Preview

Dwight D

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1281 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dwight D
Dwight D. Eisenhower – Atoms For Peace Rhetorical Analysis

The speech, Atoms for Peace, spoken by Dwight D. Eisenhower is able to strongly send the message to the audience. During the time period of the speech the world has been going through a lot of technological advancements, but also devastating wars. The United States has been testing with nuclear weapons, and has used atomic bombs during World War 2 on Japan. But as the United States has advanced their nuclear weapons they have kept their progress very secretive, until Eisenhower’s speech, which revealed a lot of what has been going on.
Part of Eisenhower’s message was to educate the audience, in this case the American citizens. But also, Eisenhower hoped to ease the fear the Americans had about nuclear warfare. Eisenhower eases the fear of the Americans by stating, “The United States knows that peaceful power from atomic energy is no dream of the future. The capability,already proved, is here today.” He explains that the uses of nuclear weapons will be to promote peace rather then using it to simply kill. As the rhetor, Eisenhower clearly explains the message of promoting the use of nuclear weaponry for peaceful acts and as a defensive tactic against the other countries building up their nuclear weapons. While the audience of Eisenhower’s speech is the citizens, the rhetorical audience is the United Nations General Assembly. This is evident because Eisenhower’s speech takes place in the meeting of the United Nations General Assembly, and the council members are also able to respond to the situation and are able to affect the decision and change it. While addressing the General Assembly, Eisenhower also understands that the American citizens will hear the speech, as a result he speaks to both throughout the speech.
The audience of Eisenhower’s speech is the American citizens. This is clearly expressed because of the in depth explanations of the weapons. He explains that the government was keeping the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nike System Effectiveness

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A development that could have been preventable through possible disarmament negotiations after the war, had the US not underestimated the USSR. Considering the aftermath of World War II, the USSR had lost an estimate of 22 million lives and had large decimated areas of land. The US couldn’t possibly see the USSR as a military threat due to the heavy casualties the nation had sustained. In all likeliness, the US may have thought that “nuclear diplomacy” would be enough to quell the USSR if the need arose. A decade later the USSR had displayed its very own jet-bomber called the Mya-4 “Bison”. In 1955, an American air force attache, had observed twice the number of Bisons that were estimated to have been made. This jet-bomber was far more capable of inflicting injury upon the US than the Tu-4, and to further the anxiety of the US, the USSR had detonated its first thermonuclear weapon in…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Micro212Chpt1-6

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages

    3. In a speech before the American Society of Newspaper Editors (April 16, 1953), President Eisenhower stated: "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children...This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron." Along such a production-possibilities curve, President Eisenhower implicitly recommended in the quotation that there be:…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ca 370 Exam 1

    • 3120 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Audience- “mediators of change” as a result of the speech, War Message- Primary audiences, Congress: declare war, American people- define, reassure, rally…

    • 3120 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    His address was a warning to his successors of one of the many things they would have to be worried of in the coming years. As well as, expressing concerns about planning the futures of dangers of massive spending, especially deficit spending. In contrary, The people spent more than twice as much on national security in 2011 than they did in Eisenhower’s final year in office. Eisenhower was concerned about the growing size and cost of the American defense establishment since he became president in 1953. He expressed some of those concerns in his previous address, which shocked some of his listeners.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Our subject was some of the problems that beset our world”(Eisenhower para 1) Eisenhower was having a conference with the Prime Ministers and Foreign Ministers of Great Britain and France. This is a great use of Ethos, credibility, talking about the problems going on in the world. It was also a great way to open up his speech and bring in his audience. Eisenhower also says “Never before in history has so much hope for so many people been gathered together in a single organization. Your deliberations and decisions during these somber years have already realized part of those hopes.”(Eisenhower para 3) He is using pathos and logos, emotions of hope and logical of numbers, to make the assembly aware that they gathered together in hope of peace and hope for better to come. Eisenhower also states “... the United States will remain steadfast in its support of this body. This we shall do in the conviction you will provide a great share of the wisdom, of the courage, and the faith which can bring to this world lasting peace for all nation, and happiness and…

    • 629 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “The Day the Bomb Went Off,” Knoll and Postol argue nuclear bombs are catastrophic. The event of a nuclear attack would send humans back to the stone age, and put a halt on any technological advances. Furthermore, the effects of radiation would harm the population within a broad radius of a nuclear explosion. Readers may wonder what America would do under nuclear attack, and draw the conclusion nuclear bombs would destroy everything our society has accomplished.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I clearly recognize that defensive systems have limitations and raise certain problems and ambiguities. If paired with offensive systems, they can be viewed as fostering an aggressive policy, and no one wants that. But with these considerations firmly in mind, I call upon the scientific community in our country, those who gave us nuclear weapons, to turn their great talents now to the cause of mankind and world peace, to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete.…

    • 5226 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it ended the war against Japan it sparked a new war with USSR. Which we now call the Cold War. Herken, the author of The WInning Weapon The Atomic Bomb In The Cold War 1945-1950, examines the United States on how they could have a nuclear war on their hands and what was done to avoid it. This title came from the early times after the war that the U.S has developed a winning weapon to give them the edge they needed.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cold War Dbq

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eisenhower’s next attempts to supress the American fears would be to boost the amount of nuclear power we as a nation maintained. In a message to Congress, Eisenhower attempted to boost the education of the American youth (Doc. G). Eisenhower, at that time, was like…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After World War II atomic research escalated into a frenzy. Many countries were trying to duplicate what America had done. The great arms race had begun. Although these countries knew the destructive power of the atom, they did not fully understand its more peace-full side, a side which helps us today with so much.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As World War II was coming to an end during 1945, the creation of one of the most destructive weapons known to humanity occurred within the United States. This weapon, known as “the atomic bomb,” was used on the two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in a death toll unprecedented by any military weapon used before and an immediate, unconditional surrender. Some historians believe President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union whereas others believe it was a strictly military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In the Report of a Scientific Panel of nuclear physicists, some scientific colleagues believed the atomic bomb was a “purely technical demonstration” to induce surrender. Other scientists believed that the use of the atomic bomb will improve international prospects in that they are more concerned with the prevention of war than with the elimination of this special weapon (Doc G). Thus, the United States dropped the atomic bomb to both force Japan’s unconditional surrender and to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Sanger, David E., Baker, Peter. “Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms”. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, April 5, 2010. Web. January 23, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pro nuclear war

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Everyone in the world is threatened by the existence of nuclear weapons. Has anyone the right to wield such destructive power?” (Morality of Nuclear Deterrent) Many people in the United States disagree on whether the United States should keep nuclear weapons. Mainly because of the moral factor. Yes, it is dangerous for countries to own such a powerful figure that threatens millions of people around the world, but the world is trapped by this idea of possible idea of nuclear war that just about every country has on these weapons of mass destruction and will continue to make more to show dominance over the other countries who don’t have as much. The moral factor that is sure to be constantly brought up by many people about keeping our nuclear weapons will always be discussed since the greater damage these weapons cause. For example, when the United Stated bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yes it was tactically right decision and prevented imperialism from expanding, and preventing the cause of japan gaining complete dominance over the world had to be overlooked when coming into the moral play off of the all the people who were affected by this disaster to their country. These cities where quite larger, but not to big so there…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the line, “The eyes of the world are upon you,” Eisenhower evokes a sense of purpose as the men are about to risk their lives for their home and country. These men are scared and the line gives the men the courage to stay strong. Additionally, it also hits home as it motivates the men by having them think about the future safety of their wives and children. Although the men fear losing their lives, it allows for the men to know that in the event that they die, they will not be forgotten and that they meaningfully contributed to advancing the…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atoms For Peace Speech

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear bombings in the Second World War, nuclear energy was linked to military purpose. The Atoms for Peace speech from Eisenhower in 1953 helped to change this point of view. In his speech he persuaded the world increase the researches within the nuclear power field with the focus on the energy possibilities, and start to decrease the potential destructive nuclear weapons. He shifted the focus from nuclear energy from war and fear to an open and peaceful way of generating energy (Atoms for Peace). The Dutch government already saw nuclear energy as a way to rebuild the Netherlands and to restore the international lead in physics, but the Eisenhower speech got the ball rolling and nuclear research centers were set up. Besides that an exhibition was held to show the Dutch people the civil applications of nuclear energy.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays