Preview

Examples Of Oppression Is Not Freedom Of Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1113 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Oppression Is Not Freedom Of Speech
Oppression is Not Freedom of Speech Atheists promote Satan. Only Muslims commit violent acts of terrorism. Homosexual people ruin the sanctity of marriage. Homeless people choose homelessness. Not only do each of these statements oppress a group of people, but each of them is poorly stated. In a government that allows it, the idea of freedom of speech is a given right; however, certain things, such as discriminating stereotypes of minority groups, are oppressive. In Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, free speech is defined as “[s]peech that is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.” On the contrary, that same dictionary defines oppression as “[u]njust or cruel exercise of authority or power.” Free speech is a right protected by the constitution; however, oppression uses that right to discriminate. …show more content…
The right to freedom of speech protects the opinions and freely shared thoughts of people. However, slurs against certain races and religions, misogynistic terms, and ableism are all oppressive. Freedom of speech allows people to have their opinions, as well as share them with others; it does not, however, allow them to use hateful language and dehumanize others with their words. Using slurs and ableist language to identify a person or a group of people is oppressive. A person who is racist may not refer to people of color with demeaning terms without facing the consequences. One may claim it his or her constitutional right to use dehumanizing and ableist slurs to refer to certain people, but she or he is oppressing those people and may no longer use freedom of speech as an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The politically correctness of language is infringing on our First Amendment rights, but is it right to protect our freedom of speech when it causes verbal harassment to others? There is no way to limit what can be said, no way to restrict language used by others. Yes, we can state that it is politically incorrect, but that will not stop people from using words to hurt others. It is a vicious cycle that has no…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freedom of speech is the right to express your ideas and opinions when you’re speaking. Equality 7-2521 was a very intelligent man. He was the smartest in his class, also known as Home of Students. Home of Students is a boarding school where he lives. He was full of ideas which he wasn’t allowed to express. Everybody had to be the same; nobody…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    GOVERNEMNT

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion, The freedom of speech is protected by the first amendment. I agree with the prosecutioner in the case of Texas v. Johnson by stating that Johnson’s right to freedom of speech in the first amendment was violated. Even though the state law was violated, the law was unconstitutional by violating the first amendment.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the general public is asked to refrain from the use of a few words that may be offensive to others, the right to freedom of speech is not infringed upon. In most cases a group of concerned citizens vocalize the need to discontinue the use of a particular word that evokes discomfort in other citizens. For example, there is a campaign against the use of the word “retarded,” and it is called “Spread the Word to End the Word (Downes).” It is not required by law for every citizen of the United States to abstain from using the word “retarded,” so the right to freedom of speech has not been…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As American Citizens our freedom of speech is protected by the Constitution’s first Amendment which “guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition…” (Cornell Law 2017), but that doesn’t or shouldn’t give anyone the right to cause harm or violence against another person or group of people if we do not agree or share the same beliefs. The laws were created to protect us, but many people interpret the laws differently and therefore, feel entitled to speak freely even if it causes…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limitations on freedoms of society are crucial, especially in America. As Roger Rosenblatt noted in his essay, “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead,” many people express their freedom of speech in very offensive and controversial ways. Often their expressions violate other amendments and freedoms as well.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People are entitled to one of the rights listed in the first amendment, the freedom of speech. It’s true that some people are hateful but even if we don’t like, agree, or even joke about it we don’t have the right to control them. People are unable to express their thoughts and feelings because they do not want to offend others.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ellen Goodman Hate Speech

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is a fine line in what is considered freedom of speech and what impedes on another person’s freedom. In fact John Stuart Mill states in his book On Liberty, “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (1978, 9). The use of hate speech has a strong impact, especially in minority groups where the support system is not very strong. One example hate speech being persecuted is in an article from the website Grapevine titled Ten Charged with Hate Speech Towards LGBT Community. While some individuals may argue that the freedom of speech is the right of all Americans, there are definitely limits when it comes to the hatred and harassment of a particular group. The law enacted which included sexual orientation in the group where hate speech is not allowed stemmed from the fact that the suicide rate for LGBT teens is much higher than it is for other teens. The Trevor project found LGBT teens are 4 times more likely to attempt…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks, threatens, or insults a person or group on the basis of national origin, ethnicity, color, religion, gender, secual oorientation, or disability. Unless hate speech crosses the line into…

