Europe and China compare and contrast essay
The Political Organization in Europe and China and Europe and India
The political organization of Europe and China and of Europe and India had some similar and different aspects to their way of ruling and running their societies. They all underwent construction of states which led to expansion of their societies and later caused conflict. The effort at political organization in Europe and China and Europe and India was that they tried to become more ordered. In Europe they have a decentralized government and in China they have centralized government. In the late sixth century the ruler, Yang Jian, of northern China launched military campaigns which brought all of China under “centralized imperial rule” according to Traditions & Encounters a global perspective on the past by Jerry Bentley. After the Carolingian empire in Europe divided, European nobles according to Traditions & Encounters a global perspective on the past by Jerry Bentley “built a decentralized society” because they pursued to protect their land and maintain public order. Europe also encountered economic growth and social occurrence. In China they had dynasties and in Europe they did not. China had the Sui dynasty, the Tang dynasty, and the Song dynasty as for in Europe they had a government society. China had a certain ruler that was hereditary and they got passed down to their blood line. In Europe they had empires groups of regional states and countries. In Europe they formed regional states as it says from Traditions & Encounters a global perspective on the past by Jerry Bentley, “Yet they also organized their own territories efficiently, and they laid the political foundations for the emergence of powerful national states in a later era” Europe and India have some similarities such as they both have centralized “imperial rules”. In India after the Gupta dynasty fell, they still had a centralized government as Traditions & Encounters a global perspective on the past by Jerry Bentley says
The political organization of Europe and China and of Europe and India had some similar and different aspects to their way of ruling and running their societies. They all underwent construction of states which led to expansion of their societies and later caused conflict. The effort at political organization in Europe and China and Europe and India was that they tried to become more ordered. In Europe they have a decentralized government and in China they have centralized government. In the late sixth century the ruler, Yang Jian, of northern China launched military campaigns which brought all of China under “centralized imperial rule” according to Traditions & Encounters a global perspective on the past by Jerry Bentley. After the Carolingian empire in Europe divided, European nobles according to Traditions & Encounters a global perspective on the past by Jerry Bentley “built a decentralized society” because they pursued to protect their land and maintain public order. Europe also encountered economic growth and social occurrence. In China they had dynasties and in Europe they did not. China had the Sui dynasty, the Tang dynasty, and the Song dynasty as for in Europe they had a government society. China had a certain ruler that was hereditary and they got passed down to their blood line. In Europe they had empires groups of regional states and countries. In Europe they formed regional states as it says from Traditions & Encounters a global perspective on the past by Jerry Bentley, “Yet they also organized their own territories efficiently, and they laid the political foundations for the emergence of powerful national states in a later era” Europe and India have some similarities such as they both have centralized “imperial rules”. In India after the Gupta dynasty fell, they still had a centralized government as Traditions & Encounters a global perspective on the past by Jerry Bentley says