1. Performance evaluations- The employee evaluations are not a complete review of the employee and they are not very honest. The evaluation forms lack detail and information; they are vague.…
A manager rating an employee more severely than their work performance merits will create a frustrated and disgruntled employee. Workers will resent the unfair assessment of their performance. The opposite is also true, if a manager rates an employee more favourably than their performance merits “cheats them and the department of the benefits of exploring areas for improvement and the opportunities for developing and coaching” (MacKenzie, 2013)…
Performance reviews play an important role in the overall objective of performance management. Performance reviews serve as a tool to help employees improve their overall standards by helping them realize their full potential, and also provides information to employees and managers for decision-making. Reviews provide reasons employees changed positions whether they needed more training or promotion, or needed to be let go. They provide feedback to employees, provide developmental needs, and help spot organizational problems. Using the management by objective (MBO) process establishes objectives that employees need to accomplish and sets agreeable standards by both employee and management. I suggest having immediate supervisors, self-appraisals, and customer feedback to evaluate performance. The supervisors or direct managers are most familiar with the individual’s performance. “Self-appraisals give the employee the opportunity to rate themselves in regards to their job performance.” (Cascio, 2013) It provides the opportunity to be involved in the performance appraisal process. Customer feedback is also very useful input for employment decisions, such as promotion, transfer and training…
Even though performance appraisals can be good for the organization, it can also be a controversial management tool. Critics of performance appraisals have many compelling arguments against its use. They can have a false degree of accuracy, engenders dysfunctional employee conflict and competition, assigns an inordinate amount of responsibility to individual with poor work performance. Many will argue that these negative effects of appraisal can be fixed through genuine employee participation.…
Although I have never actually given a performance evaluation personally, I know that as a manager he or she must go into it leaving all personal feelings aside. For instance, if a manager is faced with giving an evaluation of an employee he or she is has a relationship with outside of the workplace; they must base the evaluation solely on the employees work performance and not base any of their decisions on the personal relationship he or she may have with this employee. Just as the manager cannot base the evaluation on friendship, they also must put any personal feelings of dislike they may have for an employee aside as well. A manager must go into the evaluation with neutral feelings for all of his or her employees and should not base a performance rating on their personal feelings. This can be a challenge because as human beings we base most of our decisions of others on emotions and how we feel about them personally and as a manager you cannot do this or the company could face lawsuits down the road for discrimination.…
Ralphs Grocery Company runs about 260 Ralphs supermarkets in Southern California and also some 115 warehouse-style stores.…
Most large organizations have implemented policies that dictate how they will conduct employee relations. One area of employee relations is the giving performance evaluations. In this paper, the moral and ethical issues faced by managers giving performance evaluations will be addressed. The relationship between social issues and ethically responsible management practices in the giving of performance evaluations will be discussed. A workplace example of an ethical issue involving a performance evaluation will be provided. The legal aspects that governed the ethical issue will be identified and examined.…
Many organizations use a combination of evaluations; depending on the size of the organization, as tools to identify needs within the company to show weaknesses or strengths of an employee, or of the organization, that is being evaluated. The correct evaluation used and the correct rating scale depend on the number of employees doing the same job, size of the organization, and ultimately the amount of money, time, and resources that an organization wants to spend on the evaluations (“Employee Performance Evaluations,” n.d.).…
They help supervisors evaluate and measure employee performance, provide continual feedback, and recognize and reinforce positive performance. Management should performe annual performance of evaluations to their employees. It should be an on going process. In order for any performance of evaluation system to work, supervisors must regularly evaluate employee performance and not put off reviewing employees until their review dates. They must also engage in ongoing communication with their subordinates regarding performance issues. Properly utilizing performance of evaluations measure employee and supervisor performance. Many managers view performance of evaluations as a record of employee performance only. However, performance of evaluations also reflect how well supervisors communicate and otherwise relate to their…
A concern is what appears to be inadequate training on the part of the employee and potentially personal bias, where Kondrasuk (2011) highlights how favoritism or severity can skew the rating leading to unsatisfactory evaluations. In addition, when a supervisor or rater lacks commitment, or uses the appraisal form as (Roberts, 1998;…
There are a number of models of ethical decision making and action. For example, business ethics educators Charles Powers and David Vogel identify six factors or elements that underlie moral reasoning and behavior and that are particularly relevant in organizational settings.1 The first is moral imagination, the recognition that even routine choices and relationships have an ethical dimension. The second is moral identification and ordering, which, as the name suggests, refers to the ability to identify important issues, determine priorities, and sort out competing values. The third factor is moral evaluation, or using analytical skills to evaluate options. The fourth element is tolerating moral disagreement and ambiguity, which arises when managers disagree about values and courses of action. The fifth is the ability to integrate managerial competence with moral competence. This integration involves…
The topic I choose for my paper was hiring, many managers are faced a million decision when deciding who they will hiring to work for their company. There are moral issues and various ethical decisions that they have to evaluate before actually telling a person they are fit for a position. I know for myself as being a Human Resource manager for many years it is not a quick decision but one that you will hope will be a good fit for everyone that is involved in the company.…
Assuming as a manager of a large Australian clothing retailer with a manufacture mainly based in Bangladesh, the manager would have to be involved in various types of decision making processes for the well-being of its organization. For instance due to the Rana-Plaza incident, a safety accord has been generated which is an understanding of an organization towards its employees to upgrade factories conditions with basic standards such as fire escapes and many more √ ("Kmart, Target Sign Up to Safety Accord for Bangladesh Garment Workers." 2013). Over the years, manufacturers working with popular clothing companies have faced disastrous issues such as building collapses or fires, threatening the safety of all its workers ("Retailers Sign Bangladesh…
Ethical problems are also pervasive because managers make decisions and take actions that affect other people. Managerial decisions and actions need to be addressed and require some degree of moral analysis when:…
In this article review I intend to summarize and evaluate the adaption of James Weber’s article “Adapting Kohlberg to Enhance the Assessment of Managers”. Weber’s article discusses six stages and four adaptations of Lawrence Kohlberg’s Moral Judgment Interview and Standard Issue Scoring method. An empirical investigation tested the modifications to see if they helped enhance the evaluation of a manager’s moral reasoning. If these four adaptions can enhance the evaluation of a manager’s moral reasoning, then I consider that it would greatly help a company understand its manager’s decisions when facing ethical and/or moral dilemmas.…