    • 1247 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allowing people to speak freely is easy when what they say is not offensive. Being free to say things that offend or insult other groups of people may be necessary to challenge those in power or to identify problems within society. I am sure some would argue that hate speech serves no purpose but to offend and divide. To that argument, I would quickly point out that we should not be afraid of what people say, write, or think. You don't fight ideas by attempting to silence them. You fight them with better ideas. Also, who decides what is offensive? For example, if someone said, “I'm sick of Black people killing each other in Chicago”, some would find that offensive, but is that hate speech? We can easily say no, but it would not be our decision. Once a law is in place, those in charge decide how it is implemented. This is the other problem with limiting free speech, those in power would set and interpret the law. History is littered with examples of people gaining power then using that power to silence their…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people take advantage of the freedom of speech.According to the observer it states that “these same people would claim that the right of freedom of speech has a limit that ends once a speaker’s words turn offensive or derogatory”.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racist speech

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lawrence begins his article with a focus on the unmistakable message that racial speech “sends a destructive message to minorities that they are inferior and are in turn second class citizens.” (Lawrence). He further feels that the problem of racist speech “has been framed as one in which the liberty of free speech is in conflict with the elimination of racism.” He continues: “I believe this has placed the bigot on the moral high ground and fanned the rising flames of racism. Above all, I am troubled that we have not listened to the real victims, that we have shown so little understanding of their injury, and that we have abandoned those whose race, gender, or sexual preference continues to make them second-class citizens.” (Lawrence).…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since 1791, the freedom of speech has been a civil liberty to all Americans. Our founding fathers wrote the Bill of Rights to protect citizens from the government, and restricting what we can or can’t say is unconstitutional. Freedom of speech has greatly impacted America and putting restraints on our freedoms may cause many issues within society that can result in a lot more damage than words. Individually we have the right to say whatever we want and it’s more up to the other individual on how they interpret it and how it affects them personally. Despite hate speech being hateful and demeaning to targets, there should be no limits to our freedom of speech.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Issue

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Being able to express one’s self is one of the most important rights of the people to maintain a connected society right to speech should be accepted to do so. The first amendment is one of the most fundamental rights that individuals have. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. This amendment describes the principal rights of the citizens of the United States. If the citizens were unable to criticize the government, it would be impossible to regulate order. By looking at freedom of speech there is also freedom of assembly and freedom of press that are crucial for the United States democracy. According to the “Derechos, Human Rights”, freedom of speech is one of the most dangerous rights, because it means the freedom to express one's discontent with the status quo and the desire to change it. These types of rights are protected by the first amendment. There are groups for example like ACLU and other type of organization. ACLU is “America’s nation's guardian of liberty”, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights that the Constitution protects. We should be allowed to try our first amendment right specifically dealing with freedom of speech.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hate Groups

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As stated in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, free speech is where, “Congress shall make no law …abridging the freedom of speech …or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Legal Information Institute [LIT], n.d.-f). Despite the brevity, the one sentence that is the First Amendment has proven to be a vague clause that has arbitrarily seen the freedom of hate speech and the persecution of free speech. As pointed out by Tsesis (2016), the First Amendment merely acknowledges the importance of the freedom of speech and of its existence in the United States, but does not define what free speech actually is (p. 1021). The importance of specifying that only “Congress shall make no law” implies that it is the duty of the Supreme Court to determine what is allowed under free speech, as the Constitution was meant to be a be a “living document” to be added on to as the United States changed over time (United States Courts [USC], n.d.-a). However, this poses a problem, as since there have been two and a half centuries of cases decided by the Supreme Court, many people outside of the criminal justice system are dangerously unaware of what exactly their freedom of speech entitles them to. This applies even more so to hate groups, whose…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays