DERIVING CONSENSUS RANKINGS VIA MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY
1AmyPoh. AL, 2M. N. Saludin, 1M. Mukaidono
1Faculty of Science and Technology, Meiji University
2Faculty of Management & Defense Study, National Defense University of Malaysia
ABSTRACT
Purpose – This paper takes a cautionary stance to the impact of marketing mix on customer satisfaction, via a case study deriving consensus rankings for benchmarking on selected retail stores in Malaysia.
Design/methodology/approach – ELECTRE I model is used in deriving consensus rankings via multicriteria decision making method for benchmarking base on the marketing mix model 4Ps. Descriptive analysis is used to analyze the best practice among the four marketing tactics.
Findings – Outranking methods in consequence constitute a strong base on which to found the entire structure of the behavioral theory of benchmarking applied to development of marketing strategy.
Research limitations/implications – This study has looked only at a limited part of the puzzle of how consumer satisfaction translates into behavioral outcomes.
Practical implications – The study provides managers with guidance on how to generate rough outline of potential marketing activities that can be used to take advantage of capabilities and convert weaknesses and threats.
Originality/value – This paper interestingly portrays the effective usage of multicriteria decision making and ranking method to help marketing manager predict their marketing trend.
Keywords: Marketing mix, Customer satisfaction, Retailing, Benchmarking, Multicriteria decision-making, ELECTRE I method
Type of paper: Research Paper
2
1. INTRODUCTION
With increasing globalization, local retailers find themselves having to compete with large foreign players by targeting niche markets. To excel and flaunt as a market leader in an ultramodern era and a globalize world, the organizations must strive to harvest from its marketing strategies, benchmarking and
References: Biggiero, L., Laise, D. (2003a), "Comparing and choosing organizational structures: a multicriteria methodology", Human Systems Management, No.22. Biggiero, L., Laise, D. (2003b), "Choosing and evaluating technology policy: a multicriteria approach", Science and Public Policy, Vol. 30 No.1, pp.13-23. Boone, L., Kurtz, D. (1992). "Contemporary Marketing". Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press. Borden, N.H. (1964), "The concept of marketing mix", Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 4 No. June, pp.2-7. Brezillon P & Abu-Hakima S., (1995), "Report on the IJCAI-93 Workshop on Using Knowledge in its context", AI Magazine 16 n°, pp.87-91. Brezillon P., (1996), "Context in human computer problem solving: a survey", Research Report 96/29, LAFORIA, 37 pages. Camp, Robert C. (1989). "Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance". Milwaukee, WI: Quality Press. Ferrell, O., Hartline, M., Lucas, G., Luck, D. (1998). "Marketing Strategy". Orlando, FL: Dryden Press. J.T. Buchanan, E.J. Henig, M.I. Henig, (1998), "Objectivity and subjectivity in the decision making process", Annals of Operations Research, to appear. McCarthy, E.J. (1960), "Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach", Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL. M.I. Henig, J.T. Buchanan, (1996), "Solving MCDM Problems: Process Concepts", Journal of Multi Criteria Decision Analysis, 5, pp 3-12. Pomerol J.-Ch. and Barba-Romero, (1993), "Choix multicritere dans l‟entreprise: principe et pratique", Hermes, Paris. Pomerol J.-Ch., (1995), "Artificial intelligence and human decision making", EURO XIV Proceedings, R. Slowinski Ed., pp. 169-196. Pomerol, J.C., Barba-Romero, S. (2000), "Multicriterion Decision Management: Principles and Practice", Kluwer, Dordrecht, Roy B Roy, B., Bouyssou, D. (1993), "Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas", Economica, Paris. Roy, B. (1985), "Méthodologie Multicritère d 'Aide à la Décision", Economica, Paris. Saaty T.L., (1980), "The Analytic Hierarchy Process", McGraw Hill. Sharif, A.M. (2002), "Benchmarking performance management systems", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 9 No.1, pp.62-85. Simon H.A., (1997), "Administrative Behavior (4th expanded edition; first edition 1947) ", The Free Press, N.Y. Simon, H.A. (1997), "Models of Bounded Rationality", MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Vol. Vol. 3: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason. Vetschera R., (1986), "Sensitivity analysis for the ELECTRE multicriteria method", Zeitschrift Operations Research, vol. 30, pp. B99-B117.