a relationship with people, you would be an authority-obedience manager. Another example: if you have little concern to complete a task or interact with people, you would be an impoverished…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ReviewFred-Fiedler%25E2%2580% TheoryOf-1663730.html& from=essay   (https://www.studymode.co /join.php?redirectUrl=%2Fe ReviewFred-Fiedler%25E2%2580 % TheoryOf-1663730.html& from=essay   (/reportpaper.php?id=1663730   Critically review Fred Fiedler’s theory of leadership. Fred Fiedler’s main premise behind his theory of leadership states that a person’s leadership style is fixed, and cannot be changed. He suggests that in order to maximise performance, the leader must fit the situation, or vice versa.…

    • 605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Contingency Model was created by Fred Fiedler in 1967; it states that the leader 's effectiveness is based on situational contingencies defined by two aspects: leadership style and situational favorableness (Miller, 2004). This model utilizes an instrument to measure an individual 's leadership orientation. The scores are ranked and leaders defined as Least Preferred Co-Worker (low-LPC or high-LPC leaders. Fiedler 's theory is that leaders have natural styles and, consequently, companies need to change the leader 's environment to suit that particular style (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2003).…

    • 2245 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership

    • 5470 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Fiedler (1967) explored the idea that there was not just one ultimate style of leadership for a given circumstance, but leaders would be more effective by varying their leadership style depending on the situations that faced them. So It is evident from the theories that every leader exhibits numerous leadership styles and traits at different point in time.…

    • 5470 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler Contingency Model

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The leadership style of the leader, thus, fixed and measured by what he calls the least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale, an instrument for measuring an individual’s leadership orientation. The LPC scale asks a leader to think of all the people with whom they have ever worked and then describe the person with whom they have worked least well, using a series of bipolar scales of 1 to 8, such as the following:…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fiedler created the least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale, where a leader is asked what traits can be ascribed to the co-worker that the leader likes the least. The model says that task-oriented leaders usually view their LPCs more negatively, resulting in a lower score. Fiedler called these low LPC-leaders. He said that low LPCs are very effective at completing tasks. They're quick to organize a group to get tasks and projects done. Relationship-building is a low priority.However, relationship-oriented leaders usually view their LPCs more positively, giving them a higher score. These are high-LPC leaders. High LPCs focus more on personal connections, and they're good at avoiding and managing conflict. They're better able to make complex decisions.…

    • 542 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nelson Mandela, Margaret Thatcher, Martin Luther King and Mother Teresa are just few of the names that come to mind whenever we think of great leaders. They have a vision of what they want and have the ability to communicate their vision in order to gain the support and cooperation of their followers. Often we find it easy to identify great leaders yet it is difficult to explain the qualities that make them great. In comparison, Nelson Mandela and Margaret Thatcher reinforce the fact that leaders have very different qualities and that leadership success is more complex than just identifying few traits or preferable behaviors. People who were studying the leadership phenomena then turned to the idea that effective leadership was dependent on a mix of factors. The Contingency Theories of leadership was developed to shed light on the leadership phenomenon.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays