Preview

Engineering The Better Baby Arthur Caplan Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
636 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Engineering The Better Baby Arthur Caplan Analysis
We all are scared of change and find the worst attributes of everything. So naturally we become scared of gene editing and the possible outcomes like safety issues, unfair accessibility, eugenics and many more. We focus on the bad instead of the good. We don’t stop to think of the good it can bring us. So in response Arthur Caplan in his article, “Engineering the Better Baby,” he talks about why the good outweighs the bad and how there are too many benefits to be worrying about possible dangers that can be fixed with safeguards. He tries to persuade the readers that genetic engineering and the progress to heal the sick should not be stopped because people are afraid.
In his article, “Engineering the Better Baby,” Arthur Caplan debuffs the main arguments against genetic modification of human embryos and explains why the benefits out weight the disadvantages. He believes that “It is far more
…show more content…
The way he does this is by appealing to the argument against gene-editing. He understands the fear of CRISPR and what could come of editing genes such as eugenics. So he addresses those fears and how they are incomparable to the benefits. He first points out the concerns of safety. He says that safety is an important element, but not a definitive one. The new gene-editing seem very accurate and have little risk. He brings up the example of animal tests and experiments on human embryos to prove this point. The purpose of this is to negate the fear of unsafe application
Second he mentions “the ethical concern of fairness” and how “the rich will have far better access to the technology than the poor.” He explains that the world is unfair and the rich aren’t going to wait for equal opportunity. Genetic engineering will follow the same dynamic. The reason he does this is to point out that nothing is fair and genetic engineering shouldn’t be inhibited because of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the excerpt “Ethics and the New Genetics” The Dalai Lama, also known as Tenzin Gyatso, presents to use the new arising discovery that scientists made in genetic technologies and how advanced they are becoming. He discusses how scientists are talking about being able to change the genetic make-up in produce to help those who cannot or have the advantage of having food. Another thing he brings up is how the scientists also discovered two different types of cloning. One type of cloning is therapeutic and the other is reproductive. In the Dalai Lama’s excerpt he stated that there is right time and place for when we should use these technological and genetic advances. But at the same time if we use these technological and genetic advances in the wrong way or at the wrong time it can end up being a long term consequence for our present and future society.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currently there are over 4000 single gene mutation diseases; “These ‘monogenic’ diseases include well-known conditions such as cystic fibrosis, sickle-cell anemia, and Tay-Sachs disease, as well as thousands of exceedingly rare illnesses that each afflict no more than a handful to a few hundred individuals in the world”. Producing designer babies could limit these diseases in infants and newborns, but it could also lead to a limit in genetic diversity and raises many other ethical dilemmas.…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Designer Babies Analysis

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When the topic of designer babies is presented, there is a multitude of ethical reasons that arise; one important concept is the questioning of how safe it is. The side effects of such a process are still unknown. Although the transfer of the DNA could be successful, there is a great possibility of a reshuffling of the entire genome. Assuming that the transfer and selectivity is completely safe, can it truly be considered…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genetic Engineering Debate: Are There Lines We Shouldn’t Cross? written by Jessica Erickson, shows that just because we can genetic engineer, doesn’t mean we should leave it unsupervised. Currently genetic engineering is available for plants, animals, and humans. Genetic engineering for plants and animals is quicker and less complex then doing it on humans. The next subject Erickson wrights about is the uses of genetic engineering. Erickson believes that genetic engineering could be good if it benefits diseases, prevent, and treatments, on the other hand Erickson believes genetic engineering could be bad if it is used for “designer babies”. Erickson believes that there should be a “Do not cross line”, which means that there should be government…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    . Sandel illustrates his unease with genetic enhancement by refuting arguments people have previously used to oppose genetic enhancement. All while telling us why such arguments were not successful, and redirecting our attention to the real dilemma. Sandel feels that the common arguments society makes against generic enhancement are not sufficient to portray the entire ethical problem and on top of that the arguments are flawed themselves. Arguments such as violation of autonomy, fairness, gap of economic classes, competition to perfection, and Nazi eugenics are not sufficient to express the moral unease that embodies the act of generic…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic modification is becoming closer and closer to an everyday possibility. With this possibility comes a whirlwind of possible effects, both positive and negative. There has been a history of opposition towards these technologies, oftentimes because of fear that the capabilities would be abused. However, the potential that newborns could be born free of hereditary diseases outweighs the fear of “designer babies”.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article, Designer Babies, is said to be written by the Future of Human Evolution Team so some, but not all collaborators include Bradley LaChance, the executive director of the Center for Evolutionary Technologies where he researches human advancement through technological advancements. Also, Norell Hadzimichalis, who has a PhD in molecular biology and has done postdoctoral research in neuroscience labs. Her experience and education is very helpful in writing this article. In the article, both sides of the argument are presented through problems and benefits with the technology and the role it has in society is explained. First of all, the problem of what to do with the failed embryos arises. Some people believe simply discarding them is an action too similar to abortion and therefore the process of genetically engineering embryos is not ethical, but a person’s opinion ultimately determines if they are pro-choice or pro-life.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    English 112 Essay

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dresser, Rebecca. "Genetic Modification of Preimplantation Embryos: Towards Adequate Human Research Policies." The Millbank Quarterly. Vol. 82, No.1. 195-214. 2004. Print.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modifying genes could be a way of preventing unwanted traits or enhance characteristics (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). Unfortunately, CRISPR is a first generation tool, so there is no possibility no damage will be done to the baby. As well as no security, the baby will not have any life-threatening defects, as it is known that “curing” one disease causes another. In fact, this will create a bad relationship between parents and children (The Ethnic of ‘Designer Babies’, Tia Ghose), since the children have no choice in being modified. Using babies to alter their characteristics is using them as science experiments since there are over one hundred genes that account for each trait and fifty genes account for three percent of one gene (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). With many parents willing to allow these experimentations to occur on their baby, it will come at a huge…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument between whether genetic engineering is wrong or right rages on every day, and will continue to be an issue until everybody can come to an agreement on what can and can’t be done. Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, writes about how she feels and questions the progression of modern science and how far we can go until it is just morally and ethically wrong. Through the mind of a young scientist, Mary pictures the possibility of what could happen if we venture too far into the unknown and how could it harm everyone. Knowing the line between continuing and finding things that can help society and knowing when to stop is essential to stop something from happening just like in the novel Frankenstein. Not only that, but many people argue over the fact that modifying the human body is wrong and go against the will of many different…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the year 1986 a health care policy was established. This policy is known as the “Health Care Engineering Policy Committee”. Carl Mitchem (1990) describes that this policy was made to safeguard humans from engineering experiments. He also states that a good decision making process should be endured before ultimately proceeding with these practices. (p. 229) Although this policy was made in order to keep people safe from engineering practices, we still face ethical dilemmas due to the engineering profession simply not following this policy. A very common controversial topic within the career of biomedical engineering is genetics. Within biomedical engineering comes what is known as “germline engineering”. In this branch engineers partake in cell and modifications. Dr. Philip Brey (2009) refers to this is as a “more controversial practice in which genes in eggs, sperm or…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel that genome editing takes away the mystery of life and how everyone is unique because of their genomes and how they were naturally born. Many people believe that disabilities hinder that person’s life and that they are never happy with their life as a result of their disability. However, “[o]ne study3 found that half of people with serious disabilities ranked their quality of life as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. ”(Hayden 4). This shows how they are happy with their lifestyles and that they wouldn’t want to change a single thing. Also, when mothers are pregnant, they are able to see if their child has a disability or any type of disease. However, some people decide not to know if their child has a disability or not because they don’t care about that and will love their child no matter what. For example, “Ethan Weiss doesn’t see a child with a disability. He sees his daughter making the most of her life, given all her strengths and challenges. And he knows that wouldn’t change a thing.” (Hayden 4). It shows how some people don’t care if anyone has disabilities and that everyone is special in their own way. Thus, from a social viewpoint, genome editing may not be the best option for the future generation, but it may help cure diseases that harm people’s…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays