Preview

Environment Versus Heredity, Optimist Versus Pessimistic, Reactive vs Proactive

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1417 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Environment Versus Heredity, Optimist Versus Pessimistic, Reactive vs Proactive
Short Notes on Environment versus Heredity, Optimist versus Pessimistic, Reactive vs Proactive

Environment versus Heredity this refers to the same as nature versus nurture. Nature refers to heredity: the genetic makeup or "genotypes" referring to information that is encoded and imprinted in a person’s Deoxyribonucleic acid otherwise called DNA. The notion of nature, therefore, refers to the biologically prescribed tendencies and capabilities individuals possess, which may unfold themselves throughout the course of life. Heredity may range from this is a specific genetic predispositions that are specific to each individual and that therefore potentially explain differences in individual characteristics example temperament, to those supposedly specific to certain groups and that therefore account for group differences in related characteristics example gender and height, and to those that are theorized to be shared by all humans and are generally thought to set humans apart from other species example the language acquisition device in humans (J. Rank,2013).
Nurture, by contrast, refers to various external or environmental factors to which an individual is exposed from conception to death. These environmental factors involve several dimensions. For example, they include both physical environments and the atmosphere one example of this is secondhand smoking and prenatal nutrition. Another environmental factor is the social environments; example of this is the media and peer pressure. Also, environmental factors vary in their immediacy to the individual; they involve multiple layers of forces, ranging from most immediate, which include families, friends, and neighborhoods to a larger contexts of school systems and local governments and goes up to macro factors such as international politics and global warming. To complicate matters even further, the factors in each of these layers influence and are influenced by elements within and outside of these layers. For

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nature vs. nurture develops a strong debate in psychology. It is made up of two independent dynamics with different approaches in behavioural changes. The two dynamics is made up of nature and nurture. There are no contentions that McLeod's tries to unravel technical differences between the two dynamics. In the novel frankenstein Nature expresses the external characteristics of human beings that are projected by genetic inheritance. It is difficult to alter changes in some external, internal characteristics that are developed by inheritance of particular genes. Nurture refers to external expressions developed by interaction of different environments and people. It is evident that nurture characteristic can be altered by the people. This is…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetics or genes are solely responsible for transferring human characteristics to offspring from the parents. The nature versus nurture theory is one of the major controversies associated with genetics as it applies to heredity.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nature refers to an individual's innate qualities (nativism). Nature is your genes. The physical and personality traits determined by your genes stay the same irrespective of where you were born and raised. Nature factors that trigger an individual to commit crime are influences by biological and family factors. The nature method suggests that individuals are born with qualities, abilities and characteristics that determine the kind of person that individual will become.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Disaster in Franklin Co.

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nature vs Nurture are studies that have been going on for years within the scientific community to explain multiple issues. Some studies will suggest that nature makes us who who are, meaning genetic factors are the major contributor of being who we are. These include what personality traits, intelligence, and emotional characteristics we will inherit from our parents. Thus, these studies ultimately state we are genetically predisposed in deciding who we become. On the other side of the debate is the nurture studies, meaning environmental factors are the major contributors to shaping us into who we are or become. This include your upbringing, your lifestyle, home environment and the way someone was interacted with, taught or treated as a young child.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Genes and the environment affect every characteristic (Beal, 2010). Nature always affects nurture, and nurture always affects nature. In development, nature refers to the traits, capacities, and limitations that each individual inherits genetically from his or her parents at the moment of conception (Beal, 2010). Nature includes serotonin in the brain and physiological maturation that can affect development. Biological and environmental issues can affect critical and sensitive periods of development. Poor maternal nutrition can permit normal infant development, delaying or damaging motor skills (Beal,…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nature is what we are born with. What we inherit from our parents, for example - Hair colour, eye colour, some illnesses. (Although you can inherit illnesses you will not definitely become ill, you are just have a higher risk of becoming ill) Nature is also known as Genotype.…

    • 3602 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The major debate concerning nature and nurture has been going on for decades and is still unresolved. Many people like to believe what we have inherited and our genes are what make us unique (the way we are and how we develop). Other people believe that the way we are raised and our experiences, that make us the way we are and how we grow. Physically the way we are built and look can be mainly due to nature. The genes that we inherit from our parents make the way of we look. For example, people say ‘Don’t you look like your mother?’ Genetic inheritance can define our eye colour (blue or hazel), whether we have straight or curly hair or how small we might…

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nature versus nurture is one of the oldest debates in the world of psychology. It centers on the contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to the development of human beings.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nature is defined as “the inborn, innate character of an organism” (PSYCH 56). This concept is also described using the term, genotype, which describes a person’s genetic structure. Nature is used to express why people who are closely related have similar IQ scores, and why nativist theorists believe that children…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nature refers to all the genes and hereditary factors that influences who we are from our personality characteristics to physical appearance. The coding of genes in each cell determines the different traits we have like: eye color, hair color, ear size, height, and other traits. However, it is still unknown whether…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nature Vs Nurture Theory

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Physical features, although unique in some measure, are proven to be acquired from the biological parents of any organism. The Nature v. Nurture debate relates to humans and how they develop their unique behavioral habits. Many who support the Nature Theory endorse essentially that a person’s intelligence, personality, aggression, and sexual orientation pertain primarily to their DNA stemmed from their biological parents (Powell). For example, if someone’s parents are depressed or violent, the Nature Theory supporters conclude that their offspring will also bear these negative these traits. However, the Nurture Theory presents that these behavioral aspects are originated predominantly from the environmental factors of our upbringing, which…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nurture debate cites environmental and social causes of our behaviours. "Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture" . It also includes where we are raised, who we are raised by and who we are raised with, all of which are thought to have an impact on our development. If the conditions mentioned above happen to all be very negative (such as being raised by a drug addict in a slum neighbourhood) then a child can suffer severe issues with their social skills and their moral groundings. Trauma in early life such as watching a loved one suffer or being gravely mistreated…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Nature Or Nurture?

    • 2393 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Nurture can be good or it can be bad. Nurture is defined as the environmental factors that influence an organism’s…

    • 2393 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nature Vs Nurture Debate

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Over recent years the nature vs. nurture debate has been extensively discussed and researched. Should human characteristics such as intelligence, personality, behavior and ability be attributed to our genetics or our environment? One problem with this is how to pin a trait down to either an inherited or learned characteristic, or perhaps it’s both.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    nurture argument, also sometimes referred to as the nativist–empiricist debate (Spencer et. al., 2009), hinges on the belief that the two concepts are distinct from one another. In theory, a person’s nature is determined by a very rigid and unchanging genetic code. Additionally, the “nurture” perspective holds that person’s environment is ever-shifting and can alter a person’s belief system, morals, and values. This theory, however, is flawed based on new research which lends credibility to an evolving concept which is the epigenome. (Watters, 2006). Resting between the static set of genes that a person is born with and the dynamic environment in which a person interacts, is the epigenome. It is a highly intricate and interactive component which blurs the line between “nature” and “nurture” arguments. Discussing the human condition cannot be reduced to a position of nature or nurture. Human growth and development is largely reliant on both and the discovery and study of the epigenome supports…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays