FAKULTY OF INFORMATICS
Effects of Different Project Management
Methods on Team Performance
Master’s Thesis
Bc. Tibor Szabó
Brno, 2012
Declaration
I declare that this Master’s thesis is my original work and that I have written it independently. All sources and literature that I have used during elaboration of the thesis are correctly cited with complete reference to the corresponding sources.
Tibor Szabó
Supervisor: doc. RNDr. Tomáš Pitner, Ph.D.
i
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank my supervisor doc. RNDR. Tomáš Pitner, Ph.D. for his valuable advice. I also want to thank my colleagues at InQool a.s. and partners at Kurzor s.r.o. and Celebrio software s.r.o. for their responsiveness and input.
ii
Abstract
Effiency of project management is a very actual topic among key executive managers in the information technology industry. Moreover investigating how different project management approaches influence the performance and motivation of employees is a subject of interest of many leaders and managers. Considering a team as a fundamental unit of a company brings new views and approches to standard managerial methods. In the first part of this thesis a continual description of key elements is included that affect the team, motivation and performance of companies. The final part of this thesis contains an in-depth analysis of various project management approches used in InQool a.s. company. Furthermore are included detailed results of a case study and research that was conducted among progressive technological companies located in Brno, Czech republic.
iii
Keywords
Project management, team, team management, performance, performance management, performance metrics, motivation, lean, agile
iv
Contents
1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2
2 The Team
Bibliography: Agilemanifesto.org/. [Online] 2001. [Cited: November 26, 2012.] http://agilemanifesto.org/. Belbin.com. [Online] BELBIN Associates, 2012. [Cited: November 13, 2012.] http://www.belbin.com/rte.asp?id=8. Learning. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences. 5:7, 2010. meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003, Vol. 88(4), pp. 741-749. Psychology . 1993, Vol. 120, 3. 16. Imai, Masaaki. Kaizen: The Key To Japan 's Competitive Success. s.l. : McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 1986 17. Jenkins, Jennifer M. Human Emotions: A Reader. s.l. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1998 20. Galinsky, Ellen and Bond, James T. The Business Work-Life Study, 1998: A Sourcebook [Online] Ziff Davis, Inc., February 19, 2008. [Cited: December 1, 2012.] http://www.hrworld.com/features/16-ways-measure-performance021908/. [Online] Change Factory Ltd., 2012. [Cited: December 1, 2012.] http://www.changefactory.com.au/articles/human-resourcemanagement/how-to-measure-people-s-performance/. November 13, 2012.] http://www.watsonwyatt.com/render.asp?catid=1&id=15414. Scottsdale : WorldatWork, 2000. 29. Wexley, K.N. Appraisal interview. Performance assessment. 1986, pp. 31. Spencer, L. and Spencer, S. Competence at work. New York, NY : John Wiley, 1994. [Cited: December 10, 2012.] http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/Management-tools-trends2011.aspx. s.l. : Addison-Wesley Professional, 2009. 978-0321658395. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2002. 978-1576752005.