Preview

Drug Courts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
827 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Drug Courts
The drug court is a unique effort that uses the occasion of a drug offence arrest as an intervention opportunity for drug offenders even though historical problems in criminal justice diversion and referral programs the Dade County success rates have shown that these problems can be overcome through unique collaborative relationships, innovative treatment design, and the elimination of conventional gaps in the referral- treatment-monitoring process. It is the purpose of this paper to explore the concept that drug courts are a far more effective method of punishment for drug offenders than the traditional route of incarceration. The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 provided a potential one billions dollars for the subsequent five years to set up drug courts. As jurisdictions move forward in the establishment of such courts, it is essential to consider the conceptual and clinical elements that have made drug courts successful in drug rehabilitation and crime prevention far more than incarcerations. The first drug court in Dade County, Florida, created in 1989, was the prototype. The three-phase Miami program for first and second cocaine offenders begins with arrest and overnight incarceration in the Dade County Stockade, and appearance the following morning before the drug court judge. The program was developed under the direction of Dade County Superior Court Judge Herbert Klein, with the assistance of Michael Smith, MD, and Director of Substance Abuse. After two years of the drug court 's operation, 4296 felony drug possession arrestees had been diverted to the program. Of these, 1600 had graduated the three-phase program with a 3% re-arrest rate 1153 were still in the program with a 7% re-arrest rate; 500 had their charges dismissed after program entry; and 1043 failed to comply with the program. Also, 90% of the arrestees who were offered the program accepted the program the other 10% were arraigned in regular Supreme Court no


References: WWW.DDRS.COM Promptly at 8 o’clock on Tuesday night at the community church in my home town largo, Maryland, there are life changing effort from alcoholics in the community, I have had the pleasure of witnessing these efforts with my own eyes and I must say it is truly eye opening. The reason for these meetings is for alcoholics to have time to relate to others and share their feelings and concern with their peers. At the start of the meeting the group leader leads the group with a prayer and words of wisdom, shortly after they allow the person in a attends to help themselves to snack and drinks alcohol free, normally the administer name tags but on the particular day on my attendant they were out. The group leader made it clear that if you were not in the mode to speak all you have to do was say pass in order for me to not insult the others in attended at the meeting I sat in the circle with the group. The group leader asked each individual person to introduce there selves being that the name tags where not at the groups disposal, after being ask for their names they were given an opportunity individual to share what was on their mind most of everyone spoke, A guy named Louis who shared said he is ready for the rain to end and broke down in tears. Right then and there I realize that being a alcoholic was not a life chose but more so a sickness. The group leader would often lecture as well as ask others very specific questions to different individual. At the end of the meeting the group leader close with more words of wisdom as well as a prayer. The A.A meeting was a great experience as well life changing I was very proud to see others with courage talk about their biggest life problems. I would defiantly recommend these meetings to anyone with addiction, on the simple fact of other and peers being able to relate to the same problem that you have make you feel like you’re getting thru it together. {copied directly from the notepad I brought to the meeting wanted to keep it authentic sorry for all the eras}

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The research by Dirks-Linhorst, Groom & Linhorst (2012) focused on the effectiveness of substance abuse treatment as an intermediate sanction on probationers in a jail setting who had been previously unsuccessful in completing community based treatment. Dirks-Linhorst et al. (2012) sought how this established method of treatment would differ among two separate groups of state probationers. One group of probationers was sent directly to jail upon their conviction and would participate in the Choices Program. Upon successful program completion, they would be released. The second group of probationers was placed on state probation at the time of their conviction, but when they violated their probation they were then incarcerated to participate…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Per the NADCP National Association of Drug Court Professionals objective is to transform millions of lives of defendants through addressing issues they face with anti-social behavior they display within the community. Per NADCP 492 Drug Courts existed. By June 30, 2012, 2,734 Drug Courts were operating in every U.S. state and territory (Finn, P., and A.K. Newlyn.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug courts were put into place to seek the underlying cause of drug addiction which many believe can also relate to drug related crimes. The first Drug Courts started in Dade County, Florida. Since 1989 Drug Courts have expanded to every state and there ae more than 2,100 working drug courts in the United States (Tiger, 2011 p. 172). The structure of all courts is different but there are three main common features in each court. The first being “Legal and external pressure” this means it is a judges duty to mandate or sentence a person to drug courts. Second there is a second judge that sits on the Drug Court committee that reviews progress each week and a probation officer that does random drug testing every week. Drug testing is a key factor so that there is an accountability factor on every member of Drug Court in order to stay clean. The third factor that all courts have in common is there is a verity of sanctions and privileges given to members of the courts. Sanctions for members that have broken the rules and privileges for those that have been doing good and continue on the right path and stay clean (Tiger…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past, drug addicts who were convicted of drug related crimes were most commonly either sent to treatment or incarcerated. I have experienced both and did not benefit much from either one. In 2001 I was in a fairly new program called Drug Court. Drug Court is a unique and extraordinary program that gives addicts the tools they need to endure life without using drugs.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are over two thousand drug courts in America, each one specializing in its own level of drug abuse. A drug court’s primary role is to handle cases with offenders of substance abuse. They offer offenders an opportunity to enter a rehabilitation program in lieu of sentenced jail time. The road to recovery is of course challenging and difficult, making the drug courts so strict and costly. Drug courts were generally created for non-violent drug abusers. Although these offenders are given the chance to avoid jail time they are extremely supervised by the court officials. Drug tests, substance abuse treatment, must make regular appearances in court and constant checkups are required to continue in the program. These offenders’ cases are usually dismissed due to their involvement in the program or their sentence is only shortened. Participation in these programs are completely voluntary and if qualified to enter, the offender must agree to complete all the tasks given and report to every summoning from the court. If an offender doesn’t complete the program, they can be prosecuted or their sentence will be revised and will be placed in jail. Drug courts are considered one f the most effective ways to eliminate drug abusers and avoiding incarceration. While in the program offenders are monitored and results of every drug court case is very astonishing, but the long term effect of these cases are beyond the rulings of the court. It is not known if those who participated in the programs continued their lives drug free. These courts have been examined and tested to see if the results justify the cost of the program. The operations evaluated such as the number of participants, referrals issued, and drug court graduates. The cost savings of processing the offenders through the program instead of straight jail time, and results compared with those who have been completed their sentenced jail time as opposed to those in the programs. The therapeutic jurisprudence theory…

    • 346 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead of overloading the traditional court system with to abundant amount of drug cases, involving the same faces of the reoffending drug abusers. The drugs courts were developed to take care of all of the drug cases to lighten the load on the traditional courts. Drugs courts can now spend more time with the offender to work to fix his or her substance abuse problems, by attending different meetings and programs. Drug courts have shown to be very…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Drug Court Cases

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Prior to ARI funding, the public defender and the probation officer serving the drug court managed mixed caseloads of both drug court and non-drug court participants. ARI funding allows the probation officer and a contract defense attorney to focus solely on the needs of drug court offender. Evidence-based/promising practices in use: LSI-R assessment, cognitive-behavioral therapy, Thinking for a Change curriculum, drug court Target population and reduction goals: Knox County has operated a drug court since 2008. From 2007 to 2009, Knox County committed to IDOC an annual average of 70 offenders who would have been eligible for diversion to a drug court program or other community-based supervision program. Knox County’s 25% reduction goal for the grant period, based on recent commitment levels within the target population, is 16. In February 2012, in exchange for supplemental funding, the reduction goal was increased to 24. Overview of jurisdiction: Knox County, located in north central Illinois, covers approximately 719 square…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Case Study

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1989 the first drug court was introduced in Miami Dade County, Florida. Drug problems in Florida were substantial and mirrored many states across the United States. Crack Cocaine was on the rise as so was the crime across the United States. The many types of drug courts have been put in place to decrease recidivism, drug use and restore lives and families. Drug Courts are designed to serve as the alternative for incarceration. A big factor in criminal justice is figuring out what programs work for the community which are the taxpayers, and the offenders we are serving and helping. Drug courts are very successful out of the many correctional programs that exist. First discussing the background model that a comprehensive range of drug courts…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug Courts Recidivism

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page

    Drug courts seek to halt the revolving door of addiction and crime by linking addicted offenders to drug treatment and rigorous judicial monitoring. They bring together judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, treatment providers, and court staff in a collaborative effort to address the offender’s underlying substance use disorder and enforce compliance with court orders. Drug courts also use a system of graduated incentives and sanctions to help substance abusers achieve and maintain a drug-free life. Today, thanks to well-established evidence that drug courts reduce substance abuse and recidivism—including a groundbreaking study by researchers from the Center for Court Innovation—there are approximately 3,000 drug courts in the United States.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A number of historical developments have set the stage for the shift from being primarily “tough on crime” to effective treatment, but the critical role of substance abuse treatment in the history of rehabilitation in American Corrections is often overlooked. Substance abuse treatment has demonstrated success over the…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States’ court system, jails, and prisons contain a significant number of offenders that have been convicted with drug related offenses, many of which are suffering from drug addictions. Drug abuse is becoming more prevalent, as drugs are becoming more and more readily accessible. Drug courts are a form of intervention used to treat drug-addicted offenders. Drug courts use the power and authority of a judge to keep a drug offender in treatment, providing rewards for successes and sanctions for failures. This form of intervention is used in order to reduce drug use, reduce crime, save money and restore lives.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Appraisal

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With drug courts existing for over 25 years, some of the research presenting tangible results have been scarce. Because the structure of drug courts varies, not all of them are concerned with monitoring and improving their individual program even if it is imperative among the 10 key components. Some may find it challenging to implement strategies that will continuously evaluate programs due to lack of time and expertise (Rempel, 2010). Drug court professionals believe that the few evaluations that do exist do not necessarily influence practices or grant support from the public. However, what drug court professionals fail to realize is that there are ways for them to implement action research, a form of research that “provides immediate and useful feedback about everyday program operations and performance”, with limited resources and still retain information that can identify areas of success along with problem areas that need improvement (Rempel,…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Drug Courts

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Drug Courts came about as a result of a backlogged court system and a steady, rapidly increasing prison population. Drug courts are a form of diversion that helps the offender through rehabilitation and the community through an increased sense of protection, which serves the best interest of everyone. Drug Courts are community based intermediate sanctions that incorporate treatment principles into the Criminal Justice System and divert drug offenders from traditional punishments of probation and prison. The objective of drug courts programs is to treat the underlying problems of addiction among drug offenders and eliminate participants' future drug use and crime.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The criminal justice system utilizes the application of diversion programs as a means of helping defendants become more productive, law-abiding citizens. This occurs when the formal proceedings against an accused individual are suspended while the defendant participates in a court supervised treatment program. This is commonly implemented in cases of drug possession or when the defendant has an obvious problem with substance abuse. Upon successful completion of the diversion program, the defendant’s charges can be dismissed.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug Crimes

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bibliography: (2007). Updated Report on Drug Offender Sentencing Issues. Saint Paul: Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics