Doctor Assisted Suicide Persuasive Essay
Terminal illnesses cause great pain and suffering. For example here are some words from Andy Whelan, “...we as parents could offer no comfort - Jessica pushing us away as she rode out her searing pain in solitude...her body stiffened and her face contorted in pain.” (Zhang). Mrs. Whelan’s daughter Jessica Whelan was only four years old when she was diagnosed. Jessica had a form of cancer called neuroblastoma and had been fighting cancer for 13 months. In November she was given just a few weeks to live and later died due to cancer. Patients should be allowed to have doctor-assisted suicides because they should have the right to die and end their suffering, but some people are against the legalization because they believe they will make the
…show more content…
wrong decision. First, everyone should have the right to die especially if there is suffering involved. Patients are allowed to refuse treatment that would prolong their life ("Assisted Suicide"). Patients should be in charge of the drugs they take; they should have the choice if they can take drugs to shorten their lives. Suffering is prolonged and the compassion of a doctor is taken away. (Foreman 61). People will start looking at doctors differently, even if they have no control over the issue. It’s legal in five states already, and it’s not easy to get approved (CNN). There must be regulations for who should be approved doctor-assisted suicides. Ill patients should not have to spend their last days hating life; they should go when they want to go. Secondly, people have rights that should never change, and it should be a right to die when and how you chose. Ultimately, patients make their decisions; this should just be another decision they make ("Assisted Suicide"). Patients know themselves and their body better than their doctors do, they should have the final say. “It should be considered as much of a crime to make someone live who with justification does not wish to continue as it is to take life without consent.” (ProCon.org). If they don’t want to live why make them live? “A state's categorical ban on physician assistance to suicide -- as applied to competent, terminally ill patients who wish to avoid unendurable pain and hasten inevitable death -- substantially interferes with this protected liberty interest and cannot be sustained.” (Foreman 61). In the Constitution, it states everyone is entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Some people are ready to die; they know when they are ready to die. On the other hand, people on the other side of the argument have strong points as well, but they can easily be proven wrong.
People against the law want to prevent abuse and protect patients from evil doctors (ProCon.org). In the states where this is legal, there are extensive legal and requirements to the point where abuse is nearly impossible. People are concerned that patients will be pressured to make a choice that would end their life (ProCon.org). Patients could have as much time as they need, this is a life ending decision. Doctors might not feel comfortable, morally, knowing medicine prescribed by them killed someone (ProCon.org). Doctors would not have to perform the act if they don’t want to, the patient could find someone to prescribe it to them instead. People are worried about people making the wrong choice, but nothing is set in stone. If they want to change their mind, then they can. Patients should be allowed to have doctor-assisted suicides because they should have the right to die and end their suffering, but some people are against the legalization because they believe they will make the wrong decision. All people should have the right to die, have control of their life, and end their suffering if they want to. Some people are worried about the person making the wrong decision, but nothing would be set in stone until the day they take the
drugs.
Doctor assisted suicides should be legal because it’s an option, not an obligation, they should have rights too.
wrong decision. First, everyone should have the right to die especially if there is suffering involved. Patients are allowed to refuse treatment that would prolong their life ("Assisted Suicide"). Patients should be in charge of the drugs they take; they should have the choice if they can take drugs to shorten their lives. Suffering is prolonged and the compassion of a doctor is taken away. (Foreman 61). People will start looking at doctors differently, even if they have no control over the issue. It’s legal in five states already, and it’s not easy to get approved (CNN). There must be regulations for who should be approved doctor-assisted suicides. Ill patients should not have to spend their last days hating life; they should go when they want to go. Secondly, people have rights that should never change, and it should be a right to die when and how you chose. Ultimately, patients make their decisions; this should just be another decision they make ("Assisted Suicide"). Patients know themselves and their body better than their doctors do, they should have the final say. “It should be considered as much of a crime to make someone live who with justification does not wish to continue as it is to take life without consent.” (ProCon.org). If they don’t want to live why make them live? “A state's categorical ban on physician assistance to suicide -- as applied to competent, terminally ill patients who wish to avoid unendurable pain and hasten inevitable death -- substantially interferes with this protected liberty interest and cannot be sustained.” (Foreman 61). In the Constitution, it states everyone is entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Some people are ready to die; they know when they are ready to die. On the other hand, people on the other side of the argument have strong points as well, but they can easily be proven wrong.
People against the law want to prevent abuse and protect patients from evil doctors (ProCon.org). In the states where this is legal, there are extensive legal and requirements to the point where abuse is nearly impossible. People are concerned that patients will be pressured to make a choice that would end their life (ProCon.org). Patients could have as much time as they need, this is a life ending decision. Doctors might not feel comfortable, morally, knowing medicine prescribed by them killed someone (ProCon.org). Doctors would not have to perform the act if they don’t want to, the patient could find someone to prescribe it to them instead. People are worried about people making the wrong choice, but nothing is set in stone. If they want to change their mind, then they can. Patients should be allowed to have doctor-assisted suicides because they should have the right to die and end their suffering, but some people are against the legalization because they believe they will make the wrong decision. All people should have the right to die, have control of their life, and end their suffering if they want to. Some people are worried about the person making the wrong decision, but nothing would be set in stone until the day they take the
drugs.
Doctor assisted suicides should be legal because it’s an option, not an obligation, they should have rights too.