Preview

Direct Democracy vs Representative Democracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
958 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Direct Democracy vs Representative Democracy
Direct Democracy vs Representative Democracy

The term Democracy is derived from two Greek words, demos, meaning people, and kratos, meaning rule. These two words form the word democracy which means rule by the people. Aristotle, and other ancient Greek political philosophers, used the phrase, `the governors are to be the governed', or as we have come to know it, `rule and be ruled in turn'. The two major types of democracy are Representative Democracy and Direct
Democracy. Clearly the arguments for and against each form of democracy are plentiful. However, it is my belief that theoretically, Direct Democracy is the superior form of political rule. Due to problems with in the direct democratic system, its use as a practical form of government is not even thinkable.
Therefore, in order for any form of democracy to function, Representative
Democracy is the superior form of political rule. Jean Jacques Rousseau is considered by many to be the `Grandfather' of direct the democracy theory. Rousseau's ideal society would be where the citizens were directly involved in the creation of the laws which are to govern their lives. He maintained that, "all citizens should meet together and decide what is best for the community and enact the appropriate laws. Any law which was not directly created by the citizens is not valid, and if those laws are imposed on people, that is equivalent to the people being enslaved. The citizens of a society must both develop and obey `the supreme decision of the general will', which is the society's determination of the common good. It is not even thinkable that all citizens will agree on what good is. Rousseau recognized this and accepted a term of majority rule. Those who voted against a policy which is found to be the best for the general, must have been thinking of personal gains, rather than the gains of the entire society. The feature which distinguishes direct democracy from other forms of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    AP Euro DBQ

    • 846 Words
    • 1 Page

    unity. Flora Tristan, a political activist, states that if the people come together and unify, then,…

    • 846 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As of now, we only have two different democratic representation models: trustee and delegate. The trustee model says that representatives should be allowed to use their own judgment when deciding upon how they will vote on particular legislation. A trustee tries to lead his/her constituents, rather than follow them. Trustees are willing to run the risk of losing re-election if that means voting for the right thing, and I respect that.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Correct. The English nobility gained the most benefits from the Magna Carta, which established limitations on the power of the king.…

    • 2223 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First, there are two types of democracies direct and representatives. “ A direct democracy has no representatives and the citizens are involved in the day-to-day work of governing the country “. And a representative democracy is “ citizens who elect leaders to represent their rights and interest in government “. A direct democracy is different from a representative democracy because in representatives democracy the citizens hold the ultimate power, but there are no kinds of representatives, unlike a direct democracy.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The notion of the common good, as MacIntyre (1998) understands it, differs fundamentally from the notions in which the good of a community is logically constructed posterior to the goods of its members. To be more specific, MacIntyre (1998: 240) fiercely criticizes the concepts of the common good in which the good of the whole can "be arrived at by summing the goods of the parts" or by attaining public goods. Certainly, says MacIntyre (1998:239-240), it is a mistake to think that the practice of the common good "is no more than the summing of the goods pursued by individuals as members" of a particular community. Community, MacIntyre emphasizes, is not merely an instrument employed by individuals to attain their own goods. Otherwise, members'…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (c) Is pressure group politics in the UK better described as pluralist or as elitist?…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The "common good" is a central and unifying principle of social ethics. It is the sum of those conditions of social life which allow social groups and their individual members relatively thorough and ready access to their own…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. General Revenue Sharing offers states and localities even greater flexibility than block grants because they…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    American sports are American because they are a reflection of societal values and cultural norms during the rise of an industrializing America. These recreational activities became popular economic enterprises with specializing labor roles, set rules comparable to the standard workplace protocol in other industries at the time, and were intentionally “civilized” in such a way that they became more profitable for those in charge. This civilizing also meant a specialization of labor as many athletes became more professional with irreplaceable skills. American sports in the late 19th century are reflective of greater historical trends regarding industrialization. American sports became American over the late 19th century by gradually integrating rising class values into the creation of sporting rules and practice. The urban and extensively diverse atmosphere in which popular sports developed necessitated “Americanizing” them in such a way that sporting rules became cohesive with the exclusive class values of participants so that they opposed non-native culture and benefitted the social group of the rule-makers. “American” sports are competitive, and thus leaving something to be gained, were inherently both profitable and popular, thus presenting fine arena’s for a commodification of the participants and practices by a leisure class.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should England convert to a different government or stay as a Constitutional Monarchy? Every person believes in a type of government, some people believe in democracy, and some people republican government, and many people believe in many more types of government. What form of government do you believe in? Well, I postulate England should tolerate the Representative Democracy government. Representative Democracy is in a higher quality than Constitutional Monarchy.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state of Georgia utilizes recall and legislature. In direct democracy, people become more involved with politics, and have greater power speaking their own opinions which can improve democracy. Direct democracy can be good by serving the people that take part in it, but it has it’s downfalls as well. Although, people in the community come together, direct democracy in my opinion grants people in the community too much power. This can lead to a disadvantage in direct democracy by causing potential harm to minority groups. This system set to where citizens have direct power in decision making. It’s evident that minority groups have less power it’s like the wealthy versus the poor. Case in point, according to the text the battle over illegal…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upon the founding of America, a great deal of pressure was placed onto the Founding Fathers to create a system in which the central government will not acquire too much power and the citizens will be well represented. A representative democracy was, overall, a more effective answer to the question of how to govern the new country rather than a direct democracy after seeing the effects that the Articles of Confederation created when too much of the power of the government was given to the people and their states. A stronger central government was needed without taking away the voice of the people, and that’s what was decided on. However, even though this way has proven to be the most effective way to govern a country, it has its flaws within the system. Corruption finds its way through the system in ways of interest groups and political parties. This system is not immune to factions nor the effect of those factions, and those effects often make their way to important matters within the government.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will prove from my point of view, that three characters with their actions, decisions and timing were most responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This distinction the Madison makes between a democracy and a republic is that he sees democracy as a dangerous thing, but he sees a republic as a way to prevent danger from occurring. Madison describes a democracy as "a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person. " Madison continues to say that these societies "have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention. " When Madison talks about democracy, he meant a more direct democracy where the people have more of a say in the government. Madison, however, thought that was not a good idea because he thought that the people weren’t informed enough to make wise decisions.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Founding Fathers began designing America’s government in 1787, one of their greatest fears was the possibility of the dumb majority using their power to pass uneducated and disastrous legislature. They feared “the mob”, the everyday citizens that had little schooling and knew almost nothing about politics. To avoid giving the voters too much power, a Representative-Democracy style government was created, a system where citizens would vote for a person or group to represent them in making legislature. Referendum votes bypass the politicians and ask for the people’s opinion directly- they are direct votes where the entire country is invited to vote on an issue, which give the people a chance for their voices to be heard. While a good…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays