Preview

Difference Between Hammurabi And Beatitudes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
721 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Hammurabi And Beatitudes
The 10 commandments, 8 beatitudes, and Codes of Hammurabi are all similar in the sense that it defines the law and restrictions of that culture. We find that each culture and religion has their own laws and rules but they vary according to the ideals and beliefs of each groups. The largest difference between these set of rules is the idea that they reinforce.

The ways they differ is numerous because the ideas behind them support different ideals and cultures. First, the Code of Hammurabi. The Code of Hammurabi was a list of rules and consequences to a large variety of situations that vary from assault, theft, and murder among the civilians under the rule of Hammurabi and all rulers who used this code. The basis behind this which was much
…show more content…
The code of Hammurabi wasn’t fair in many cases because of the history behind it, at the time the social status and rights of women were much less than what they should’ve been and it took social status into heavy consideration so the higher class citizen was much more likely to get the better end of the situation whether they were in the wrong or not. The difference between the beatitudes are something a little harder to define because not only do they both come from religion but the same religion: Catholicism. The beatitudes in contrast to the commandments focused on the change of the person and how they can be filled with spiritual happiness through charity, humility, and loving one another. This is the teaching of Jesus recorded from the sermon on the Mount, because although they provide a way to the afterlife with God forever it also gives of a way to happiness spiritually here on Earth during our constant effort to achieve heaven. The 10 Commandments, a very well known set of rules, is very similar to the beatitudes …show more content…
The similarities vary between the simple fact that they are guidelines that tell us how to live, the best way to live a happy life for the people under it’s influence. The first way that they can relate is the probably most simple and obvious fact that they are a set of rules or guidelines. These all are given to a group or society of people to follow so that it can make theirs, the “ruler”s or everyone's life much easier. They are meant to follow the norms and rules that are entitled with that culture. The next is how they are all meant to help, whether they do or not is not for me to say but the creation of these rules are for it to make the people better people, easier to manage, or situations easier to handle, like most or all set of rules. Of course we know that these rules and laws influence multiple different groups of people and culture but they all are expected to follow them and respect them because they are given to them by what they believe have divine or godly influence. The 10 commandments were believed to be given to us by God himself to Moses on the mountain. The 8 beatitudes were taught by Jesus who we believe is the son of God and the one true “representative” for God on Earth among humans as a human. Then the Code of Hammurabi, was developed by Hammurabi who led his people that these rules

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The year is 1700 BC in Babylon and a new age has just began. A leader by the name of Hammurabi has introduced one of the oldest recorded set of laws. Hammurabi was a powerful military leader. He led Babylon to take control of most of Mesopotamia. He wrote the laws after being instructed to write them by many powerful gods including Shamash, the great god and judge of Heaven and Earth. Hammurabi’s Code includes 282 laws with punishments for each law. Hammurabi’s Code was described in the bible as “an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth”. Hammurabi’s Code was just because it protected the weak, promoted the social welfare, and came from a higher power.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When Was Hammurabi Unfair

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi was told by Shamash to write the laws, some might say he is a fair ruler but he was NOT. Was Hammurabi’s Code unfair? Yes, because his punishments were too harsh the laws weren't equal to women and children and his laws did not protect the weak.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that Hammurabi´s code is too harsh. The reason I think this is because why should a builder die because they built a weak house and the person inside died,why should someone lose their hands for stealing, should a slave's ear get…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some of Hammurabi's codes were just but most of them were unjust. Hammurabi's codes were too rough and unfair to people because son's would get their hands cut off for things that could have been handled differently and better,debts were not fair, and slaves were treated differently than free people.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The people of Hammurabi essentially believed that whatever Hammurabi instilled was by way of the divinity. To unify the people in a secular religious believe and moral code, Hammurabi needed to install a comprehensive set of laws known has the Code of Hammurabi. The code consisted of 282 laws in which Hammurabi expressed were a devotion to god and his responsibilities as a king. The codes provided a structure to life and the consequences that would follow if such codes were not abided by. The Code of Hammurabi elicited some equalities while insinuating some strong, blatant, inequalities amongst the different classes of people from slaves to the aristocratic class. For example code number 6 in the Code of Hammurabi states, “If a man steals valuables belonging to the god or to the palace, that man shall be killed, and also the one who received stolen goods from him shall be kill.” It seems that Hammurabi was not a forgiving type of leader in that he had laws that were to be followed and the consequence of forfeiting those laws would typically result in…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, The Code of Hammurabi was harsher than The Laws of Manu. The Code of Hammurabi was for all the people no matter what class they were classified in, even though slaves and women were mostly treated like property in all places at this time. The Code of Hammurabi was also made more as what is morally right and to help maintain order in the civilizations; while the Laws of Manu were made more on the religious side and to promise the people eternal life if they followed these laws. The Code of Hammurabi gave more of an “if you don’t follow these rules you will just die” tone to it. The Code of Hammurabi was also straight forward and to the point, while the Laws of Manu gave more detail.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Codes Dbq

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many civilizations created law codes for people to follow. Documents 1,3,4,5, and 7 are all related because they all are law codes that even though are law codes from religious civilizations ,they somehow enforced people to go by the rules, codes that don’t directly come by their god or gods. In other…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi's Code

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mesopotamia, “the Land between Rivers,” was one of the greatest civilizations of the world. It flourished around 3000 B.C. on the piece of fertile land, now Iraq, between the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers. In 1790 B.C.E., King Hammurabi conquered the neighboring city-states of ancient Mesopotamia, creating a Babylonian empire. During his reign, Hammurabi established law and order, and in about 1790, he had about 300 laws governing family, criminal punishment, civil law, etc. written on stone pillars for all to see. These laws were based around the main principal “an eye for an eye and a life for a life.” They were unfair, unjust, and based on the social classes. The code of Hammurabi was extreme and even tyrannical; it controlled Mesopotamian society through fear, not justice.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Hierarchy

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Code of Hammurabi was written by King Hammurabi, who had begun ruling the Babylonian Empire in 1800 BC. Hammurabi used his military leadership skills to conquer many smaller city-states. He believed that the Gods chose him to bring justice and order to his people. Shortly after Hammurabi’s rise in power he created his code of laws known as “The Code of Hammurabi”, which were written to upheld honesty, protect property rights, maintain social hierarchy and define all relationships and aspects of life. The laws were publicly displayed so that everyone would have the equal opportunity to understand and study them. The laws were expected to be followed by everyone. The punishment for breaking the laws were very severe, however they aided in the compliance of the citizens of the Mesopotamian society.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bob the Builder

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many great societies are regulated and shaped by the laws they are governed by. A well-defined set of laws can help keep a society running like a well-oiled machine and keep a civilization going for hundreds of years. Two early civilizations that used well-structured laws were the Babylonians and the Canaanites. The Babylonians with the Hammurabi Code and the Canaanites with the Covenant Code were very similar codes that helped to keep both great societies in check. There should obviously be similarities between the two codes as they are both dealing with people who are related culturally, racially, and living in somewhat similar conditions. There also are similarities when dealing with incidents and when infringements occur what penalties will incur. There are quite a few striking differences though, mainly dealing with the religious side of the codes. While both codes allowed their respective civilizations to become great, there were a vast amount of differences between the two forms of law.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Laws of Manu and Hammurabi’s code are both a set of laws and codes that seem to guide people from different classes on what their role in society is. Both set of laws/codes are very straightforward they tell each group of people what they are expected to do and what punishment they will receive if they disobey the law. Both set of laws seem to focus on the same thing women's rights, marriage, and laws in general. The Laws of Manu were harsh but they were specified for certain people whereas the Code of Hammurabi was a set of laws for everyone no matter what caste they were in. Although both set of laws were tough, I believe The Code of Hammurabi was way harsher than the Laws of Manu.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi History

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Yet the Code of Hammurabi was significant in the fact that it was written out in a simple way with direct examples of what would happen if the illegal acts were performed and what the punishment would be. The codes also held set guidelines for what workers were paid such as those for doctors, farmers, and builders. The code gave sets of rules to follow by the Babylonians that could be used in most aspects of life to help make sure that there was a consistent system of law to solve issues and help others understand where they were in society's standings. The laws were made to equalize society for a sense of justice to protect the weaker people yet it clearly favored the men and the rich over everyone else. This created a bigger social rift in social classes and gender which continued to call for a need of one primary ruler to govern and unify those under his watch. This created the sense that the king was all powerful which people should follow and trust in him and his system. The codes made unity and security in the king's growing empire by setting a standard of morals and values to be followed while keeping class structure equil for all in an ideal…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Code of Hammurabi

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before analyzing specific laws and rules of the Babylonian time, it is important to verify the reasons Hammurabi wrote the code and his responsibility in the social system of the empire. To begin, understanding the code of Hammurabi requires a basic knowledge of the Babylonian way of living. An example of this is looking at only the first eight laws in the code, and catching onto the pattern of consequence following these accusations. Six of the first eight laws say that the perpetrator must be put to death for their crimes. This mere fraction of the whole code prominently shows how Babylonian life was vastly different from modern times. The fact that most minor offenses now had deadly consequences in ancient times shows how control must have been different in a Babylonian social system, since a leader had to take into consideration the difficulty in convicting somebody fairly to a crime, and the social class of that person (slave or free)(Reader 13-14). Overall, Hammurabi built his code around a social system that was in need for stability.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics and laws in the Huang-He river valley and Mesopotamia had several similarities and differences. The law code from Mesopotamia was Hammurabi's Code; made by its king, Hammurabi, meanwhile in China it was the Mandate of heaven. The Hammurabi's Code helped keep order in the society, on the other hand, the mandate of heaven gave the king…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By a simple glance, it is not hard to tell that the second and third items of the Five Precepts precisely overlap two of the Ten Commandments while the first and fourth, which prohibits killing and lying, are approximate equivalents of “You shall not murder” and “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor”. Despite the argument proposed by a minority of scholars in the field that there were potential contact between these two religions, and Jesus Christ could have possibly visited India during his mysterious early years that are not recorded in any historical documents , this paper tends to believe that these four admonitions were incorporated into the basic principles of the two major religions as a result of human communities’ need for order and prosperity. These four baleful deeds are just individual-level embodiment of those human qualities that result in the scourge of war, fraud, rape and other issues in the modern world. These vices are of no difference in any time and space and they hinder the development of a sound society. To abstain from harming living beings, or the biblical version “You shall not murder”, is an injunction against human ferocity; To refrain from stealing is a rejection to selfishness; To restrain from sexual misconduct or “adultery” is a prohibition of insatiable lust; To quit lying is to resist dishonesty. The Roman law and the Code of Hammurabi also have…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays