Eastern Europe is a region that encompasses many different cultures, ethnicities, languages, and histories. Accorfing to Geert Hofsede the culturale is a conflict source and that the cultural differences are a disaster most of the times. Hofstede has created a cultural dimensions theory which represents a framework for cross-cultural communication. According to Hofstede, these framework describes the effects of a society's culture on the values of its members, and how these values relate to behavior, using a structure derived from factor analysis. The theory has been widely used in several fields as a paradigm for research, particularly in cross-cultural psychology, international management, and cross-cultural communication. If we explore the Romanian culture through the Hofstede’ş framework, we can get a good overview of the deep drivers of the Romanian culture relative to other world cultures.
Starting with the POWER DISTANCE which is defined as the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organizations within a country expect and accept that power is distributed unequally, we could say that Bulgaria scores high on this dimension (score of 70) which means that people accept a hierarchical order in which everybody has a place and which needs no further justification. Hierarchy in an organization is seen as reflecting inherent inequalities, centralization is popular, subordinates expect to be told what to do and the ideal boss is a benevolent autocrat
According to Hofstede’s framework, when speaking about Individualism, Bulgaria has a score of 30 which means that the country is considered a collectivistic society. This is manifest in a close long-term commitment to the member 'group', be that a family, extended family, or extended relationships. Loyalty in a collectivist culture is paramount, and over-rides most other societal rules and regulations. The society fosters strong relationships where everyone takes responsibility for fellow members of their group. In collectivist societies offence leads to shame and loss of face, employer/employee relationships are perceived in moral terms (like a family link), hiring and promotion decisions take account of the employee’s in-group, management is the management of groups
Masculinity / Femininity. A high score (masculine) on this dimension indicates the fact that the society will be driven by competition, achievement and success, with success being defined by the winner / best in field – a value system that starts in school and continues throughout organizational behavior.
A low score (feminine) on the dimension will indicate the fact that the dominant values in society are caring for others and quality of life. A feminine society is one where quality of life is the sign of success and standing out from the crowd is not admirable. If we refer to Bulgaria, according to the framework, they have a score of 40 which means that we can speak about a feminine society focused on people value equality, solidarity and quality in their working lives. Conflicts are resolved by compromise and negotiation. Incentives such as free time and flexibility are favored.
Another dimension is focused on the Uncertainty avoidance which resumes to the beliefs and institutions created by the members of a culture that feel threatened by ambiguous or unknown situations. In the case of Bulgaria, the country has a score of 85 which means a high preference to avoid uncertainty. They are maintaining a strict code of belief and behavior and they are intolerant to unorthodox behavior and ideas. In these kind of cultures, people have an inner urge to be busy and work hard. They place a high value on precision and punctuality and security, which is an important element in individual motivation.
Long term orientation is related to the future oriented perspective of the society, whether is a pragmatic future-oriented perspective or a conventional historical short-term point of view. Here Bulgaria has a 0 score. In countries with a high score for these dimension we will see that they put a high value on traditions, unlike the countries with low score in which the changes are fast accepted without putting to much value on traditions.
Geert Hofstede’s framework is applied for a long time in the business environment in order to make the environment more efficient, eliminating cultural mistakes.
Prihor Adina Oana
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Second Edition, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, 2001.…
- 2284 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Following this, Hofstede’s Cultural Model was introduced in the literature review and critically analysed. This model included five dimensions:…
- 3178 Words
- 12 Pages
Best Essays -
HOFSTEDE, G, (2001), Cultural Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2ND EDITION, SAGE PUBLICATIONS, LONDON…
- 1428 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures ' consequences; Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.…
- 15014 Words
- 61 Pages
Good Essays -
It focuses on the degree the society reinforces individual or collective, achievement and interpersonal relationships. In the individualism society, the ties between individuals were loose and people 's achievement and freedom could be valued. Compared with that, in the collectivism society, the relationship between individuals was tight. All the collective types such as family were emphasized by the members.…
- 453 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of Hofstede’s five dimensions, which antagonized many viewers, is the concept of individualism and collectivism. Hofstede describes collectivist as individuals with many trustworthy connections with other individuals as loyalty and trust are a key value in their cultural beliefs. Opposing, individualist do not share their trust so easily and tend to have few close relationships and only the closest family members are trusted and…
- 707 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
& Organizational Studies 12 (4): 73-88. http://jlo.sagepub.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au (accessed June 16, 2011). Magala, S. 2009. Crosscultural life of social values and organizational analysis: An introduction to the special themed section. Organization Studies 30 (9): 925-931. Sage. http://oss.sagepub.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au (accessed June 23, 2011). McShane, S. L., A. Travaglione, and M. Olekalns. 2010a. Organisational behaviour on the pacific rim. 3rd edition. ed. North Ryde, N.S.W.: McGrawHill. McShane, S. L., A. Travaglione, and M. Olekalns. 2010b. Organisational behaviour on the pacific rim: Self assessment exercises. http://www.mcgraw-hill.com.au (accessed June 18, 2011). McSweeney, B. 2002. Hofstede 's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis. Human Relations 55 (1): 89. ProQuest. http://proquest.umi.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au (accessed June 24, 2011). Migliore, L. A. 2011. Relation between big five personality traits and hofstede 's cultural dimensions: Samples from the USA and india. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal 18 (1): 38-54. Emerald. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13527601111104287 (accessed June 12, 2011). Minkov, M., and G. Hofstede. 2011. The evolution of hofstede 's doctrine. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal 18 (1): 10-20. Emerald June 23, 2011). Munley, A. E. 2011. Culture differences in leadership. IUP Journal of Soft Skills 5 (1): 16-30. Business Source Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com (accessed June 12, 2011). Porter, L. W., and G. B. McLaughlin. 2006. Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly 17 (6): 559-576. Science Direct. http://www.sciencedirect.com (accessed June 23, 2011). Savage-Austin, A. P., and A. D. Honeycutt. 2011. Servant leadership: A phenomenological study of practices, experiences, organizational effectiveness, and barriers. Journal of Business & Economics Research 9 (1): 49. ProQuest. http://proquest.umi.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au (accessed June 19, 2011). Schein, E. H. 1985. Organizational culture and leadership. San Franciso: JosseyBass Publishers. Shao, L., and S. Webber. 2006. A cross-cultural test of the five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership '. Journal of Business Research 59 (8): 936-944. Science Direct. http://www.sciencedirect.com (accessed June 23, 2011). Smith, P. B., M. F. Peterson, and S. H. Schwartz. 2002. Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior: A 47-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 33 (2): 188-208. Sage. http://jcc.sagepub.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/ (accessed June 25, 2011). Solansky, S. T. 2008. Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 14 (4): 332-341.…
- 3320 Words
- 14 Pages
Best Essays -
Hofstede’s Dimension of culture determines how a society is in managerial sense. Each dimension represents how close an individual might be to others, or whether or not the country is passive or aggressive. After reading the information and understanding, the study will then discuss Hofstede’s determination of Japan.…
- 6620 Words
- 27 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Culture is the attitudes, customs, values, and beliefs a human being has learned from generation to generation. In businesses, there are many employees with different cultural backgrounds. Even though Mexico and America are neighbors, their ways of living are completely different. If both culture are not understood, accepted and respected it can cause problems in an organization. Hofstede’s dimensions of culture identify four dimensions that study the differences of attitudes and values of employees to improve communication and be successful: power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, and masculinity/femininity.…
- 605 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
But “Culture is a man made part of the environment”(Herskovits, 1948, p.17). Geert Hofstede in 1980 explained that Culture consists of shared mental programs that control individual’s response to their environment. It has been very easy to understand culture in terms of Hofstede’s dimensions and compare countries based on these studies. These are Power distance, Uncertainty avoidance, Individualism-Collectivism, Femininity and Masculinity.…
- 793 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This paper explores, in accordance with Hofstede 's indices, the culture dimensions of young PDk» who have had some exposure to business tnanagement. It is shown that this group of Polish respondents score high in Power Distance and Uncertainty Avoidance, average in Individualism, are moderately above average in Masculitiity as compared to Hofetedc 's Hermes data-base results. These culture characteristics are discussed from the perspective of their possible impact upon the adaptation of Western managerial concepts in Poland. culture 2 dimensions, cross-culttire matiagement, Poland…
- 5483 Words
- 22 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the dimension of Power-Distance Croatia scores high with a score of 73 which means the people accept a hierarchical order in which everybody has a place and which needs no further justification. In this type of society people expect to be told what to do and this is accepted as the norm. (Hofstede Centre, n.d.). Slovenia also scored high in the dimension of Power-Distance with a score of 71. What this displays is two of the former eastern European countries, are very similar in their societal beliefs in hierarchal order and the populace was still routed in a…
- 1327 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Table 1 Selected countries CharismaticTeam-orientedSelf-protectiveParticipativeHumane-orientedAutonomous My score665444Albania5.705.874.554.515.153.81Indonesia 6.155.924.134.615.434.19Morocco4.815.153.265.324.103.34South Africa5.165.233.635.054.793.94 Part III According to the Hofstedes cultural dimensions, Albania has a high power distance. It is a hierarchical society in which people respect status and peoples position and recognition. Organizations are characterized by high level of centralization. Employees should be given orders. Individualism is rather low. Therefore, this is a collectivistic country. People are long-term committed to their groups, families and organizations. Loyalty is crucial. High level of masculinityin Albania indicates that people are driven by competition and achievements. Having a high score for uncertainty avoidance means that it relies on planning. Emotions are not very much shown. The society is acceptable for new ideas and innovations. Albania is a pragmatic culture. It implies that people believe that truth depends on the situation, context and time. Albania scores low in indulgence. People in this country are inclined to cynicism and pessimism. They emphasize a lot their…
- 1608 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Let’s start with two factors having huge social impact on Bulgaria - the 500-year-rule of the Ottoman Empire and the communist regime. Almost 600 years of our late history the common Bulgarian citizens spent in obeying to the established rule and living with the decisions someone else made for them. For hundreds of years our will, individuality and creativity was surprised by the Ottoman empire and less than a hundred years after this rule ended – we adopted another one – the communist. The constant presence of foreign political pressure and the disappointment from the Bulgarian government made the Bulgarian skeptical and reserved towards the State. The low standard of life in Bulgaria compared to the one in the rest of the European countries doesn’t please the people either. Unfortunately, the Bulgarians are more prone to complaining than…
- 1143 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
| 35 - Highly decentralized, supported by middle class; direct, Participitative communication; control is disliked; leadership is challenged to show expertise…
- 2459 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays