Preview

Crito and Socrates

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
598 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crito and Socrates
Crito and Socrates
According to this dialogue, it was a last day of Socrates. Crito visited Socrates in prison and wanted to help Socrates to escape from the prison before the execution, but Socrates refused. There are two reasons can be discussed in this essay. Firstly, it can be that Socrates was afraid Crito may get into trouble for helping himself to get away from the prison. Socrates insisted his honor principle and he thought it is irresponsible to escape from the prison. Secondly, Socrates thinks that to obey the law is the most important rule in their society, and he does not want to breach this.

To begin with, Crito attempted to persuade Socrates to allow his friends to help him escape from prison. He presented many arguments that he can to persuade Socrates accept to escape. Crito was fears that others will criticize him for not rescuing his friend Socrates. However, Socrates was found out that this popular opinion was irrelevant. “We must not regard what the many say of us: but what he, the one man who has understanding of just and unjust, will say, and what the truth will say (p.25)” Socrates believed and argued back to Crito that public opinion is not always right, and he was more concerned about the matters of justice and injustice. Thus, Crito was persuaded to agree with Socrates argument here.

Then, Socrates came up with the point that it is better to do right than wrong, no matter under what the circumstances. Although jurors had treated Socrates unjustly, but it would be wrong to contrary the law by escaping. Socrates explained to Crito that, the relationship between citizens and laws is like child and parent. It is like, if citizens are not obeying the laws, it just like a child against to parent, and it is just not right. Socrates was believed that they should try to persuade the laws instead of escape from it. Since, Socrates thought he was found guilty by country, so if he escapes from the prison which is not complying with the law,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Crito Worksheet

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. Socrates says “As we have agreed so far, we must examine next whether it is just for me to try to get out of here when Athenians have not acquitted me.” In the exchanges following this statement, he obtains Crito’s…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates looks to the priest to tell him what exactly is pious so that he may educate himself as to why he would be perceived as impious. Found in the Apology, another of Plato's Five Dialogues, Socrates aims to defend his principles to the five hundred and one person jury. Finally, the Crito, an account of Socrates' final discussion with his good friend Crito, Socrates is offered an opportunity to escape the prison and his death sentence. As is known, Socrates rejected the suggestion. It is in the Euthyphro and the Apology that it can be deduced that Socrates is not guilty as charged, he had done nothing wrong and he properly defended himself. However, in the Crito, it is shown that Socrates is guilty only in the interpretation and enforcement of Athens' laws through the court system and its jurors. Socrates' accusations of being blasphemous are also seen as…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's "Crito" is a dialogue between Socrates and one of his closest friends Crito. The entire dialogue takes place in Socrates prison cell, where he awaits execution. Crito visits Socrates before dawn in order to persuade him to escape from prison and flee to another city or country. Crito has made all the necessary arrangements to smuggle Socrates out of prison to safety. To Crito's despair Socrates seems quite willing to accept his execution, and so Crito presents as many arguments as he can to persuade Socrates to escape. Socrates manages through a logical thinking process to demount all of Crito's arguments for escaping the prison.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story of Crito, Socrates is in prison and awaiting his execution that he was found guilty by corrupting the youth and also supporting other gods that the city of Athens did not. Throughout his trial, Socrates argued each of the things he was charged for and made it very clear that it was not just for him to be found guilty for these actions. The jury ended up finding Socrates guilty through a very slim vote that was not necessarily fair by any means. As Socrates sat in his cell, one of his very faithful friends, Crito, decided to come talk to him. He gave Socrates the opportunity to escape prison and live the life of a wanted man instead of facing his execution. As the story of Crito goes on, he asks himself a number of questions deciding on what he was going to do and whether it would be just or unjust for him to escape prison. Socrates eventually decided that he was going to stay in prison and face his execution instead of escaping, for the act of escaping prison would be unjust and breaking the laws of the city. I agree with Socrates’ decision that he made and feel like he did the just thing by facing his execution.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato's "Crito", another personality trait that Socrates displays is a sense of self-infatuation. In his discussion with Crito, they gloss over the escape plan they have arranged so that Socrates cans sneakily make his exit from prison. When delving into the worst-case scenarios that can play out, Socrates asks, " Is it fair enough that one should not value every human opinion but only some and not others? And not the opinions of everyone but of some and not others? What do you say? Isn’t this…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    • 1. In the Apology, Socrates recounts how he disobeyed the unjust order of the Thirty Tyrants to arrest a fellow citizen; he also claims that he will never stop philosophizing, regardless of what the legally constituted political authority commands. Yet, in the Crito, Socrates provides numerous arguments for obeying the decision of the legally constituted political authority, even though the decision (to put Socrates to death) was unjust. Critically assess whether Socrates’s view about political obligation in the two texts is consistent.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s theory of justice is about equality and that one deserves punishment if they do commit an unjust action. During the Crito, Socrates tries to correct a lot of points that Crito is trying to argue with him about, what it means to be justice. To be justice, means a human being that does good based on the laws that are emplaced according to the state. Good people according to Socrates are only worth considering. People that do good are considered moral people, and have opinions that should be regarded because their inputs are considered to be ethically correct. Being a human of ethical virtues means that they must not do wrong. Anything that is immoral, is considered immoral. We as humans may not intervene in activities that deem to be…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the reading CRITO the verdict of execution has already been given and now Socrates and colleagues must make the decision to flee the city of Athens or stay and face his fate. In this conversation you have Critos point of view and Socrates. Based on Critos reasoning he states three reasons why Socrates should stay, the first two being selfish but the third hitting home.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates argument is that people should follow the Social Contract Theory since it was the origin point of how people were born, how one got educated, and how one were to act through adulthood. In the book, Crito, Socrates states that by the time they reach adulthood they could either stay and accept their rules and laws or leave with their belongings. He eventually chose to stay in Athens and be executed rather than…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue, Crito, he presents an argumentative conversation between Crito and Socrates. The scenarios begins as Socrates has been arrested, therefore Crito attempts to convince him to escape. Crito’s opinions and ideas about escaping appeared to be based on the concern of what the public may say about them. Plato portrays Socrates, as a wise person seeking to improve other people’s wisdom, in this case, Crito. In addition, Crito’s ideas seem to gradually change as Socrates presents him what escaping from jail conveys, preventing him from doing rightly and just.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crito started his argument with effects of Socrates death on him and what would people think about Crito with letting his friend to die without helping him. As before, Socrates tried to examine if the opinion of the majority of people is important or not. Socrates stated that he should value the ideas from wise people and he disregard ideas from unwise people (66). He disregarded how many wise people are in the city or how many unwise people are there. So, the quantity of wise people was not an important aspect in the eyes of Socrates. Then, Socrates proved this idea by a question: “Come, then, what of such questions as this? When a man’s primarily engaged in physical training, does he pay attention to the praise or blame or opinion of every man or only to those of the one man who’s a doctor or a trainer.” (66).…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This establishes that whether or not Socrates originally believes his punishment is right, by staying in Athens his entire life, he made a commitment to follow the law-being just-therefore, if he is accused of breaking the law and is convicted by the courts of Athens, which represent the law, then he must complete his sentence, or else he is only becoming more unjust. Socrates later decides that although he could escape, it is better to try and do the right thing, despite having done unjust things in the past, and ultimately decides to carry out his punishment. This passage also further examines the gray area within the idea of just and unjust by saying that following the laws is just; however, the people of the court who determine which acts are within the bounds the laws and which acts are not, are also biased according to their own personal perceptions, meaning no human truly knows the intransigent definitions of what is just and what is unjust.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates was deeply concerned about morality. It was important for him to find out what is just, what is true, and what is good. These things were a way of life for him. Because of his beliefs, he influenced the thoughts of those who came after him. Socrates loved Athens. He fought in wars. He protested in political matters. He believed that true happiness comes from leading a good life. The point of my work on the previous pages were to break down the conversation between Socrates and Crito; to give and get an understanding of the dialogue. It is wonderful to have the kind of friendship that Socrates and Crito had. One can only imagine being the same way as Crito was about his dear friend. Surely, if my very good friend were in trouble, I’d want to save them as well. Being a good friend, though, means respecting my friends’ decisions and thoughts of reason. Surely I imagined Crito being very upset at Socrates. I imagined him flailing his arms around trying to get Socrates to understand where he was coming from and escape! I probably would have tried to physically move my friend, as if the building was on fire. Socrates’ reason was his inner voice, it stopped him from doing selfish things. Yes, he knew he was wrongly convicted. For him to go against the laws would have been morally wrong. He felt that was much worse. The fact that Socrates died for his beliefs is an inspiration to me and possibly to anyone who dare come up against what is…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death of Socrates

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Crito, you and other people who claimed to be friends to Socrates are all useless! How could you have been so cowardly, or lazy, or stingy, as to allow you 'friend' to die? Surely, with a little courage, energy, and money, you could have saved him."<br><br>Those are strong accusations coming from someone who obviously did not know Socrates as well as his other students or me. Although, I expected that people would react this way to my actions, or lack of actions, regarding Socrates death.<br><br>For Socrates, being executed was the only option available to him. Of course we, his friends, could have helped him to escape, but what would that prove? It would only go against everything that Socrates has taught us. It would also defy everything that Socrates stood for in life. Escaping punishment, would have been an unjust and cowardly act for him. Disobeying the law would set a bad example for his fellow citizens. In addition, it would ruin his reputation for being just and following the laws of the government. <br><br>Socrates believed that, although he was wrongfully accused, he was given a fair trial through the eyes of the law. The fact that he was given a fair trial means that he was given a fair punishment. If this punishment is not carried out, justice will not be served. Escaping punishment would cause a conflict between his teachings and his actions. This would eradicate the moral reputation that Socrates had built for himself throughout his life. The question he would have asked himself would have been, "What kind of example would I be setting if I dishonored my own teachings?" He saw his punishment as a contract between he and the government, and he firmly believed that agreements should not be broken. This is the same government that allowed him to live life as he chose, so why harm an institution that benefited him?<br><br>In addition, what kind of student would I be if I disregarded everything I learned from my teacher and helped him to escape? That…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crito By Plato Analysis

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Crito by Plato, Crito attempts to persuade Socrates to escape from jail so as to avoid his death sentence. This essay will set out to elaborate on the things Plato would say to both Crito and Socrates, if he were to be in jail with them. In addition, this essay will elaborate further on the reasons Plato would not agree that Socrates’ decision, to stay in jail and accept his death sentence, would eventually result in happiness. Thus, I will establish the stand that Plato would take sides with Crito who claims that Socrates should escape from jail to avoid his death sentence. However, to set the parameters of this essay, we need to understand Socrates’ and Plato’s perception of the term “happiness”.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays