Preview

Difference Between Kantian And Utilitarianism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
84 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Kantian And Utilitarianism
First off, we know that Kantian doesn’t agree with Utilitarian when it comes to certain principles. So Kantian would be immoral when it comes to on-line gambling. Kantian believes that it can cause a negative impact because Kant believes that people should make rational decisions; and making a rational decision would be moral. So, if someone knows that they have a 1 in a million chance of winning money, that would be an irrational decision, if the decide to still spend money in
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Difference Between Utilitarianism And Deontology
    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between Utilitarianism And Deontology

    Deontology: A nonconsequentialist ethical theory that claims an act is to be evaluated in terms ofits accordance with a specified set of rules. (Mosser, 2013)Virtue Ethics: An ethical theory that focuses on the character of the agent in evaluating moral behavior, in contrast to utilitarianism or deontology; often associated with Aristotle. (Mosser, 2013)Utilitarianism: A consequentialist ethical theory that evaluates moral claims in terms of their outcomes and to the extent these outcomes generate the greatest benefit for the greatest number. (Mosser, 2013)I was at the grocery store checking out in the self checkout lane, and I noticed that A single mom and her 3 kids were having to take out items because she had reached her limit, I noticed…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    utilitarion vs kantianism
    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    utilitarion vs kantianism

    The main rule of utilitarianism is to perform the one action that will provide the greatest amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain to the greatest number of people. In our case study, one would think the choice is quite easy, if we let go of Gary, we are providing no happiness for anyone and a great deal of pain to his family and friends and to ourselves. However, the one person that will get pleasure from this scenario is perhaps Gary, who is suffering. According to the utilitarian theory, the right action to perform would be to do everything in our power to save Gary, because if we save him there would be a lot more people that will be happy then if we were to let him die. There is only one person who would get pleasure from letting Gary go, and that is Gary himself. One could argue that the person watching Gary suffer will provide that person with a great amount of pain, but if we were to let Gary go, as painful as it may be to watch our friend die and be the one responsible, we may find ourselves happy that he did not suffer. The Greatest Happiness Principle suggest that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness. In our case study, saving Gary would promote happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary, letting Gary succumb to his injuries and letting go will promote the reverse of happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary. According to Mill, pleasures are qualitatively different, depending on their origin, meaning some pleasures should be counted more heavily. Does the pleasure we will receive in saving Gary and watching him live outweigh the pleasure Gary might receive by not suffering and dying a quick death. According to…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism
    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism

    In the article, “Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism”, Louis P. Pojman explained the grounds on which utilitarianism has been attacked and showed some possible response to its defenders which imply his positive attitude towards utilitarianism [1] . In order to argue that thesis, Pojman’s one important premise is the response to the no-rest objection. He believed that the agent should aim at maximizing his or her own happiness as well as other people’s happiness and is best not to worry much about the need of those not in our primary circle.[1] .…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Arguments On Ethical Decision-Making
    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant's Arguments On Ethical Decision-Making

    In this analytical paper I’ll be analyzing a scenario about a five year old girl who is in renal failure and is in need of a kidney transplant. In this the father is the only one compatible with her, but he does not want to donate his kidney to save her life. The scenario will be analyzed through the deontological/Kantian and the consequentialist/utilitarian viewpoints in ethical decision making. It’ll also be analyzed by deciding which perspective would be relevant and a discussion of what I as a doctor would do following the ethical view point of my choice.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparison of Direct and Indirect Utilitarianism
    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comparison of Direct and Indirect Utilitarianism

    British philosopher, John Stuart Mill, served many years as a member of parliament and worked diligently to bring forth liberal ideas. Amongst these ideas was the distinction of utilitarianism, or the act of doing what is right for the greatest number of people. Yet, just discussing the idea of right versus wrong for the masses was not enough, Mill’s determined there were two forms of utilitarianism; act, the direct form, or sanction, the indirect form. Much like formal logic with deductive and inductive reasoning, act and sanction utilitarianism strive for the same goal but have different ways of reaching it. Both forms of utilitarianism are seeking to find the best possible outcome for the largest number of people and using that as a measure of right versus wrong, yet by examining the differences of act utilitarianism and sanction utilitarianism, it will become clear that sanction utilitarianism is superior and more easily attainable.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism
    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

    On this topic of gay marriage I’ve chosen the two ethical theories of utilitarianism and the Kantian ethics theory. On the pro side the utilitarianism theory plays a huge role when referring to this topic. Some may argue that it is constitutional and some may say that it just isn’t the right thing to do in this country. With this theory the actions are said to be judged in terms of promotion of human happiness. If someone is happy why it should matter what the law or government thinks. It’s important in addition with this topic because gay marriage is something that has been going on for a couple years now. The news and media has made it obvious, and with this argument there are two sides. Should gay marriage be acted upon as something normal…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism
    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

    This essay aims to argue the views of two different theorist, Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant, with regards to their views on moral worth of an action. The idea of good and bad creates heated debates among many, but this essay will successfully unravel the layers of Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism and his belief that all our motives are driven by pleasure and pain. While arguing Kant’s opposing argument that moral worth of an act revolves around democratic attitudes, and that moral truths are founded on reasons that is logical to all people. When one breaks down both theories, it occurs that Kant’s theory comes out to be the more sensible one in numerous aspects.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Utilitarianism with Christian Ethics
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Utilitarianism with Christian Ethics

    The ethical teachings and values of utilitarianism and Christian ethics are similar in some aspects, yet however are diverse in others. Utilitarianism is a generally teleological ethical system, where the outcome is said to justify the act. The act is considered ‘good’ if it brings about the greatest good for the greatest number. Christian Ethics, however, can be quite different. Many aspects of its ethics are deontological, for example, the Decalogue and Natural Law. There are other differences and indeed some similarities which will be considered throughout this essay.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Kantianism And Utilitarianism
    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between Kantianism And Utilitarianism

    From the vantage point of the history of ethical theory, there can be little doubt…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism
    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    According to Kant, he believes that the only thing unconditionally good is good will. Good will is the idea of people having to do ones moral duty. Kant’s ethical theories are based off of the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives, as stated during class, act only on those rules that you can rationally will to be universal. In response to Kant’s theory, I believe that good will is not the only thing that is unconditionally good. I believe this because there will be many instances in life where having a good will can lead to tragic situations.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Kant And Utilitarianism
    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Difference Between Kant And Utilitarianism

    In this essay we will discuss what Kant’s and a utilitarian’s view on insider trading would be. As we have discussed in previous essays, Kant believed that moral rules could be known through reason and not just by observation (Shaw and Barry 69). For me this is the basis of all decisions that we make and why I would support Kant’s point of view on insider trading. Utilitarianism concentrates on producing the greatest amount of happiness and using it as a standard to determine if an action is right or wrong (Shaw and Barry 62). Utilitarianism requires too much concentration on individual aspects of what the greatest happiness is and basing moral standards around them.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Difference Between Utilitarianism And Relativism
    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between Utilitarianism And Relativism

    The difference between utilitarianism and relativism is that in utilitarianism, something is good when it does the good for the most people. For example killing thousands of people to save billions. This is in reference to when the United States dropped the atomic bomb on Japan. It killed thousands of people, but it was for the good of the world, and ended World War II. Another example from our textbook is of the trolley problem, where five people were on the track and the train was headed their way. They would surely be killed if the train continues. However, there is a switch that the train could be diverted into, and one person is on that track. According to utilitarianism, “you would be permitted and required to pull the switch.”…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Utilitarianism
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant Vs Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism and Kant’s respective have different ways for demonstrating whether an act we do is right or wrong. Corresponding to Kant, we should look at our maxims, intentions, of a particular action. Kantians believe “If we are rational, we will each agree to curb our self-interest and cooperate with one another” (Shafer-Landau, Russ 194). In other words, humans are rational beings capable of rational behavior and should not be used purely for self-interest. On the other hand, Utilitarian’s believe that we should do actions that produce the greatest amount of happiness. However, this could associate using people as mere means and lead to the sacrifice of lives for the greater good.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Gambling is it Right or Wrong?
    • 2711 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Gambling is it Right or Wrong?

    it is regarded in moral terms. (Binde,2005). Since the time when the guards for Jesus cast lots for his clothes, when Las Vegas was built and now today with the availability of online gambling, this issue has caused concern and had its supporters and opponents. While done responsibly, gambling can be a fun and sometimes rewarding activity. On the other hand it can be a huge problem for some. Gambling is very addictive and can lead to many problems for those who become addicted. People have been known to empty their bank accounts, lose their homes, destroy relationships, and even turn to crime, because of gambling. In this paper I will explore the many types of gambling, both sides of the ethical problems of gambling and how it affects us, and how classical theory can be applied to solve those problems. I will also show how relativism applies to the problem and how I feel about the matter myself.…

    • 2711 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Deontology Vs Utilitarianism
    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Deontology Vs Utilitarianism

    I believe Utilitarianism is much better ethical theory compared to deontology when making an ethical decision because ‘the end justifies the means’ instead of ‘the end does not justify the means’. When making moral decisions utilitarians believe each decision must achieve the greatest amount of good and decreasing the amount of bad that could happen. Deontological ethics says otherwise it tends to follow a strict set of moral rules showing an absolute approach to most decisions. These ethical theories can be said to be complete opposites when compared especially when it comes to using someone as a means to an end, consequences of decisions, and the use of the universal code of ethics.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics