Preview

Deputy Shrader Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
141 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deputy Shrader Case Study
I believe Deputy Shrader was completely wrong. When I first read the facts of the case, I was on the fence but the moment he begin yelling and the conversation went past 20 minutes, he was in the wrong. If I were Jessie, I would not feel free to go in my own home. Not only did Deputy Shrader decide to go to Jessie's house to question him about the stolen chemicals after acknowledging that there was not enough evidence to get a warrant, but he preceded to Jessie's house with no warrant and plans to question Jessie. Not to mention he also did not read Jessie his Miranda rights.

Jessie's confession was involuntary. Just as in Berkemer v. McCarty, a court can find that Jessie was unsure whether or not he was "in custody." Deputy Shrader definitely
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Cop Keating Case Study
    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cop Keating Case Study

    COP Keating was established in a remote location near the town of Kamdesh of Nuristan province in North Eastern Afghanistan approximately 25 km from the Pakistan boarder along the only improved dirt road in the Kamdesh district. OP Fritsche was established 2.2 Km straight line distance to the southeast, non-line of sight with an elevation difference of 2150 ft. from Keating. The COP was surrounded by extremely rugged, mountainous high ground and is positioned to interdict historic trafficking routes to and from Pakistan.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study: Pasco Sheriff's Office
    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Study: Pasco Sheriff's Office

    On 05/19/2016, Joseph Cairo contacted the Pasco Sheriff`s Office by telephone to report a grand theft.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kentucky V King 563 US 452 Case Study
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kentucky V King 563 US 452 Case Study

    Facts: Police officers were in pursuit of a suspected drug dealer, and were led to an apartment complex. The officers ended up outside of a certain apartment, were the smell of marijuana emanated. The police knocked loudly, and from inside the apartment they heard movement, and the police believed that the sounds were an indication that evidence was being destroyed. The police announced their intent to enter the apartment, kicked the door down to find drugs and drug paraphernalia in plain sight, and arrested King and others. They continued to search the apartment and came across other evidence. King argued that due to the officers not having a warrant…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antonio Richard Rochin Case Summary
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Antonio Richard Rochin Case Summary

    The action of the police officers were completely wrong, both legally and morally. The officers violated Antonio Richard Rochin’s 4th, 14th and 5th Amendment rights. The officers never obtained a warrant to enter and search Rochin’s residence; therefore, making any evidence discovered inadmissible in court. In addition they violated Rochin’s 4th Amendment rights, and no one should have their home broken into by those who’s jobs are supposed to protect us based on some hearsay evidence. It would be understandable if these officers had enough evidence to create probable cause to create enough reasonable suspicion to get a warrant before searching Rochin’s house. Instead the officers chose to take the law into their own hands by “jumping…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Case 8.1 Search And Seizure
    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case 8.1 Search And Seizure

    So Aldo did his job and alert that in the driver's side door smelled drugs which give Wheatley probable cause so that the police officer to search Harris truck. The reason, the police officer use a warrantless search and arrest was because at the commission moment it was not feasible to obtaining warrant prior to the search and arrest. Aldo's alert investigation give substantial evidence that Harry has committed a crime that lead to the discovery of "200 loose pseudoephedrine pills, 8,000 matches, a bottle of hydrochloric acid, two containers of antifreeze, and a coffee filter full of iodine crystals- all ingredients for making methamphetamine." Once again, the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution allows the police officer like Wheetley to conducted a warrantless search to Harris's truck because in that circumstances it was likely that the evidence will be destroyed. As a result, the trial court permitted the evidence to be submitted at trial that most likely will confirm the charged of possession of pseudoephedrine against…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Booker Hudson V. Michigan Case Brief
    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Booker Hudson V. Michigan Case Brief

    Facts- Detroit police obtained a warrant authorizing a search for drugs and firearms at the home of Booker Hudson. When police arrived to execute the warrant, they announced their presence but waited “three to five seconds” before turning the knob of the unlocked front door and entering Hudson’s home. Police discovered large quantities of drugs, including cocaine rocks in Hudson’s pocket and a loaded gun placed in between the cushion and armrest of a chair in which he was sitting.. Hudson was charged under Michigan law with unlawful drug and firearm possession. Hudson moved to suppress the evidence.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee V. Garner
    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tennessee V. Garner

    On October 3, 1974, Memphis Police Officers Hymon and Wright were dispatched to answer a "prowler inside call." When the police arrived at the scene, a neighbor gestured to the house where she had heard glass breaking and that someone was breaking into the house. While one of the officer radioed that they were on the scene, the other officer went to the rear of the house hearing a door slam and saw someone run across the backyard. The suspect, Edward Garner stopped at a 6-feet-high fence at the edge of the yard and proceeded to climb the fence as the police officer called out "police, halt." The police officer figured that if Garner made it over the fence he would get away and also "figured" that Garner was unarmed. Officer Hymon then shot him, hitting him in the back of the head. In using deadly force to prevent the escape of Garner, Hymon used the argument that actions were made under the authority of the Tennessee statute and pursuant to Police Department policy. Although the department's policy was slightly more restrictive than the statute it still allowed the use of deadly force in cases of burglary. Garner's fathers' argument was made that his son was shot unconstitutionally because he was captured and shot possessing ten dollars that he had stolen and being unarmed showing no threat of danger to the officer. The incident was then reviewed by the Memphis Police Firearm's Review Board and presented to a grand jury of the Federal District Court and the Court of Appeals. Neither of these presentations of the incident took any action.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Brief in Irac Format
    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Brief in Irac Format

    In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for kidnapping and rape. Arizona police took him to the police station and interrogated him for two hours. After the interrogation, Mr. Miranda had confessed to the crimes, and provided officers with a written confession. Language at the top of the written confession stated that the confession was given freely and voluntarily without any threats or promises. In addition, the language stated that Mr. Miranda was fully aware of his legal rights. However, Mr. Miranda was not advised that he could remain silent and have an attorney present at the interrogation. Subsequently, the statement was entered into evidence at trial, and Mr. Miranda was convicted and sentenced to prison.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Petitioner Vs Jardines Research Paper
    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Petitioner Vs Jardines Research Paper

    In this paper I’m going to detail the judicial process of a Supreme Court case, which was the first of its kind. The Supreme Court did not have original jurisdiction over this case. It traveled through each juridical system before reaching the Supreme Court. This case was of interest to them, not to question it the defendant was guilty, but were his constitutional rights violated in the process of prosecuting him. This case began with an anonymous tip that the defendant was growing illegal contraband at his home. The DEA assigned Detective Padraja and Detective Bartelt to sit on the home. After making the decision that no one was home the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unlawful Search: New Jersey vs. T.L.O.
    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unlawful Search: New Jersey vs. T.L.O.

    After the search at the school was conducted TLO’s mother and the police were informed. TLO was taken to the police station and was questioned, which she then confessed that she had been dealing drugs at school. Because TLO had confessed the state of New Jersey had to file delinquency charges on TLO. After this was taken care of, TLO requested that the evidence in her purse was to be restricted. This was because she believed that the search in her school was violating the fourth amendment. She also wanted her confession to be restricted. She said that she confessed because of what was found inside the purse and said that if the purse were not searched for she would not have said a confession. The court denied it but they considered that the search was…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Law Enforcement Training Case Study
    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Law Enforcement Training Case Study

    If you could develop a training program for in-service officers, what subject matter relevant to 21st century policing would you develop?…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Participants' Professional Standards
    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Courtroom Participants' Professional Standards

    The prosecutor’s seemed to think they were above the law, however, Judge Gerald Lee knew otherwise. The prosecutor’s offered no apologies and swore there wasn’t any prosecutorial misconduct and that the judge had no right to investigate them to begin with. It is assumed the reasoning for prosecutor Mellin’s misconduct is because his personal involvement with the…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea Bargain
    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plea Bargain

    Brief: Respondent was arrested and charged with possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 84 Stat. 1260. On October 17, 1991, respondent and his attorney asked to meet with the prosecutor to discuss the possibility of cooperating with the Government. At the beginning of the meeting, the prosecutor informed respondent that he had no obligation to talk, but that if he wanted to cooperate, he would have to be completely truthful. As a condition of proceeding with the discussion, the prosecutor indicated that the respondent would have to agree that any statements he made could be used to impeach any contradictory testimony he might give at trial if it went that far. Respondent conversed with his counsel and agreed to proceed under the prosecutor’s conditions. The respondent admitted to knowing that the package he attempted to sell to the undercover cop did contain methamphetamine. Respondent claimed that he did not know Shuster was manufacturing methamphetamine at his residence and later confessed that he did know of Shuster manufacturing methamphetamine in his residence. Respondent minimized his role in Shuster’s methamphetamine operation by claiming that he had not visited Shuster’s residence for at least a week before his arrest. The government showed the respondent surveillance evidence showing that his car was at Shuster’s residence the day before the arrest. The meeting ended on the basis that the respondent failed to provide completely truthful information. Respondent was tried on the methamphetamine charges and took the stand at his own defense. He maintained that he was not involved in the methamphetamine trafficking and he had thought Shuster was using his home laboratory to make plastic explosives for the CIA. He denied knowing that the package he delivered to the…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Junior Deputy
    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Junior Deputy

    During Junior Deputy this year, I learned that smoking is bad for your health. And, alcohol is bad for you, too. Smoking causes tar to build up in your lungs and can lead to cancer. I know cancer is a bad disease because I have lost my grandpa and grandma to cancer. Alcohol kills brain cells. It is important to learn and if you do not have all your brain cells, you will not be as smart which means you will not do as well in life.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    deputy manager
    • 422 Words
    • 4 Pages

    deputy manager

    City & Guilds Level 5 Diploma in Leadership for health and social care and children and young…

    • 422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics