Preview

Evolution In Public Schools

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
639 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evolution In Public Schools
Individuals’ opinions towards the theory of evolution can be viewed as a social construct through social institutions such as their education and church. A student with certain discourse throughout their teachings may hinder their incoming knowledge towards evolution by subjective previous knowledge. Through this activity, the students were able to reconstruct their notions of evolution by questioning previous knowledge with knowledge that has been acquired. Through the interaction of group members, it was objectively discussed about each individual’s view on evolution - what their prior knowledge was and their current understanding is. During the discussion, the attention was focused on why or why not the schools should be allowed to teach …show more content…
For this reason, it was discussed that schools should not be able to prohibit the teaching of evolution studies in public schools. Two arguments were formed; the first being that it could be considered unfair to students who do not believe in evolution due to their religion, and the second argument believed that if evolution is not being taught in schools, it would restrict the future scientists from understanding concepts to obtain new discoveries and …show more content…
The point came up that if evolution was taught as a science based on facts and not a moral based on opinion, it would be more acceptable to teach in public schools. Many individuals that do not accept evolution can be considered close minded, therefore, they do not accept ideas other than what they had been previously taught and lack the education that surrounds evolution. What can be understood about education has been to educate students about the world that surrounds them. Being presented with evolution and all that it has encompassed, has exposed students with different ways of thinking opening them up to different parts of science that is otherwise left unexposed.
The final message was, the entire group agreed upon evolution; however both sides of the arguments were discussed to try to understand the different viewpoints that individuals may have and the reasons that they have them. Collectively we agreed that negative notions of evolution have been internalized by the discourse that many students are subjected to through social institutions. Due to the lack of education on evolution, many do not understand the concepts which has led to misinterpretations about

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the 1920’s the very idea of evolution was heavily criticized due to a majority of the american population believing in creationism. It had become a tradition for parents to teach their kids about how people came from Adam and Eve. This tradition became under scrutiny when the theory of evolution was proposed by Charles Darwin. It was in direct contrast with creationism and was based in science. A debate started in the 1920s about which one was was true, and then an even bigger debate occurred when the question whether or not the theory of evolution should be taught in school, was raised. Even though in the 1920s, creationism was prevalently believed around the nation there were people that opposed this belief. These people were referred to as modernists because they would rather believe in science than traditional beliefs.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This sparked a mass of controversy. The proposal from Buckingham raised an eyebrow to whether intelligent design should be taught in science classrooms as an alternative to evolution. Personally, I believe intelligent design can be mentioned in the classroom in a comparative sense, but the approach and delivery is what is significant. In the science classroom, it is important for students to learn about Darwin and the theory of evolution, but nothing should be introduced in a persuasive or derogatory manner because the school is meant to educate and not…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) This theory of evolution, though often presented as an established fact, is up to the present time only an unverified hypothesis. (2) Science has utterly failed to discover any missing links between man and the supposed animals from which he originated. (3) Furthermore, evolutionists argue that evolutionary trends occur through the processes of mutation. But this view fails to account for the increased complexity of man. (4) Scientists have utterly failed to demonstrate or identify the origin of life (organic) from inorganic substances.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “One Side Can Be Wrong,” Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne argue that teaching creationism along side evolution does not make sense, and that creationism has no business being in the science classes. Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne are evolutionary biologists at Oxford University and the University of Chicago. They published this essay in the Guardian in September 2005, seeking to appeal to middle-aged parents. They argue that creationism cannot provide any positive evidence to create a controversy and therefore should not be taught in schools to children and teenagers. On the other hand, there is a substantial amount of evidence for evolution where debate and conversation can arise.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clarence Darrow

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the early 1920’s Traditionalists, the older Victorians worried that everything valuable was ending. Modernists no longer asked about the society and their behavior which bothered a lot of people. Only weather their behavior met the approval of their intellect. Americans danced to the sound of Jazz Age, showed their contempt for alcoholic prohibition. In a response to the new social patterns in motion by modernism, a wave of revivalism developed, becoming especially strong in the American South. The “Scopes Trial” was held in Dayton, Tennessee courtroom in the summer of 1925. In there was a big jury to decide the fate of John Scopes who was 24. John Scopes was a high school biology teacher and part time football coach who was charged with illegally teaching the theory of evolution. The guilt or innocence of John Scopes, and the constitutionality of Tennessee anti evolution statute, mattered a little. The whole point of this trial is emerged through its interpretation as a conflict of social and intellectual values.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Bryan’s campaign against evolution in schools, he had three main ideas. His first idea was that Darwinism was the…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scopes Trial Analysis

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even though Scopes had taught the theory of evolution, his defense lawyers in the case pleaded “...an act of this sort is clearly unconstitutional in that it is a restriction upon the liberties of the individual…”(Jeffrey P. Moran, Pg.82). On the other hand the prosecutors stated that teachers “...cannot teach any religion in the schools, therefore you cannot teach any evolution, or any doctrine that conflicts with the Bible.”(Jeffrey P. Moran, Pg.82). With the defense supporting science and the prosecution supporting the traditional Bible, this case has made it clear that in Dayton, Tennessee 1925 the teachings of science and religion can not simply coexist in a classroom. With teaching both religion and science in a classroom, it is inevitable that a student learning the story of the Bible and then learning the theory of science, would start to question which one holds the truth. In a letter written by Mrs. Jesse Sparks about the Butler act says, “...I could not see why the mothers in greater number were not conveying their appreciation to the members for this act of safeguarding their children from one of the destructive forces…”(Moran, Pg.204), which shows the concern from the religious point of view that the teaching of evolution might destruct the religious beliefs parents had taught their children. The reason why this topic had become so controversial was that the teaching of science conflicted with the views of the religious orthodox south which had been very dominant in 1925. This being said, science and religion in a classroom could not coexist in that day and…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scopes Code

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1925 John Scopes challenged the Tennessee school system and the law when he decided to continue to teach Darwin’s theory of evolution although it had been banned to teach since it had went against thing written in the bible. This drew the attention of two men Clarence Darrow and William Jennings. Jennings stated that the theory of evolution isn’t fact and made students doubt their Christian faith while Darrow argued that the children should have intellectual and religious freedom. In this paper I will be arguing against Mr. Jennings because it is true that the children should have the right to learn about evolution or practise their religion as they wish.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scopes Trial

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first reason it was more complicated was that because someone finally got caught and this brought up the discussion of the newly passed law of being prohibited from teaching about evolution. From a website I found online, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/08/2/l_082_01.html, I found out that evolutionists brought up the new law. “Narrowly, the trial was about challenging a newly passed Tennessee state law against teaching evolution or any other theory denying the biblical account of the creation of man”; this was the law that was passed in Tennessee which created a more big controversy than the actual act John Scopes himself. But, this was a perfect opportunity for evolutionists to make a stand and to create a more modern way of thinking.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These characteristics ascertain the laws, boundaries, and guidelines that science follows. In a science course, all abilities conveyed are shown, or has been above board in the past, to anatomy an abstinent adherence to these qualities. Creationism does not anatomy any adherence whatsoever to these rules and guidelines of science. Therefore, it should not be included in the science apish in accessible schools, even as an accretion to evolution.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, religion and science have been in constant clashes, and one of the most recent clashes is whether if creationism and/or intelligent design should be taught in public schools.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notes

    • 2090 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Learning Objectives: Students should be able to ... • Define evolution, fitness, and adaptation using the biological definitions. • Describe the nature of the evidence regarding (1) whether species change through time and (2) whether they are related by common ancestry. • Assess whether Darwin's four postulates are true in any given example, explain to a friend why evolution must occur if all four are true, and explain whether evolution will occur if any of the four are not true. • Identify common misconceptions about evolution, and give examples to illustrate why they are not true. (For example: Is evolution progressive? Do animals do things "for the good of the species"? Does evolution result in perfection?) Lecture Outline • Evolution is one of the best-supported and most important theories in the history of science. • Evolution is one of the five attributes of life. • Evolution has both a pattern and a process. I. The Evolution of Evolutionary Thought A. Plato and typological thinking 1. Plato saw species as unchanging, perfect "types" created by God. 2. Plato thought individual variation was an unimportant deviation from the true "type." B. Aristotle and the great chain of being (scale of nature) 1. Aristotle, like Plato, thought species were unchanging types. 2. Aristotle thought species could be organized into a sequence or ladder of increasing complexity, with humans at the top. (Fig. 24.1) C. Lamarck and the idea of evolution as change through time 1. Lamarck noticed that organisms changed over time. 2. Lamarck thought animals progressed over time from "lower" to "higher" forms (like Aristotle's ladder) via inheritance of acquired characteristics. D. Darwin and Wallace and evolution by natural selection 1. Species change over time, but they do not "progress." 2. A species does not have a single true "type." 3. Individual variation is important; variation is what drives…

    • 2090 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weston Meehan

    • 3393 Words
    • 14 Pages

    In today’s society there is a war going on, a battle to control our minds, hearts, and souls with a simple idea. An idea so dangerous that it not only has it indoctrinated us as a generation, but indoctrinating future generations without so much has a scrap of scientific evidence. An idea that questions our livelihood, why we are here, why we do what we do, and where do we go when it is all said and done. This idea is known as the Evolutionary theory and its concepts derived nearly 200 years ago by Charles Darwin in his book the Origin of Species. Darwin states” I see no good reasons why the views given in this volume should shock the religious views of anyone.” (1859, pp. 520)…

    • 3393 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although On the Origin of Species sparked many wondrous and compelling new thinking in science, it also caused unintentional ideas and debates. Some of these ideas were social and some were religious. Although Darwin knew his findings would cause some disruption and new ideas, he never planned for his findings to reignite one of the most world-renowned debates: the debate between religion and science. Darwin pronounced, "I see no good reason why the views given in this volume should shock the religious feelings of anyone" (Darwin.748). Charles Darwin was indicating that his novel is not meant to change religious ways and ideas. The book was to show what he found during his travels and the evidence to prove his idea of natural selection.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought about the things we teach at our public schools? How everything that is said to a student has an effect on the way they think or understand things. How are we sure that we teach them everything they need to know? And who decides the purpose or requirement of each class given? Education is to enlighten the young and naive to better their purpose in our society; and by teaching them both Evolution and Intelligent Design it give them more knowledge and a different way to look and examine things.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays