An event like this would be comparable to assimilation, which has occurred countless times over in history and was usually what divided cultural groups from their own culture and religion. For instance, the Spanish assimilated the Inca against their will and then slaughtered the ones who didn’t cooperate (D, Page 72-73). The Inca’s perspective of the world was forcibly changed and in doing so, cost future societies the variety of ideas and knowledge the Inca could have provided. Many others civilizations have also been persecuted for viewing the world differently. Take the First Nations, they involuntary had their cultures and perspectives warped by the Europeans. Not only were the First Nations incapable of sharing their ideas, they were commanded to sever all ties with their views and beliefs. This caused most of native cultures to die out and was the aftermath of an even closer connected homogeneity. Despite assimilation robbing various cultures of their beliefs and views an increased acceptance of heterogeneity has begun to renew these marginalized …show more content…
Heterogeneity is what allows others to generate perspectives constructed from various other worldviews. Comparatively, the Great Exhibition instituted by Prince Albert had exhibitors from far and wide present a variety of new machines and products to the public for admiration and education (B, 1516). This event displayed a society that utilizes the diversity of others to bring people together and create new concepts and philosophies. The event itself was meant to convey feeling between others and also for others to build on their philosophies. Clash of perspectives would also spark new philosophies and ideas. In this case, Charle Darwin specifically discussed of human evolution from ape-like ancestors in The Descent of Man. This out-right opposed the perspective of the biblical story of creation and sparked a long history of extensive and intense controversy (B, 1516). Charles and the followers of the biblical story of creation had to slowly integrate these new and diverse viewpoints into their own views and build on them. Two ideas opposing each other may create controversial topics, but it also allowed others to develop on their own